vHnf1 regulates specification of caudal rhombomere identity in the chick hindbrain

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 234, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 567-576

  Aragón, Ferran ^a   Vázquez Echeverría, Citlali ^a   Ulloa, Encarna ^a   Reber, Michael ^b,c   Cereghini, Silvia ^b   Alsina, Berta ^a   Giraldez, Fernando ^a   Pujades, Cristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Chick; FGF; Hindbrain; Patterning; Rhombomere; vHnf1

Indexed keywords

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 3; HEPATOCYTE NUCLEAR FACTOR 1BETA; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; NUCLEAR FACTOR I; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICK EMBRYO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYO; FGF3 GENE; GENE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOSS; HOMEOBOX; HOXB1 GENE; KROX20 GENE; MAFB GENE; NEUROMERE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VERTEBRATE; VHNF1 GENE; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHICK EMBRYO; EPITHELIUM; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 3; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HEPATOCYTE NUCLEAR FACTOR 1; NEURONS; RHOMBENCEPHALON;

ANIMALIA; DANIO RERIO; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 27444435906     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20528     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Barbacci E, Reber M, Ott MO, Breillat C, Huetz F, Cereghini S. 1999. Variant Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1 is required for visceral endoderm specification. Development 126:4795-4805.
2. Barbacci E, Chalkiadaki A, Masdeu C, Haumaitre C, Lokmane L, Loirat C, Cloarec S, Talianidis I, Bellanne-Chantelot C, Cereghini S. 2004. HNF1beta/ TCF2 mutations impair transactivation potential through altered co-regulator recruitment. Hum Mol Genet 15:3139-3149.
3. Cereghini S, Ott MO, Power S, Maury M. 1992. Expression patterns of homeoproteins HNF1 and vHNF1 in early postimplantation embryos suggest distinct and sequential roles during development. Development 116:783-797.
4. Coffinier C, Thepot D, Babinet C, Yaniv M, Barra J. 1999. Essential role for the homeoprotein vHNF1/HNF1β in visceral endoderm differentiation. Development 126:4785-4794.
5. Cordes S, Barsh G. 1994. The mouse segmentation gene kr encodes a novel basic domain-leucine zipper transcription factor. Cell 79:1025-1034.
6. Eichmann A, Grapin-Botton A, Kelly L, Graf T, Le Douarin N, Sieweke M. 1997. The expression pattern of the mafB/kr gene in birds and mice reveals that the kreisler phenotype does not represent a null mutant. Mech Dev 65:111-122.
7. Fraser S, Keynes R, Lumsden A. 1990. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344:431-435.
8. Giraldez F. 1998. Regionalized organizing activity of the neural tube revealed by the regulation of the Lmx1 in the otic vesicle. Dev Biol 203:189-200.
9. Giudicelli F, Taillebourg E, Charnay P, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P. 2001. Krox20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous mechanisms. Genes Dev 15:567-580.
10. Giudicelli F, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P, Mechta-Grigoriou F, Poquet C, Charnay P. 2003. Novel activities of MafB underlie its dual role in hindbrain segmentation and regional specification. Dev Biol 253:150-162.
11. Grapin-Botton A, Bonnin MA, McNaughto, LA, Krumlauf R, Le Douarin NM. 1995. Plasticity of the transposed rhombomeres: Hox gene induction is correlated with phenotypic modifications. Development 121: 2707-2721.
12. Guthrie S, Muchamone I, Kuroiwa A, Marshall H, Krumlauf R, Lumsden A. 1992. Neuroectodermal autonomy of Hox-1.9 expression revealed by rhombomere transpositions. Nature 356:157-159.
13. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 195:231-272.
