Quality of dental restorations: FDI commission project 2-95

International Dental Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 117-158

  Jokstad, Asbjorn ^a,b   Bayne, Stephen ^a   Blunck, Uwe ^a   Tyas, Martin ^a   Wilson, Nairn ^a  

^a University of Oslo ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL SURGERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035379445     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00832.x     Document Type: Article

References (298)

1. Anusavice KJ. Criteria for selection of restorative materials: properties versus technique sensitivity. In: Anusavice, K J (ed.) Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations. pp 15-56. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, 1989.
2. Mjör I A. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 1993 43: 466-472.
3. Maryniuk G A. Replacement of amalgam restorations that have marginal defects: variation and cost implications. Quintessence Int 1990 21: 311-319.
4. Bronkhorst E. Interne gegevens onderzoeklijn gezondheidszorg. Vakgroep Cariologie en Endodontologie. Nijmegen: Katolieke Universiteit, 1988.
5. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Sheldon T, Treasure E (eds). Dental Restoration: What Type of Filling? Effective Health Care 1999 5: 1-12.
6. Elderton R J. The causes of failure of restorations: a literature review. J Dent 1976 4: 257-262.
7. Elderton R J. The quality of amalgam restorations. In: Allred H (ed). Assessment of the Quality of Dental Care. pp 45-81. London: Dorriston, 1977.
8. Downer M C, O'Brien G J. Evaluating health gains from restorative dental treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994 22: 209-213.
9. Shugars D A, Bader J D. Appropriateness of care. Appropriateness of restorative treatment recommendations: a case for practice based outcomes research. J Am Coll Dentist 1992 59: 7-13.
10. Bader J D, Shugars D A. Variation, treatment outcomes, and practice guidelines in dental practice. J Dent Educ 1995 59: 61-95.
11. Friedman J W, Atchison K A. The standard of care: an ethical responsibility of public health dentistry. J Public Health Dent 1993 53: 165-169.
12. Knibbs P J. Methods of clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1997 24: 109-123.
13. Randall R C, Wilson N H F. Glassionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999 78: 628-637.
14. Bergman M A. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: a review. Aust Dent J 1999 44: 157-168.
15. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz N M. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999 15: 54-61.
16. Chadwick B L, Dummer P M, Dunstan F D, et al. What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations. Qual Health Care 1999 8: 202-207.
17. Downer M C, Azli N A, Bedi R, et al. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999 187: 432-439.
18. Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary Online. URL (1.12.2000): http://www.m-w.com/
19. Shugars D A, Bader J D. Cost implications of differences in dentists' restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent 1996 56: 219-222.
20. Osborne J W, Phillips R W, Gale E N, et al. Three-year clinical comparison of three amalgam alloy types emphasizing an appraisal of the evaluation methods used. J Am Dent Assoc 1976 93: 784-789.
21. Mahler D B, Marantz R. The effect of the operator on the clinical performance of amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc 1979 99: 38-41.
22. Borgmeijer P J, Advokaat J G, Akerboom H B. Quality control of amalgam restorations. Part II. A comparison of four non-clinical methods of evaluation. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 1983 90 (Suppl 22): 24-43.
23. Roulet J F, Reich T, Blunck U, et al. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc 1989 3: 147-158.
24. Grossman E S, Matejka J M. Amalgam marginal quality assessment: a comparison of seven methods. J Oral Rehabil 1997 24: 496-505.
25. van Amerongen W E, Eggink C O. The cervical margin of amalgam restorations: a radiographic and clinical assessment. ASDC J Dent Child 1986 53: 177-183.
26. Leinfelder K F, Taylor D F, Barkmeier W W, et al. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1986 2: 198-201.
27. Bryant R W. Comparison of three standards for quantifying occlusal loss of composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990 6: 60-62.
28. Smales R J, Creaven P J. Evaluation of clinical methods for assessing the surface roughness of restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979 42: 45-52.
29. Jokstad A. Class 2 cavity preparations and restoration performance. (Dr. thesis) Oslo: University of Oslo, Norway, 1992.
30. Cvar J F, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco: United States Dental Health Center 1971, publication no. 7902244.
31. California Dental Association. Guidelines for the assessment of clinical quality and professional performance. 3rd ed. Sacramento, CA: California Dental Association, 1995.
32. van Dijken J W. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller, and hybrid composite resin fillings. A 6-year follow-up study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986 44: 357-367.
33. Allander L, Birkhed D, Bratthall D. Quality evaluation of anterior restorations in private practice. Swed Dent J 1989 13: 141-150.
34. Lutz F U, Krejci I, Besek M. Operative dentistry: the missing clinical standards. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997 9: 541-548.
