Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 54-65

  Baghdadi, Ziad D ^a  

^a NONE   (Syrian Arab Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL ALLOY; FISSURE SEALANT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH FRACTURE; VISCOSITY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH FRACTURES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0036463409     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (145)

1. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, et al. Minimal intervention dentistry-A review. FDI Commosion Project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000;50:1-12.
2. Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: A new concept for operative dentistry. Quintessence Int 2000;31:527-533.
3. Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: Early lesions. Quintessence Int 2000;31:535-546.
4. Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: Advanced lesions. Quintessence Int 2000;31:621-629.
5. Christensen GJ. Should you and can you afford to bond amalgams? J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:1381-1382.
6. Bryant RW. Dental amalgams. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. London: Mosby, 1998; 107-119.
7. Elderton RJ. A perspective of the changing global scene with dental caries as the year 2000 approaches. Postgrad Dent 1992;2:50-56.
8. Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA, et al. Does the cycle of restoration lead to large restorations? J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1407-1413.
9. Anusavice KJ. Treatment regimens in preventive and restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:727-738.
10. Bayne SC, Taylor DF. Dental materials. In: Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, et al. The art and science of operative dentistry, ed 3. St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1995; 206-287.
11. Berry TG, Laswell HR, Osborne JW, et al. Width of isthmus and marginal failure of restorations of amalgam. Oper Dent 1981;6:55-58.
12. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, et al. Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:321-329.
13. Elderton RJ. The G.V. Black IADR year of oral health lecture. J Dent Res 1994;73:1794-1796.
14. Miller MB. Rest in peace, G.V. Black: Part I. Practic Periodont Aesthet Dent 1997;9:757-758.
15. Miller MB. Rest in peace, G.V. Black: Part II. Practic Periodont Aesthet Dent 1997;9:899-900.
16. Mount GJ, Hume WR. A revised classification of carious lesions by site and size. Quintessence Int 1997;28:301-303.
17. Mount GJ. Tooth preparation for restoration with plastic materials. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. London: Mosby, 1998; 121-153.
18. Bayne SC. What is the future of amalgam? Quintessence Int 1996;27:137-139.
19. Leinfelder KF. Advances in biorestorative materials: What does the future hold? J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:35-41.
20. Mount GJ. Basic principles for restorative dentistry. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. London: Mosby, 1998; 55-67.
21. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, et al. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-1391.
22. Roberson TM, Sturdevant CM, Barton RE, et al. Fundamentals in cavity preparation. In: Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann H, et al. The art and science of operative dentistry, ed 3. St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1995; 289-324.
23. Leinfelder KF. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;27:743-748.
24. Osborne JW, Summitt JB. Extension for prevention: Is it relevant today? Am J Dent 1998;11:189-196.
25. Belcher MA, Stewart GP. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:309-314.
26. Davis R, Overton JD. Efficacy of bonded and nonbonded amalgam in the treatment of teeth with incomplete fractures. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:469-478.
27. American Dental Association's Council on Access, Prevention and Interprofessional relations. Treating caries as an infectious disease. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:2S-24S.
28. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, et al. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: Results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;128:55-66.
29. Deery C, Pitts NB. The differentiation of sealant restorations from preventive fissure sealants, in subjects with clear sealants. Community Dent Health 1992;9:385-390.
30. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Richards EE, Williams JE, et al. Sealed restorations: 5-year results. Am J Dent 1992;5:5-10.
31. Waggoner WF. Managing occlusal surfaces of young permanent molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:72-76.
32. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Williams JE, Pierce KL, et al. Sealed restorations: 4-year results. Am J Dent 1991;4:43-49.
33. ADA Council on Access, Prevention and Interprofessional Relations, Council of Scientific Affairs. Dental sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:485-488.
34. Mertz-Fairhurst E, Smith CD, Williams JE, et al. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Six-year results. Quintessence Int 1992;23:827-838.
35. Houpt M, Eidelman E, Shey Z, et al. Occlusal restoration using fissure sealant instead of "extension for prevention". ASDC J Dent Child 1984;51:270-273.
36. Surmont P, Martens L, D'Hauwers R. The preventive Class II restoration: Clinical application. Quintessence Int 1991;22:211-214.
37. Osborne JW, Gale EN. Failure at the margin of amalgams as affected by cavity width, tooth position, and alloy selection. J Dent Res 1981;60: 682-685.
38. Osborne JW, Gale EN. Relationship of restoration width, tooth position, and alloy to fracture at the margins of 13-to 14-year-old amalgams. J Dent Res 1990;69:1599-1601.
39. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:38-42.
40. Sturdevant JR, Taylor DF, Leonard RH, et al. Conservative preparation designs for Class II amalgam restorations. Dent Mater 1987;3:144-148.
41. Duncalf WV, Wilson NHF. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design. Quintessence Int 1992;23:499-504.