14. Hernandez R, Rikhof H, Backmann R, Moens C. 2004. vhnf1 integrates global RA patterning and local FGF signals to direct posterior hindbrain development in zebrafish. Development 131:4511-4520.
15. Hume CR, Dodd J. 1993. Cwnt-8C: a novel Wnt gene with a potential role in primitive streak formation and hindbrain organization. Development 119:147-1160.
16. Irving C, Nieto A, DasGupta R, Charnay P, Wilkinson D. 1996. Progressive spatial restriction of Sek-1 and Krox-20 gene expression during hindbrain segmentation. Dev Biol 173:26-38.
17. Itasaki N, Bel-Vialar S, Krumlauf R. 1999. "Shocking" developments in chick embryology: electroporation and in ovo expression. Nat Cell Biol 1:E203-E207.
18. Kwak SJ, Phillips BT, Heck R, Riley B. 2002. An expanded domain of fgf3 expression in the hindbrain of zebrafish valentino mutants results in mis-patterning of the otic vesicle. Development 129:5279-5827.
19. Lecaudey V, Anselme I, Rosa F, Schneider-Maunoury S. 2004. The zebrafish Iroquois gene iro7 positions the r4/r5 boundary and controls neurogenesis in the rostral hindbrain. Development 131: 3121-3130.
20. Leger S, Brand M. 2002. Fgf8 and Fgf3 are required for zebrafish ear placode induction, maintenance and inner ear patterning. Mech Dev 119:91-108.
21. Levin M, Pagan S, Roberts D, Cooke J, Kuehn M, Tabin C. 1997. Left/right patterning signals and the independent regulation of different aspects of Situs in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 189:57-67.
22. Lumsden A, Keynes R. 1989. Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 333:424-428.
23. Lumsden A, Krumlauf R. 1996. Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274: 1109-1114.
24. Lumsden A. 2004. Segmentation and compartition in the early avian hindbrain. Mech Dev 121:1081-1088.
25. Mahmood R, Kiefer P, Guthrie S, Dickson C, Mason I. 1995. Multiple roles for FGF-3 during cranial neural development in the chicken. Development 121: 1399-1410.
26. Manzanares M, Trainor P, Nonchev S, Ariza-McNaughton L, Brodie J, Gould A, Marshall H, Morrison A, Kwan C, Sham MH, Wilkinson DG, Krumlauf R. 1999. The role of kreisler in segmentation during hindbrain development. Dev Biol 211: 220-237.
27. Manzanares M, Bel-Vialar S, Ariza-McNaughton L, Ferrett E, Marshall H, Maconochie MM, Blasi F, Krumlauf R. 2001. Independent regulation of initiation and maintenance phases of Hoxa3 expression in the vertebrate hindbrain involve auto- and cross-regulatory mechanisms. Development 128:3595-607.
28. Marín F, Charnay P. 2000. Hindbrain patterning: FGFs regulate Krox20 and mafB/kr expression in the otic/preotic region. Development 127:4925-4935.
29. Maroon H, Walshe J, Mahmood R, Kiefer P, Dickson C, Mason I. 2002. Fgf3 and Fgf8 are required together for formation of the otic placode and vesicle. Development 129: 2099-2108.
30. Maves L, Jackman W, Kimmel C. 2002. FGF3 and FGF8 mediate a rhombomere 4 signaling activity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 129:3825-3837.
31. McClintock JM, Carlson R, Mann DM, Prince V.E. 2001. Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralog group 1 genes. Development 128: 2471-2484.
32. McClintock JM, Kheirberk MA, Prince VE. 2002. Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate generetention. Development 129:2339-2354.
33. McKay I, Muchamore I, Krumlauf R, Maden M, Lumsden A, Lewis J. 1994. The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres. Development 120:2199-2111.
34. Mechta F, Giudicelli F, Pujades C, Charnay P, Yaniv M. 2003. c-jun regulation and function in the developing hindbrain. Dev Biol 258:419-431.
35. Moens CB, Yan YL, Appel B, Force AG, Kimniel GS. 1996. valentino: a zebrafish gene required for normal hindbrain segmentation. Development 122:3981-3990.
36. Moens DB, Cordes S, Giorgianni MW, Barsh GS, Kimmel CB. 1998. Equivalence in the genetic control of hindbrain segmentation between fish and mouse. Development 125:381-391.