35. Carpay J J, Nieman F H, Konig K G, et al. Quality of dental restorations and dental treatment in Dutch school children. Community Dent Health 1990 7: 43-51.
36. Mjör I A, Dahl J E, Moorhead J E. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000 58: 97-101
37. Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow M F, et al. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs. dentists. Dent Mater J 1998 17: 51-58.
38. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, et al. The battle of the bonds 1995. Schweiz Mschr Zahnmed 1997 107: 37-39.
39. Lussi A, Brunner M, Portmann P, et al. Condensation pressure during amalgam placement in patients. Eur J Oral Sci 1995 103: 388-393.
40. Wasson E A, Nicholson J W. Effect of operator skill in determining the physical properties of glass-ionomer cements. Clin Mater 1994 15: 169-172.
41. Billington R W, Williams J A, Pearson G J. Variation in powder/ liquid ratio of a restorative glass-ionomer cement used in dental practice. Br Dent J 1990 169: 164-167.
42. Gjerdet N R, Hegdahl T. Porosity, strength, and mercury content of amalgam made by different dentists in their own practice. Dent Mater 1985 1: 150-153.
43. Dermann K. Untersuchungen zur Reproduzierbarkeit einiger Werkstoffprüfungen bei Amalgamen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1989 44: 764-765.
44. McCabe J F, Watts D C, Wilson H J, et al. An investigation of test-house variability in the mechanical testing of dental materials and the statistical treatment of results. J Dent 1990 18: 90-97.
45. Ferracane J L, Mitchem J C. Properties of posterior composite: results of round robin testing for a specification. Dent Mater 1994 10: 92-99.
46. Sturdevant, C M, Roberson T M, Heymann H O, et al. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 3rd ed. pp 184-205. St. Louis: Mosby, 1995.
47. Poorterman J H, Aartman I H, Kalsbeek H. Underestimation of the prevalence of approximal caries and inadequate restorations in a clinical epidemiological study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999 27: 331-337.
48. Tobi H, Groen H J, Kreulen C M, et al. Observer variation in the assessment of resin composite. Dent Mater 1998 14: 1-5.
49. Oleinisky J C, Baratieri L N, Ritter A V, et al. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 833-840.
50. Dunne S M. The limitation of visual perception in restorative dentistry. Dent Update 1993 20: 198-205.
51. Dunninger P, Einwag J, Sitter H. Reproduzierbarkeit von Messungen zur Ergebnisqualität zahnärztlicher Füllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1991 46: 212-214.
52. Kidd E A, Ricketts D N, Pitts N B. Occlusal caries diagnosis: a changing challenge for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Dent 1993 21: 323-331
53. Pitts N B. Diagnostic tools and measurements -impact on appropriate care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997 25: 24-35.
54. Horn D J, Bulan-Brady J, Hicks M L. Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade. J Endod 1998 24: 786-790.
55. Kay E J, Blinkhorn A S. A qualitative investigation of factors governing dentists' treatment philosophies. Br Dent J 1996 180: 171-176.
56. Hawthorne W S, Smales R J. Factors affecting the amount of long-term restorative dental treatment provided to 100 patients by 20 dentists in 3 Adelaide private practices. Aust Dent J 1996 41: 256-259.
57. Paterson F M, Paterson R C, Watts A, et al. Initial stages in the development of valid criteria for the replacement of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1995 23: 137-143.
58. el-Mowafy O M, Lewis D W. Restorative decision making by Ontario dentists. J Can Dent Assoc 1994 60: 305-306.
59. Bader J D, Shugars D A. Agreement among dentists' recommendations for restorative treatment. J Dent Res 1993 72: 891-896.
60. Bader J D, Shugars D A. Understanding dentists' restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent 1992 52: 102-110.
61. Drake C W, Maryniuk G A, Bentley C. Reasons for restoration replacement: differences in practice patterns. Quintessence Int 1990 21: 125-130.
62. Worthington H, Holloway P, Clarkson J, et al. Predicting which adult patients will need treatment over the next year. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997 25: 273-277.
63. Jacobsen P H. Design and analysis of clinical trials. J Dent 1988 16: 215-218.
64. Fédération Dentaire Internationale. Recommendations for clinical research protocols for dental materials. Int Dent J 1982 32: 403-423.
65. National Institutes of Health, ADA and FDA. Wychoff H D, Weigl D G. (eds). Clinical Evaluation of Dental Materials. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health Publication 1980, publication no. NIH 80-117.
66. ADA Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Recommended standard practices for clinical research protocol for dental materials and devices. J Am Dent Assoc 1972 84: 388-390.