42. Hume R What is the future of amalgam? Quintessence Int 1996;27:136-137.
43. Nicholls JI. Rounded line angles. Quintessence Int 1999;30:209-211.
44. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:257-260.
45. Arnold TJ. New amalgam restorative techniques using phase-transition cementation. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994;15:778-789.
46. Leinfelder KF. When should I use an amalgam bonding agent? (Ask the expert). J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:253-254.
47. Geursten W. The cracked-tooth syndrome: Clinical features and case reports. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:395-405.
48. Khera SC, Carpenter CW, Staley RN. Anatomy of cusps of posterior teeth and their fracture potential. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:139-147.
49. Mahler DB, Engle JH, Simms LE, et al. One-year clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:345-349.
50. Mahler DB, Engle JH. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:43-49.
51. Summitt JB, Osborne JW. Initial preparations for amalgam restorations: Extending the longevity of the tooth-restoration unit. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:67-73.
52. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:573-581.
53. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:687-701.
54. Wathen WF. Patient-centered dentistry: Always remember the focus! (Editorial). Quintessence Int 1999;30:151.
55. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
56. Christensen GJ. Don't underestimate the Class II resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:103-104.
57. Jordan RE. Esthetic composite bonding: Techniques and materials, ed 2. St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1993; 231-266.
58. Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Efficacy of beveling posterior composite resin preparations. J Esthet Dent 1990;2:70-73.
59. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997;28:135-144.
60. Liebenberg WH. The axial bevel technique: A new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2000;31:231-239.
61. Dickinson G, Leinfelder K. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:68-72.
62. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Adair SM, Sams DR, et al. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Nine-year result among children and adults. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62:97-107.
63. Wathen WF. Caries removal and repair of fractured teeth: Inexact sciences (Editorial). Quintessence Int 1999;30:587.
64. Leinfelder KF, Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today 1998;17:112-116.
65. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ. Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:234-249.
66. SureFil technical manual. Milford, DE: Dentsply/L.D. Caulk; 1998:1-23.
67. Price RB, Doyle G, Murphy D. Effects of composite thickness on the shear bond strength to dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:35-39.
68. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, et al. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-878.
69. Tjan AHL, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:62-66.
70. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:544-550.
71. Mjör IA. You pay a price (Letters). J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:16-18.
72. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
73. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: A literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000;31:165-179.
74. Wirz J, Jaeger K. Modern alternatives to amalgam: Cementable restorations and inlays. Quintessence Int 1999;30:551-556.
75. Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjor IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:245-248.
76. MacInnis WA, Ismail A, Brogan H. Placement and replacement of restorations in a military population. Can Dent Assoc J 1991;57:227-230.
77. Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Teaching Class I and Class II direct composite restorations: Results of a survey of dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1415-1421.
78. Craig RG, O'Brien WJ, Powers JM. Dental materials: Properties & manipulation, ed 6. St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1996; 55-79.
79. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and Council on Dental Benefit Programs. Posterior resin-based composites (Letters). J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:18-20.
80. Hein DK, Christensen RP, Smith SL. Three-year breakage rate of Class 2 tooth colored materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:163 (Abstr 1200).
81. Donly KJ, Jensen ME, Triolo P. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 1999;30:163-168.
82. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations: Current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997;61-77.
83. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, et al. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 2000;28:399-405.
84. Blunck U. Adhesives: principles and state of the art. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M. Adhesion: The silent revolution in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 2000; 29-44.
85. Gallo JR, Bates ML, Burgess JO. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations using three condensable composites. J Dent Res 2000;79:181 (Abstr 304).
86. Garcia-Godoy F, Toledano M, Osorio R. Microleakage of packable composites. J Dent Res 2000;79:189 (Abstr 365).
87. Liebenberg WH. Direct ceromers: Assuring restorative integrity with selective application of two viscosities. Signature 1997;4:14-21.
88. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1999;30:249-257.
89. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Jin YT. Microleakage of Class II composite restoration with flowable composite lining. J Dent Res 2000;79:182 (Abstr 308).
90. Mato GA, Ginzler BM, Neme AL, et al. Microleakage in posterior restorations. J Dent Res 2000;79:182 (Abstr 312).
91. Francci C, Nishimura RL, Cabral G, et al. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations: Different preparations of the cavosurface enamel margins. J Dent Res 2000;79:183 (Abstr 316).
92. Francci C, DePaula RJ, Moura JAP, et al. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations: In vitro comparison of restoration techniques. J Dent Res 2000;79:183 (Abstr 317).
93. Farley V, Osborne PB, Davis RD, et al. Cervical marginal integrity of Class 2 condensable composite restorations. J Dent Res 2000;79:281 (Abstr 1104).
94. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, et al. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-577.
95. Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:375-383.
96. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
97. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi Purpose-Z100 in Class II restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9:145-149.
