The clinical evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive system with three restorative materials in children: Six-month results

General Dentistry

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 357-366

  Baghdadi, Ziad D ^a,b  

^a DAMASCUS UNIVERSITY   (Syrian Arab Republic)

^b Dental Hospital   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; DISPERSALLOY; DYRACT; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SUREFIL PACKABLE COMPOSITE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 27644471445     PISSN: 03636771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baghdadi ZD. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials. Am J Dent 2002;15:54-65.
2. Baghdadi ZD. In vitro efficacy of a one-bottle adhesive system with three restorative materials. Gen Dent 2000;48:694-699.
3. Baghdadi ZD. In vitro bonding efficacy of three restorative materials to primary dentin using a one-bottle adhesive system. Gen Dent 2001;49:624-631.
4. Baghdadi ZD. Bond strengths of Dyract AP compomer material to dentin of permanent and primary molars: Phosphoric acid versus non-rinse conditioner. J Dent Child 2003;70:145-152.
5. Baghdadi ZD. Microleakage of a single-bottle adhesive system with 3 restorative materials: In vitro study and clinical considerations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:755-763.
6. Nakabayashi N. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing;1998.
7. Mount GJ, Hume WR. A new cavity classification. Aust Dent J 1998;43:153-159.
8. Fan PL, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K, Geary R, Eichmiller FC. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:429-434.
9. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:639-645.
10. Jokstad A, Bayne S, Blunck U, Tyas M, Wilson N. Quality of dental restorations. FDI Commission Project 2-95. Int Dent J 2001;51:117-158.
11. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago:American Dental Association; 1994.
12. Christensen GJ. Don't underestimate the Class II resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:103-104.
13. Summitt JB, Della Bona A, Burgess JO. The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design. Quintessence Int 1994;25:251-257.
14. Yaman SD, Yetmez M, Turkoz E, Akkas N. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:297-302.
15. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998;26:311-317.
16. Dietschi D, Ardu S, Krejci I. Exploring the layering concepts for anterior teeth. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M, eds. Adhesion: The silent revolution in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing;2000:235-251.
17. Browning W, Myers M, Chan D, Downey M, Hackman S, Pohjola R. Using clinical research to improve clinical teaching. Dental News 2003;10:27-35.
18. Ragain JC Jr, Johnston WM. Minimal color differences for discriminating mismatch between composite and tooth color. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:41-48.
19. Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2001;17:253-259.
20. Dyract AP [package insert]. Konstanz, Germany: Dentsply Detrey;1998.
21. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime&Bond NT. Am J Dent 1999;12:77-83.
22. Lutz F, Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: A critical analysis. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:146-159.
23. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: Two-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:164-169.
24. Perry R, Kugel G, Kunzelmann KH, Flessa HP, Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: Conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1472-1477.
25. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:544-553.
26. Yip KH, Poon BK, Chu FC, Poon EC, Kong FY, Smales RJ. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: Results at 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1581-1589.
27. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: One-year results. Quintessence Int 2000;31:630-636.
28. Mazer R, Leinfelder K. Evaluating a microfill posterior composite resin. A five-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:33-38.
29. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russell CM. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:251-255.
30. Flynn M. Scanning electron microscope investigation of in vivo performance of eight composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:529-532.
31. Randall RC, Vrijhoef MM, Wilson NH. Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs. amalgam restorations in primary molars: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:337-343.