67. ADA Council on Dental Materials, Instrument, and Equipment. American Dental Association Guidelines for Submission of Composite Resin Materials for Occlusal Class I and Class II Restorations. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1989.
68. ADA Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. American Dental Association Acceptance Program for Dentin Adhesive Materials and Enamel and Dentin Adhesive Materials. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1994.
69. Letzel H, van 't Hof M A, Marshall G W, et al. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials. J Dent Res 1997 76: 1787-1798.
70. Tyas M J. Dental materials science - the maintenance of standards. J Oral Rehabil 1992 18: 105-110.
71. NIDR, National Institute of Dental Research. Broadening the scope - long range research plan for the nineties. Bethesda: US Department of Health and Human Services 1990, publication no. NIH 90-1188.
72. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989 17 (Suppl 1): S10-S17.
73. Wilson N H F. The evaluation of materials: relationship between laboratory investigations and clinical studies. Oper Dent 1990 15: 149-155.
74. Altman D G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research, pp 455-460. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
75. Mair L H. Understanding wear in dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999 20: 19-26.
76. Dahl B L, Carlsson G E, Ekfeldt A. Occlusal wear of teeth and restorative materials. A review of classification, etiology, mechanisms of wear, and some aspects of restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand 1993 51: 299-311.
77. Freilich M A, Goldberg A J, Gilpatrick R O, et al. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years. Dent Mater 1992 8: 60-64.
78. Wilson N H F, Wilson M A, Wastell D G, et al. Performance of Occlusin in butt-joint and bevel-edged preparations: Five year results. Dent Mater 1991 7: 92-98.
79. Lutz F, Phillips R W, Roulet J F, et al. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984 63: 914-920.
80. Mair L H, Vowies R W, Cunningham J, et al. The clinical wear of three posterior composites. Dr Dent J 1990 169: 355-360.
81. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder K F, Thomas J. Effects of finishing on the in viro wear rate of a posterior composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1989 118: 333-335.
82. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, et al. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989 68: 1752-1754.
83. Johnson G H, Bales D J, Gordon G E, et al. Clinical performance of posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992 23: 705-711.
84. Wendt Jr S L, Ziemiecki T L, Leinfelder K F. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent 1996 24: 33-39.
85. Wendell J J, Vann Jr W F. Wear of composite resin restorations in primary versus permanent molar teeth. J Dent Res 1988 67: 71-74.
86. Rasmusson C G, Köhler B, Ödman P. A 3-year clinical evaluation of two composite resins in Class-II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 1998 56: 70-75.
87. Köhler B, Rasmusson C G, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000 28: 111-116.
88. Qvist V, Strom C. 11-year assessment of Class-III resin restorations completed with two restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand 1993 51: 253-262.
89. Yap A U, Tan K B, Bhole S. Comparison of aesthetic properties of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997 22: 167-172.
90. Cook W D. Optical properties of esthetic restorative materials and natural dentition. J Biomed Mater Res 1985 19: 469-488.
91. Mjor I A, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000 31: 165-179.
92. Kreulen C M, van Amerongen W E, Akerboom H B, et al. Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations. ASDC J Dent Child 1995 62: 395-400.
93. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr F R. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998 29: 5-11.
94. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, et al. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986 17: 659-664.
95. van Dijken J W, Horstedt P, Waern R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 1998 11: 165-172.
96. Koran P, Kurschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998 11: 17-22
97. King P A. Adhesive techniques. Br Dent J 1999 186: 321-326.
98. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, et al. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992 71: 1530-1540.
99. Qvist V. Resin restorations: leakage, bacteria, pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993 9: 127-152.
100. Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2000 84: 289-296.
101. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, Kremers L, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999 82: 391-397.
102. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. II. Marginal qualities. Clin Oral Investig 1997 1: 19-26.
103. Qualtrough A J, Piddock V. Fitting accuracy of indirect restorations: a review of methods of assessment. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1992 1: 57-61.
104. Roulet J F. Marginal integrityrs: clinical significance. J Dent 1994 22 (Suppl 1): S9-S12.
105. Mahler D B. The high-copper dental amalgam alloys. J Dent Res 1997 76: 537-541.
106. Osborne J W, Norman R D, Gale E N. A 14-year clinical assessment of 14 amalgam alloys. Quintessence Int 1991 22: 857-864.
107. Akerboom H B, Advokaat J G, Van Amerongen W E, et al. Long-term evaluation and rerestoration of amalgam restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993 21: 45-48.
108. Gruythuysen R J, Kreulen, C M, Tobi H, et al. 15-year evaluation of Class II amalgam restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996 24: 307-310.
