A comparison of single words and conversational speech in phonological evaluation

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 229-241

  Masterson, Julie J ^a   Bernhardt, Barbara H ^b   Hofheinz, Monica K ^c  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c National Health Care   (United States)

Author keywords

Conversational speech; Phonological sampling; Single words

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744500939     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2005/023)     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andrews, N., & Fey, M. E. (1986). Analysis of the speech of phonologically impaired children in two sampling conditions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 17, 187-198.
2. Bernhardt, B. H., & Holdgrafer, G. (2001a). Beyond the basics I: The need for strategic sampling for in-depth phonological analysis. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 18-27.
3. Bernhardt, B. H., & Holdgrafer, G. (2001b). Beyond the basics II: Supplemental sampling for in-depth phonological analysis. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 28-37.
4. Bernhardt, B., & Stemberger, J. (2000). Workbook in nonlinear phonology for clinical application. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
5. Bernthal, J. E., Grossman, F. M., & Aerts-Goll, A. E. (1989). Phonologically delayed children's responses to three types of pictured stimuli. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 12, 137-143.
6. Bleile, K. (2002). Evaluating articulation and phonological disorders when the clock is running. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 243-249.
7. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1995). Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In F. Bell-Berti & L. J. Raphael (Eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues. For Katherine Safford Harris (pp. 19-34). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
8. Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language - Third Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
9. DuBois, E., & Bernthal, J. E. (1978). A comparison of three methods for obtaining articulatory responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 295-305.
10. Dyson, A. T., & Robinson, T. W. (1987). The effect of phonological analysis procedures on the selection of potential remediation targets. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 17, 187-198.
11. Faircloth, M. A., & Faircloth, S. R. (1970). An analysis of the articulator behavior of a speech-defective child in connected speech and in isolated-word responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 35, 51-61.
12. Fey, M. E. (1992). Articulation and phonology: Inextricable constructs in speech pathology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 225-232.
13. Gallagher, R., & Shriner, T. (1975). Contextual variables related to inconsistent /s/ and /z/ production in the spontaneous speech of children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 623-633.
14. Gierut, J. (1998). Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14, 85-101.
15. Healy, T. J., & Madison, C. L. (1987). Articulation error migration: A comparison of single word and connected speech samples. Journal of Communication Disorders, 20, 129-136.
16. Hodson, B., & Paden, E. (1983). Targeting intelligible speech. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
17. Hodson, B. W., Scherz, J. A., & Strattman, K. H. (2002). Evaluating communicative abilities of a highly unintelligible pre-schooler. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 236-242.
18. Hoffman, P. R., & Norris, J. A. (2002). Phonological assessment as an integral part of language assessment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 230-235.
19. Ingram, D. (1994). Articulation testing versus conversational speech sampling: A response to Morrison and Shriberg. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 935.
20. International Phonetics Association. (1999). IPA Handbook. A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Jordan, E. P. (1960). Articulation test measures and listener ratings of articulation defectiveness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 3, 303-319.
22. Kamhi, A., & Pollock, K. (2005). Phonological disorders in children: Clinical decision making in assessment and intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.
23. Kenney, K., Prather, E., Mooney, M., & Jeruzal, N. (1984). Comparisons among three articulation sampling procedures with preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 226-231.
24. Khan, L. M. (2002). The sixth view: Assessing preschool children's articulation and phonology from the trenches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 250-254.
25. Klein, H. B. (1984). Procedure for maximizing phonological information from single word responses. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 15, 267-274.
26. Leadholm, B. J., & Miller, J. F. (1992). Language sample analysis: The Wisconsin guide. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
27. Masterson, J. J., & Bernhardt, B. (2001). Computerized Articulation and Phonology Evaluation System (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
28. McLeod, S., & Bleile, K. (2004). The ICF: A framework for setting goals for children with speech impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20, 199-219.
29. Miccio, A. W. (2002). Clinical problem solving: Assessment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 221-229.
30. Morrison, J. A., & Shriberg, L. D. (1992). Articulation testing versus conversational speech sampling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 259-273.
31. Morrison, J. A., & Shriberg, L. D. (1994). Response to Ingram letter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 936.
32. Paden, E., & Moss, S. (1985). Comparison of three phonological analysis procedures. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 103-109.
33. Paynter, E. T., & Bumpas, T. C. (1977). Imitative and spontaneous articulatory assessment of three-year-old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 17, 119-125.
34. Rvachew, S., Nowak, M., & Cloutier, C. (2004). Effect of phonemic perception training on the speech production and phonological awareness skills of children with expressive phonological delay. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 250-263.
35. Schmitt, L. S., Howard, B. H., & Schmitt, J. F. (1983). Conversational speech sampling in the assessment of articulation proficiency. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 14, 210-214.
36. Schwartz, R. G. (1992). Clinical applications of recent advances in phonological theory. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 452-479.
37. Shriberg, L. (1993). Four new speech and prosody-voice measures for genetics research and other studies in developmental phonological disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 105-140.
38. Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982). Phonological disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256-270.
39. Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1985). Continuous speech sampling for phonologic analysis of speech-delayed children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 323-334.
40. Shriberg, L. D., & Lof, G. L. (1991). Reliability studies in broad and narrow phonetic transcription. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 5, 225-279.
41. Siegel, R., Wintz, H., & Conkey, H. (1963). The influence of testing instruments on articulatory responses in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28, 67-76.
42. Tyler, A. A., & Tolberg, L. C. (2002). Speech-language assessment in the clinical setting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 215-220.
43. Wolk, L., & Meisler, A. (1998). Phonological assessment: A systematic comparison of conversation and picture naming. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 291-313.
44. Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Pond, R. (2002). Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.