98. Miller MB. Anecdotal, clinical evaluation: A catalyst for the evolution of dentistry. Signature 1997;4:5.
99. Miller MB, Castellanos IR. Reality. Texas: Reality Publishing Company, 1998.
100. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998;77:1435-1445.
101. Powers JM, Li D. Bond strength of light- and self-cured flowable composite to dentin. J Dent Res 2000;79:374 (Abstr 1844).
102. Schiltz MY, Cincione F, Derijk W, et al. Bond strength of single bottle adhesives to self-cured composites on dentin. J Dent Res 2000;79:374 (Abstr 1845).
103. Cardash HS, Bichacho N, Imber S, et al. A combined amalgam and composite resin restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:502-505.
104. Eidelman E, Holan G, Tanzer-Sarneh S, et al. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations. Oper Dent 1990;15:141-148.
105. Fabra-Campos H. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth using a combined amalgam-composite resin technique. Quintessence Int 1992;23:461-464.
106. Rosa BT, Perdigão J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 2000,31:353-358.
107. Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single-bottle primer/adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999;12: 222-226.
108. Baghdadi ZD. In vitro efficacy of a one-bottle adhesive system with three restorative materials. Gen Dent 2000;48:694-699.
109. Estafan D, Gultz J, Pines M, et al. Evaluation of the interface between amalgam and dentin with a single component dentin bonding system. Gen Dent 2000;48:190-192.
110. Sepetcioglu F, Ataman BA. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of cavity varnish and adhesive resin with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:136-139.
111. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:257-260.
112. Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131: 607-611.
113. Mount GJ, Bryant RW. Glass-ionomer materials. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. London: Mosby, 1998; 69-92.
114. Rothwell M, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J Dent 1998;26: 591-597.
115. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HM. Efficacy of tunnel restorations in the removal of caries. Quintessence Int 1993;24:715-719.
116. Covey D, Schulein TM, Kohout FJ. Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 118:199-202.
117. Pilebro CE, van Dijken JW, Stenberg R. Durability of tunnel restorations in general practice: A three-year multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:35-39.
118. Strand GV, Nordbo H, Leirskar J, et al. Tunnel restorations placed in routine practice and observed for 24 to 54 months. Quintessence Int 2000;31:453-460.
119. Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study. Swed Dent J 1998;22:1 -7.
120. Strand GV, Nordbo H, Tveit AB, et al. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:384-389.
121. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: A long-term pilot study over minimum of five years. J Dent 1995;23:213-215.
122. Svanberg M. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: A 3-year clinical study. Caries Res 1992;26:315-318.
123. Davidson CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:223-224.
124. Weerheijm KL, de Soet JJ, van Amerongen WE, et al. The effect of glass-ionomer cement on carious dentine: An in vitro study. Caries Res 1993;27:417-423.
125. Ribeiro CCC, Baratieri LN, Perdigão J, et al. A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth. Quintessence Int 1999;30:591-599.
126. Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, et al. Effect of moist vs. dry bonding to normal vs. caries-affected dentin with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus. J Dent Res 1999;78:1298-1303.
127. Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, et al. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: A 2-year in vivo effects. Caries Res 1999;33:130-134.
128. Knibbs P. The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoate (glass ionomer) cement used in a "sandwich" technique with a composite resin to restore Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992;172:102-107.
129. Kleitches J, Lemon RR, Jeansonne BG. Coronal microleakage in conservatively restored endodotic access preparations. J Tenn Dent Assoc 1995;75:31-34.
130. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, et al. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:21-29.
131. Same S, Mante MO, Mante FK. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations. J Clin Dent 1996;7:13-16.
132. Dietrich T, Losche AC, Losche GM, et al. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 1999;27:119-128.
133. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, et al. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 2000;28:399-405.
134. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass-ionomer cement-composite resin "sandwich" technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int 1990;21:507-512.
135. van Dijken JW. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass-ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:368-376.
136. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel. Quintessence Int 2000;31:570-578.
137. van Dijken JWV, Kieri, Carlen M. Longevity of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-1325.
138. Mount GJ. Choosing between restoration modalities. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. London: Mosby, 1998; 195-201.
139. Wathen WF. Dental restorations: Choose carefully (Editorial). Quintessence Int 2000;31:525.
140. Simonsen RJ. Move over amalgam□ at last (Editorial). Quintessence Int 1995;26:157.
141. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, et al. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1999;30:234-242.
142. Plasmans PJJM, Creugers NHJ, Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1998;77:453-460.
143. Mjör IA, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. The relative cost of different restorations in the UK. Br Dent J 1997;182:286-289.
144. Bryant RW. Composite resins. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. London: Mosby, 1998; 93-105.
145. Osborne JW, López Howell M, Marshall H. Webb and extension for prevention: A literature review. Quintessence Int 1999;30:399-403.