109. Kreulen C M, Tobi H, Gruythuysen R J, et al. Replacement risk of amalgam treatment modalities: 15-year results. J Dent 1998 26: 627-632.
110. Bryant R W, Marzbani N, Hodge K V. Occlusal margin defects around different types of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent 1992 17: 215-221.
111. Stratis S, Bryant R W. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 1998 25: 269-278.
112. Kreulen C M, van Amerongen W E, Akerboom H B, et al. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations. ASDC J Dent Child 1993 60: 310-314.
113. Söderholm K J, Tyas M J, Jokstad A. Determinants of quality in operative dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998 9: 464-479.
114. Fukushima M, Setcos J C, Phillips R W. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1988 117: 577-583.
115. Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lambrechts P, et al. Dentin- and enamel-bonding agents. Current Opinions Dent 1992 2: 117-127.
116. Pashley D H. Dynamics of the pulpodentin complex. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996 7: 104-133.
117. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, et al. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 1998 77: 50-59.
118. Tay F R, Gwinnett A J, Pang K M, et al. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 1996 75: 1034-1044.
119. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Snauwaert J, et al. Hybridization effectiveness of a two-step versus a three-step smear layer removing adhesive system examined correlatively by TEM and AFM. J Adhesive Dent 1999 1: 7-23.
120. Uno S, Finger W J. Effect of acid etchant composition and etch duration on enamel loss and resin composite bonding. Am J Dent 1995 8: 165-169.
121. Pioch T, Stotz S, Staehle H J, et al. Applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy to dental bonding. Adv Dent Res 1997 11: 453-461.
122. Gwinnett A J. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992 5: 127-129.
123. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin.Quintessence Int 1992 23: 39-41.
124. Kanca J. Wet bonding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996 9: 273-276.
125. Tay F R, Gwinnett A J, Wei S H. Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent 1998 26: 147-156.
126. Powers J M, Finger W J, Xie J. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. Int J Prosthodont 1995 4: 28-32.
127. Barghi N, Knight G T, Berry T G. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel: a clinical study. Oper Dent 1991 16: 130-135.
128. Knight G T, Berry T G, Barghi N, et al. Effects of two methods of moisture control on marginal microleakage between resin composite and etched enamel: a clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 1993 6: 475-479.
129. Berg N G, Derand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC). Swed Dent J 1997 21: 121-127.
130. Osborne J W, Gale E N. Relationship of restoration width, tooth position, and alloy to fracture at the margins of 13- to 14-year-old amalgams. J Dent Res 1990 69: 1599-1601.
131. Osborne J W, Gale E N. Failure at the margin of amalgams as affected by cavity width, tooth position and alloys selection. J Dent Res 1981 60: 681-685.
132. Goldberg J, Munster E, Rydinge E, et al. Experimental design in the clinical evaluation of amalgam restorations. J Biomed Mater Res 1980 14: 777-788.
133. Derand T. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces. Swed Dent J 1983 7: 65-68.
134. Harris R K. Dental amalgam: success or failure? Oper Dent 1992 17: 243-252.
135. Owens B M. Replacement and initial placement of tooth colored restorations: a review and discussion. J Tenn Dent Assoc 1998 78: 26-29.
136. Maryniuk G A, Kaplan S H. Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc 1986 112: 39-45.
137. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, et al. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995 23: 329-338.
138. Kramer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, et al. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent 1999 27: 325-331.
139. Lundin S A, Andersson B, Koch G, et al. Class II composite resin restorations: a three-year clinical study of six different posterior composites. Swed Dent J 1990 14: 105-114.
140. Rasmusson C G, Lundin S A. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995 19: 173-182.
141. Dunne S M, Millar B J. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Br Dent J 1993 175: 317-321.
142. van Noort R, Davis L G. A prospective study of the survival of chemically activated anterior resin composite restorations in general dental practice: 5-year results. J Dent 1993 21: 209-215.
143. Pilebro C E, van Dijken J W, Stenberg R. Durability of tunnel restorations in general practice: a three-year multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1999 57: 35-39.
144. Meijering A C, Creugers N H, Roeters F J, et al. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998 26: 563-568.
145. Plasmans P J, Creugers N H, Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1998 77: 453-460.
146. Wilson N H, Wastell D G, Norman R D. Five-year performance of high-copper content amalgam restorations in a multiclinical trial of a posterior composite. J Dent 1996 24: 203-210.
147. Wilson N H F, Norman R D. Five-year findings of a multiclinical trial for a posterior composite. J Dent 1991 19: 153-159.
148. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, et al. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand - survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 1996 56 (Spec iss 3): 141-145
149. Wendt L K, Koch G, Birkhed D. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Swed Dent J 1998 22: 149-155.
150. Hawthorne W S, Smales R J. Factors influencing long-term restoration survival in three private dental practices in Adelaide. Aust Dent J 1997 42: 59-63.
151. Shaini F J, Shortall A C, Marquis P M. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. J Oral Rebabil 1997 24: 553-559.
152. Mahmood S, Smales R J. Longevity of dental restorations in selected patients from different practice environments. Aust Dent J 1994 39: 15-17.
153. Smales R J. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Am J Dent 1991 4: 130-133.
154. Smales R J. Longevity of low- and high-copper amalgams analyzed by preparation class, tooth site, patient age, and operator. Oper Dent 1991 16: 162-168.
155. Lundin S A, Koch G. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years. Swed Dent J 1999 23: 165-171.
156. Burke F J, Cheung S W, Mjör I A, et al. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1999 30: 234-242.
157. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999 27: 13-19.
158. Pyk N, Mejare I. Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate. Acta Odontol Scan J 1999 57: 195-200.
159. Strand G V, Nordbo H, Tveit A B, et al. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 1996 104: 384-389.
160. Stoll R, Sieweke M, Pieper K, et al. Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns - a retrospective study at a dental school clinic. Clin Oral Invest 1999 3: 100-104.
161. Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, et al. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: a 3-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 1998 2: 168-173.
162. Pelka M, Schmidt G, Petschelt A. Klinische Qualitätsbeurteilung von gegossenen Metallinlays und -onlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996 51: 268-272.
163. Friedl K H, Hiller K A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1994 19: 228-232.
164. Friedl K H, Hiller K A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995 20: 34-38.
165. Jokstad A, Mjör I A, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994 52: 234-242.
166. Smales R J, Gerke D C. Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years. Am J Dent 1992 5: 208-212.
167. Fritz U, Fischbach H, Harke I. Langzeitverweildauer von Goldgussfüllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992 47: 714-716.
168. Bentley C D, Drake C W. Longevity of restorations in a dental school clinic. J Dent Educ 1986 50: 594-600.
169. Smales R J. Effect of rubber dam isolation on restoration deterioration. Am J Dent. 1992 5: 277-279.
170. Smales R J. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival. Br Dent J 1993 174: 330-333.
171. Letzel H, van 't Hof M A, Vrijhoef M M. The influence of the condensation instrument of the clinical behaviour of amalgam restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1987 14: 133-138.
172. Jeffrey I W, Pitts N B. Finishing of amalgam restorations: to what degree is it necessary? J Dent 1989 17: 55-60.
173. Knibbs P J, Plant C G. An evaluation of a rapid setting glass ionomer cement used by general dental practitioners to restore deciduous teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990 17: 1-7.
174. van Dijken J W, Horstedt P. Effect of the use of rubber dam versus cotton rolls on marginal adaptation of composite resin fillings to acid-etched enamel. Acta Odontol Scand 1987 45: 303-308.
175. Collins C J, Bryant R W, Hodge K L. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998 26: 311-317.
176. Donly K J, Jensen M E, Triolo P, et al. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 1999 30: 163-168.
177. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997 25: 229-232.
178. McDaniel R J, Davis R D, Murchison D F, et al. Causes of failure among cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations: a clinical survey. J Am Dent Assoc 2000 131: 173-177.
179. Kerschbaum T, Paszyna C, Klapp S, et al. Verweilzeit- und Risikofaktor-analyse von festsitzendem Zahnersatz. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1991 41: 20-24.
180. Glantz P O, Nilner K, Jendresen M D, et al. Quality of fixed prosthodontics after 15 years. Acta Odontol Scand 1993 51: 247-252.
181. Dawson A S, Smales R J. Restoration longevity in an Australian defence force population. Aust Dent J 1992 37: 196-200.
182. Kroeze H J, Plasschaert A J, van 't Hof M A, et al. Prevalence and need for replacement of amalgam and composite restorations in Dutch adults. J Dent Res 1990 69: 1270-1274.
183. Wood R E, Maxymiw W G, McComb D. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients. Oper Dent 1993 18: 94-102.
184. Bentley C D, Broderius C A, Drake C W, et al. Relationship between salivary levels of Mutans streptococci and restoration longevity. Caries Res 1990 24: 298-300.
185. Elderton R J. Longitudinal study of dental treatment in the General Dental Service in Scotland. Br Dent J 1983 155: 91-96.
186. Jokstad A, Mjör I A. Analyses of long-term clinical behaviour of Class-II amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1991 49: 47-63.