37. Ornitz DM, Xu J, Colvin JS, McEwen DG, MacArthur CA, Coulier F, Gao G, Goldfarb M. 1996. Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. J Biol Chem 271:15292-15297.
38. Phillips B, Bolding K, Riley B. 2001. Zebrafish fgf3 and fgf8 encode redundant functions required for otic placode induction. Dev Biol 235:351-365.
39. Power S, Cereghini S. 1996. Positive regulation of the vHNF1 promoter by the orphan receptors COUP-TF1/Ear3 and COUP-TFII/Arp1. Mol Cell Biol 16:778-791.
40. Prince VE, Moens C, Kimmel CB, Ho RK. 1998. Zebrafish hox genes: expression in the hindbrain region of wild-type and mutants of the segmentation gene valentino. Development 125:393-406.
41. Rhinn M, Lun K, Amores A, Yan YL, Postlethwait J, Brand M. 2003. Cloning, expression and relationship of zebrafish gbx1 and gbx2 genes to Fgf signaling. Mech Dev 120:919-936.
42. Schneider-Maunoury S, Topilko P, Seitanidou T, Levi G, Cohen-Tannoudji M, Pournin S, Babinet C, Charnay P. 1993. Disruption of Krox-20 results in alteration of r3 and r5 in the developing hindbrain. Cell 75:1199-1214.
43. Schneider-Maunoury S, Seitanidou T, Charnay P, Lumsden A. 1997. Segmental and neuronal architecture of the hindbrain of Krox20 mouse mutants. Development 124:1215-1226.
44. Schneider-Maunoury S, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P, Charnay P. 1998. How to build a vertebrate hindbrain. Lessons from genetics. CR Acad Sci III 321:819-834.
45. Shamim H, Mason I. 1999. Expression of Fgf4 during early development of the chick embryo. Mech Dev 85:89-92.
46. Sun Z, Hopkins N. 2001. vhnf1, the MODY5 and familial GCKD-associated gene, regulates regional specification of the zebrafish gut, pronephros, and hindbrain. Genes Dev 15:3217-3229
47. Sundin OH, Eichele G. 1990. A homeodomain protein reveals the metameric nature of developing chick hindbrain. Genes Dev 4:1267-1276.
48. Studer M, Popperl H, Marshall H, Kuroiwa A, Krumlauf R. 1994. Role of a conserved retinoic acid response element in rhombomere restriction of Hoxb-1. Science 265: 1728-1732.
49. Studer M, Lumsden A, Ariza-McNaughton L, Bradley A, Krumlauf R. 1996. Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb1. Nature 384:630-634.
50. Studer M, Gavalas A, Marshall H, Ariza-McNaughton L, Rijli FM, Chambon P, Krumlauf R. 1998. Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning. Development 125:1025-1036.
51. Trainor P, Krumlauf R. 2001. Hox genes, neural crest cells and branchial arch patterning. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:698-705.
52. Voiculescu O, Taillebourg E, Pujades C, Kress C, Buart S, Charnay P, Schneider-Maunoury S. 2001. Hindbrain patterning: Krox-20 couples segmentation and specification of regional identity. Development 128:4967-4978.
53. Walshe J, Maroon H, McGonnell I, Dickson C, Mason I. 2002. Establishment of hindbrain segmental identity requires signalling by FGF3 and FGF8. Curr Biol 12: 117-1123.
54. Wiellette E, Sive H. 2003. vhnf1 and Fgf signals synergize to specify rhombomere identity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 130:3821-3829.
55. Wiellette E, Sive H. 2004. Early requirement for fgf8 function during hindbrain pattern formation in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 229:393-399.
56. Wilkinson D, Peters G, Dickson C, McMahon A. 1988. Expression of the FGF-related proto-oncogene int-2 during gastrulation and neurulation in the mouse. EMBO J 7:691-695.
57. Wilkinson D, Bhatt S, Chavrier P, Bravo R, Charnay P. 1989. Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system in the mouse. Nature 337:461-464.
58. Wilkinson D, Nieto A. 1995. Detection of messenger RNA by in situ hybridisation to tissue sections and whole mounts. Methods Enzymol 225:361-373.
59. Wilkinson D. 1995. Genetic control of segmentation in the vertebrate hindbrain. Perspect Dev Neurobiol 3:29-38
60. Wright TJ, Mansour SL. 2003. Fgf3 and Fgf10 are required for mouse otic placode induction. Development 130:3379-3390.