'Shocking' developments in chick embryology: Electroporation and in ovo gene expression

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 1, Issue 8, 1999, Pages

  Itasaki, Nobue ^a   Bel Vialar, Sophie ^a   Krumlauf, Robb ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKEN; ELECTROPORATION; EMBRYO; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE TRANSFER; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; OOCYTE; REPORTER GENE; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; ELECTROPORATION; EMBRYO; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; GENES, REPORTER; MICE; OOCYTES; ORGAN SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0040914505     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/70231     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Le Douarin, N. A biological cell labeling technique and its used in experimental embryology. Dev. Biol. 30, 217-222 (1973).
2. Couly, G. F., Coltey, P. M. & Le Douarin, N. M. The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras. Development 114, 1-15 (1992).
3. Couly, G. F., Coltey, P. M. & Le Douarin, N. M. The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates - a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117, 409-429 (1993).
4. Bronner-Fraser, M. & Fraser, S. Cell lineage analysis reveals multipotency of some avian neural crest cells. Nature 335, 161-164 (1988).
5. Fraser, S., Keynes, R. & Lumsden, A. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431-435 (1990).
6. Krull, C. E., Collazo, A., Fraser, S. E. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Segmental migration of trunk neural crest: time lapse analysis reveals a role for PNA-binding molecules. Development 121, 3733-3743 (1995).
7. Kulesa, P. Neural crest cell dynamics revealed by time-lapse video microscopy of whole chick explant cultures. Dev. Biol. 204, 327-344 (1998).
8. Petropoulos, C. & Hughes, S. Replication-competent retrovirus vectors for the transfer and expression of gene cassettes in avian cells. J. Virol. 65, 3728-3737 (1991).
9. Petropoulos, C., Payne, W., Salter, D. & Hughes, S. Using avian retroviral vectors for gene transfer. J. Virol. 66, 3391-3397 (1992).
10. Shillito, R., Saul, M., Paszkowski, J., Muller, M. & Potrykus, I. High efficiency direct gene transfer to plants. Bio/Technol. 3, 1099-1103 (1985).
11. Andreason, G. & Evans, G. Induction and expression of DNA molecules in eukaryotic cells by electroporation. Biotechniques 6, 650-660 (1988).
12. Takahashi, M. et al. Gene transfer into human leukemia cell lines by electroporation: experience with exponentially decaying and square wave pulse. Leukemia Res. 15, 507-513 (1991).
13. Muramatsu, T., Mizutani, Y., Ohmori, Y. & Okumura, J.-i. Comparison of three non-viral transfection methods for foreign gene expression in early chicken embryos in ovo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comum. 230, 376-380 (1997).
14. Nishi, T. et al. High-efficiency in vivo gene transfer using intraarterial plasmid DNA injection following in vivo electroporation. Cancer Res. 56, 1050-1055 (1996).
15. Momose, T. et al. Efficient targeting of gene expression in chick embryos by microelectroporation. Dev. Growth Differ. 41, 335-344 (1999).
16. Suemori, H. et al. A mouse embryonic stem cell line showing pluripotency of differentiation in early embryos and ubiquitous β-galactosidase expression. Cell Differ. Dev. 29, 181-186 (1990).
17. Gould, A., Itasaki, N. & Krumlauf, R. Initiation of rhombomeric Hoxb4 expression requires induction by somites and a retinoid pathway. Neuron 21, 39-51 (1998).
18. Funahashi, J.-i. et al. Role of Pax5 in the regulation of a mid-hindbrain organizer's activity. Dev. Growth Differ. 41, 59-72 (1999).
19. Akamatsu, W. et al. Mammalian ELAV-like neuronal RNA-binding proteins HuB and HuC promote neuronal development in both the central and the peripheral nervous systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9885-9890 (1999).
20. Ogino, H. & Yasuda, K. Induction of lens differentiation by activation of a bZIP transcription factor, L-Maf. Science 280, 115-118 (1998).
21. Takeuchi, J. K. et al. Tbx5 and Tbx4 genes determine the wing/leg identity of limb buds. Nature 398, 810-814 (1999).
22. Manzanares, M. et al. Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes. Development 126, 759-769 (1999).
23. Morrison, A. et al. Comparative analysis of Hoxb-4 regulation in transgenic mice. Mech. Dev. 53, 47-59 (1995).
24. Morrison, A., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Gould, A., Featherstone, M. & Krumlauf, R. HOXD4 and regulation of the group 4 paralog genes. Development 124, 3135-3146 (1997).
25. Whiting, J. et al. Multiple spatially specific enhancers are required to reconstruct the pattern of Hox-2.6 gene expression. Genes Dev. 5, 2048-2059 (1991).
26. Aparicio, S. et al. Detecting conserved regulatory elements with the model genome of the Japanese puffer fish Fugu rubripes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 1684-1688 (1995).
27. Pöpperl, H. et al. Segmental expression of Hoxb1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/Pbx. Cell 81, 1031-1042 (1995).
28. Studer, M., Pöpperl, H., Marshall, H., Kuroiwa, A. & Krumlauf, R. Role of a conserved retinoic acid response element in rhombomere restriction of Hoxb-1. Science 265, 1728-1732 (1994).
29. Aihara, H. & Miyazaki, J.-i. Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo. Nature Biotech. 16, 867-870 (1998).
30. Rols, M.-P. et al. In vivo electrically mediated protein and gene transfer in murine melanoma. Nature Biotech. 16, 168-171 (1998).
31. Sundin, O. & Eichele, G. A homeo domain protein reveals the metameric nature of the developing chick hindbrain. Genes Dev. 4, 1267-1276 (1990).
32. Maden, M. et al. Retinoic acid-binding protein and homeobox expression in rhombomeres of the chick embryo. Development 111, 35-44 (1991).