187. Mjör I A, Jokstad A. Five- year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cermet and resin-based composite materials. J Dent 1993 21: 338-343.
188. Smales R J, Webster D A. Restoration deterioration related to later failure. Oper Dent 1993 18: 130-137.
189. Jokstad A, Mjör I A, Nilner K, et al. Clinical performance of three anterior restorative materials over 10 years. Quintessence Int 1994 25: 101-108.
190. Valderhaug J, Jokstad A, Ambjørnsen E, et al. Assessment of the periapical and clinical status of crowned teeth over 25 years. J Dent 1997 25: 97-105.
191. McCoy R B, Anderson M H, Lepe X, et al. Clinical success of Class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998 129: 593-599.
192. Smales R J, Webster D A, Leppard P I. Predictions of restoration deterioration. J Dent 1992 20: 215-220.
193. Kallus T, Mjör I A. Incidence of adverse effects of dental materials. Scand J Dent Res 1991 99: 236-240.
194. Mjör I A. Biological side effects to materials used in dentistry. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999 44: 146-149.
195. Stanley H R. Dental iatrogenesis. Int Dent J 1994 44: 3-18.
196. Borgmeijer P J, Kreulen C M, van Amerongen W E, et al. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with Class II composite resin restorations. ASDC J Dent Child 1991 58: 378-383.
197. Browning W D. Incidence and severity of postoperative pain following routine placement of amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int 1999 30: 484-489.
198. Brännström M. Reducing the risk of sensitivity and pulpal complications after the placement of crowns and fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 673-678.
199. Pashley D, Kim S, Hanks C T, et al. Pathobiology of the Dentin/Pulp Complex. International conference. Charlotte, North Carolina, May 25-29, 1991. Proc Finn Dent Sac 1992 88 (Suppl 1): 571-581.
200. Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci 1998 106: 696-706.
201. Svanberg M, Mjör I A, Ørstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990 69: 861-864.
202. Anonymous. Fixed prosthodontics: avoiding pulp death. Oral Health 1995 85: 47-49.
203. Gordan V V, Mjör I A, Moorhead J E. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Oper Dent 1999 24: 377-383.
204. Grieve A R, McAndrew R. A radiographic study of post-retained crowns in patients attending a dental hospital. Br Dent J 1993 174: 197-201.
205. Mahler D B, Engle JH. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2000 131: 43-50.
206. Bergenholtz G. Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000 11: 467-480.
207. Kreulen C M, van Amerongen W E, Gruythuysen R J, et al. Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect Class II resin composite inlays. ASDC J Dent Child 1993 60: 95-98.
208. Mjör I A. Dentin and pulp. In: Mjör, I A. (ed.). Reaction Patterns in Human Teeth, pp 63-74. Boca Raton: CRC Press: 1983.
209. Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res 1983 62: 904-906.
210. Smith C T, Schuman N. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int 1997 28: 457-462.
211. Ray H A, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995 28: 12-18.
212. Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, et al. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000 16: 218-221.
213. Hill A B. The environment and disease: association and causation? Proc Roy Soc Med 1965 58: 295-300.
214. Grasso J E, Nalbandian J, Sanford C, et al. Effect of restoration quality on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1985 53: 14-19.
215. Lang N P, Kaarup-Hansen D, Joss A, et al. The significance of overhanging filling margins for the health status of interdental periodontal tissues of young adults. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1988 98: 725-730.
216. Coxhead L J. The role of the general dental practitioner in the treatment of periodontal disease. N Z Dent J 1985 81: 81-85
217. Lang N P, Kiel R A, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983 10: 563-578.
218. van Dijken J W, Sjöström S, Wing K. Development of gingivitis around different types of composite resin. J Clin Periodontol 1987 14: 257-260.
219. van Dijken J W, Sjöström S. The effect of glass ionomer cement and composite resin fillings on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1991 18: 200-203.
220. Jenkins W M, Cross L J, Kinane D F. Cervical marginal fit of proximal amalgam restorations. J Dent 1994 22: 108-111.
221. Brunton P A, Wilson N H. Preparations for porcelain laminate veneers in general dental practice. Br Dent J 1998 184: 553-556.
222. Carrotte P V, Winstanley R B, Green J R. A study of the quality of impressions for anterior crowns received at a commercial laboratory. Br Dent J 1993 174: 235-240.
223. Winstanley R B, Carrotte P V, Johnson A. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges received at commercial dental laboratories. Br Dent J 1997 183: 209-213.
224. Johnson A, Winstanley R B, Northeast S E, et al. Variations in bridge construction in commercial laboratories. Restorative Dent 1991 7: 74-77.
225. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. J Clin Periodontol 1978 5: 133-151.
226. Hancock E B, Mayo C V, Schwab R R, et al. Influence of interdental contacts on periodontal status. J Periodontol 1980 51: 445-449.
227. van Dijken J W, Sjostrom S. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 1998 2: 180-183.
228. Qualtrough A J, Burke F J. A look at dental esthetics. Quintessence Int 1994 25: 7-14.
229. Rimmer S E, Mellor A C. Patients' perceptions of esthetics and technical quality in crowns and fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 155-162.
230. Abrams R A, Ayers C S, Vogt Petterson M. Quality assessment of dental restorations: a comparison by dentists and patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986 14: 317-319.
231. Lambrechts P, Willems G, Vanherle G, et al. Aesthetic limits of light-cured composite resins in anterior teeth. Int Dent J 1990 40: 149-158.
232. Tyas M J. Colour stability of composite resins: a clinical comparison. Aust Dent J 1992 37: 88-90.
233. Verdonschot E H, Oortwijn J C, Roeters F J. Aesthetic properties of three type II glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements. J Dent 1991 19: 357-361.
234. Yap A U, Tan K B, Bhole S. Comparison of aesthetic properties of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997 22: 167-712.
235. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, et al. New direct restorative materials. Int Dent J 1998 48: 3-16.
236. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1999 30: 607-614.
237. Johnston W M, Reisbick M H. Color and translucency changes during and after curing of esthetic restorative materials. Dent Mater 1997 13: 89-97.
238. Rosentritt M, Esch J, Behr M, et al. In vivo color stability of resin veneers and acrylic resin teeth in removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int 1998 29: 517-522.
239. Asmussen E, Hansen E K. Surface discoloration of restorative resins in relation to surface softening and oral hygiene. Scand J Dent Res 1986 94: 174-177.
240. Martin F E. A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent 1998 26: 239-243.
241. Poulos J G, Styner D L. Curing lights: changes in intensity output with use over time. Gen Dent 1997 45: 70-73.
242. Forsten L, Mount G J, Knight G. Observations in Australia of the use of glass ionomer cement restorative material. Aust Dent J 1994 39: 339-343.
243. Zuellig-Singer R, Bryant R W. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent. Quintessence Int 1998 29: 573-582.
244. Foster L V. Validity of clinical judgements for the presence of secondary caries associated with defective amalgam restorations. Br Dent J 1994 177: 89-93.
245. Mjör I A. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997 55: 58-63.
246. Tyas M J. Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in Class IV cavities. Aust Dent J 1990 35: 46-49.
247. Malament K A, Socransky S S. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years. Part II: Effect of thickness of Dicor material and design of tooth preparation. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81: 662-667.
248. Lemmens P, Peters M C, van 't Hof M A, et al. Influences on the bulk fracture incidence of amalgam restorations: a 7-year controlled clinical trial. Dent Mater 1987 3: 90-93.
249. Smales R J, Gerke D C, White I L. Clinical evaluation of occlusal glass ionomer, resin, and amalgam restorations. J Dent 1990 18: 243-249.
250. Malament K A, Socransky S S. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years. Part I: Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81: 23-32.
251. AbergC H, van DijkenJ W, Olofsson A L. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994 52: 140-149.
252. Klausner L H, Charbeneau G T. Amalgam restorations: a cross-sectional survey of placement and replacement. J Mich Dent Assoc 1985 67: 249-252.
253. Osborne J W, Norman R D. 13-year clinical assessment of 10 amalgam alloys. Dent Mater 1990 6: 189-194.
254. Smales R J, Webster D A, Leppard P I, et al. Prediction of amalgam restoration longevity. J Dent 1991 19: 18-23.
255. Wilder A D, May K N, Bayne S C, et al. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. Esthetic Dent 1999 11: 135-142.
256. Bayne S C, Taylor D F, Heymann H O. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992 8: 305-309.
257. Özer L, Thylstrup A. What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement? A review. Adv Dent Res 1995 9: 394-402.
258. van Dijken J W, Kieri C, Carlen M. Longevity of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999 78: 1319-1325.
259. Chestnutt I G, Jones P R, Jacobson A P, et al. Prevalence of clinically apparent recurrent caries in Scottish adolescents, and the influence of oral hygiene practices. Caries Res 1995 29: 266-271.
260. Clarkson J E, Worthington H V. Association between untreated caries and age, gender and dental attendance in adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993 21: 126-128.
261. van Dijken J W. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/ onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994 52: 368-376.
262. Hodges D J, Mangum F I, Ward M T. Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995 23: 200-204.
263. Merrett M C, Elderton R J. An in vitro study of restorative dental treatment decisions and dental caries. Br Dent J 1984 157: 128-133.
264. Kidd E A, O'Hara J W. The caries status of occlusal amalgam restorations with marginal defects. J Dent Res 1990 69: 1275-1277.
265. Söderholm K J, Antonsson D, Fischlschweiger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam/tooth interface and recurrent caries. In: Anusavice, K J (ed). Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations, pp 95-110. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, 1989.
266. Derand T, Birkhed D, Edwardsson S. Secondary caries related to various marginal gaps around amalgam restorations in vitro. Swed Dent J 1991 15: 133-138.
267. Kidd E A, Joyston-Bechal S. Essentials of Dental Caries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
268. Kidd E A, Beighton D. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 1996 75: 1942-1946.
269. Hewlett E R, Atchison K A, White S C, et al. Radiographic secondary caries prevalence in teeth with clinically defective restorations. J Dent Res 1993 72: 1604-1608.
270. Eriksen H M, Bjertness E, Hansen B F. Cross-sectional clinical study of quality of amalgam restorations, oral health and prevalence of recurrent caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986 14: 15-18.
271. Hamilton J C, Moffa J P, Ellison J A, et al. Marginal fracture not a predictor of longevity for two dental amalgam alloys. A ten year study. J Prosthet Dent 1983 50: 200-202.
272. Goldberg G J, Tanzer J, Munster E, et al. Cross-sectional clinical evaluation of recurrent caries. Restoration of marginal integrity and oral hygiene status. J Am Dent Assoc 1981 102: 635-641.
273. Bader J D, Martin J A, Shugars D A. Preliminary estimates of the incidence and consequences of tooth fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 1995 126: 1650-1654.
274. Ellis S G, Macfarlane T V, McCord J F. Influence of patient age on the nature of tooth fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1999 82: 226-230.
275. Geurtsen W. The cracked-tooth syndrome: clinical features and case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992 12: 395-405.
276. Sindel J, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, et al. Crack formation of all-ceramic crowns dependent on different core build-up and luting materials. J Dent 1999 27: 175-181.
277. Wilder A D, Boghosian A A, Bayne S C, et al. Effect of powder/liquid ratio on the clinical and laboratory performance of resin-modified glass-ionomers. J Dent 1998 26: 369-377.
278. Kemp-Scholte C M, Davidson C L. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990 69: 1240-1243.
279. Lang H, Schwan R, Nolden R. Das Verhalten von Klasse-V-Restaurationen unter Belastung. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996 51: 613-616.
280. Browning W D, Brackett W W, Gilpatrick R O. Retention of microfilled and hybrid resin-based composite in noncarious Class 5 lesions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 1999 24: 26-30.
281. Friedman M J. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure - a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998 19: 625-636.
282. Söderholm K J. Does resin based dentine bonding work? Int Dent J 1995 45: 371-381.
283. Bayne, S C, Heymann H O, Sturdevant J R, et al. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991 4: 247-250.
284. Duke E S, Robbins J W, Snyder D S. Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results. Quintessence Int 1991 22: 889-895.
285. van Dijken J W. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in Class V abrasion lesions: a four-year follow-up. Dent Mater 1994 10: 319-324.
286. van Dijken J W. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000 16: 285-291.
287. Heymann H O, Sturdevant J R, Bayne S, et al. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991 122: 41-47.
288. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987 12: 53-78.
289. Leinfelder K F. Composite resin in posterior teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1981 25: 357-364.
290. Håkestam U, Söderfeldt B, Ryden O, et al. Personality factors versus expectations and self-reported symptoms among patients awaiting advanced prosthodontic treatment. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1997 5: 105-110.
291. Lutz F, Krejci I. Direct posterior filling materials. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds). State of the Art on Posterior Filling Materials and Dentine Bonding. Proceedings of an International Symposium, pp 15-28. Leuven: Van der Poorten, 1993.
292. Newsome P R, Wright G H. A review of patient satisfaction: 1. Concepts of satisfaction. Br Dent J 1999 186: 161-165.
293. Johnson N W. Risk Markers for Oral Disease. Volume 1 Dental Caries. Markers of High and Low Risk Groups and Individuals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
294. Schwartz R S, Summitt J B, Robbins J W. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, pp 33-46. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, 1996.
295. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Textbook of Clinical Cariology. 3rd ed. pp 333-353, 393-411. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1999.
296. Carranza F Jr, Newman M G. Clinical Periodonlology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996.
297. Hall W B. Decision Making in Periodontology. 3d ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998.
298. Anusavice K J. Decision analysis in restorative dentistry. J Dent Educ 1992 56: 812-822.