Input-based grammar pedagogy: A comparison of two possibilities

Language Learning Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 9-20

  Marsden, Emma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27344452712     PISSN: 09571736     EISSN: 17532167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09571730585200041     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allford, D., 2003. ‘Grasping the nettle’:aspects of grammar in the mother tongue and foreign languages. Language Learning Journal, 27:24–32.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K., 2000. Tense and aspect in second language acquisition:form, meaning, and use. Language Learning, 50 (1)
3. Bassey, M., Hallam, S., and Pollard, A., Fuzzy Generalisation:transforming research findings into fuzzy predictions which can inform teachers', policy-makers', and researchers' discourse and action. BERA Symposium at AERA. April122001, Seattle.
4. Benati, A., 2001. A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5 (2):95–127.
5. Benati, A., 2004. “ The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense ”. In Processing Instruction:Theory, Research, and Commentary, Edited by:VanPatten, B., Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum. in
6. Bryman, A., and Cramer, D., 1997. Quantitative Data Analysis for SPSS with Windows, London:Routledge.
7. Bygate, M., Tonkyn, A., and Williams, E., 1994. Grammar and the Language Teacher, Hemel Hempstead:Prentice Hall.
8. Chambers, G., 2000. “ Motivation and the Learners of Modern Languages ”. In New Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Modern Languages, Edited by:Green, S., 46–76. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters. in
9. Corder, S., 1978. “ Language-learner language ”. In Understanding Second and Foreign Language Learning:Issues and Approaches, Edited by:Richards, J., 71–93. Rowley, Mass.:Newbury House. in
10. DeKeyser, R., 1998. “ Beyond focus on form:cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing a second language grammar ”. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, Edited by:Doughty, C., and Williams, J., 42–63. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. in
11. DfEE. 1999. Modern Foreign Languages:The National Curriculum, London:DfEE.
12. DfES. 2003. Framework for teaching modern foreign languages:Years 7, 8 and 9, London:DfES.
13. Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D., and Berry, D., 1991. Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17:875–887.
14. Dobson, A., 1998. MFL Inspected:Reflections on inspection findings 1996–7, London:CILT.
15. Doughty, C., and Williams, J., 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
16. Ellis, R., 1999. Input-based Approaches to Teaching Grammar:A Review of Classroom-Oriented Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19:64–80.
17. Green, P., and Hecht, K., 1992. Implicit and explicit grammar:an empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13:168–184.
18. Harley, B., 1992. Patterns of second language development in French immersion. French Language Studies, 2:159–183.
19. Hawkins, E., 1996. 30 Years of Language Teaching, London:CILT.
20. Hawkins, R., 2001. Second Language Syntax, Oxford:Blackwell.
21. Howe, A., 2004. “ Developments in Approaches to Grammar in the Key Stage 3 National Strategy, or Touching the Void ”. In Presentation to the Committee on Linguistics in Education ftp://ftp.phon.ucl.ac.uk/pub/Word-Grammar/ec/howe.ppt, HMSO
22. Izumi, S., 2002. Output, input enhancement, and the Noticing Hypothesis:An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (4):541–577.
23. Krashen, S., and Terrell, T., 1983. The natural approach:Language acquisition in the classroom, New York:Alemany Press.
24. Lightbown, P., 2003. SLA research in the classroom/ SLA research for the classroom. Language Learning Journal,:4–13.
25. Macrory, G., and Stone, V., 2000. Pupil progress in the acquisition of the perfect tense in French:the relationship between knowledge and use. Language Teaching Research, 4 (1):44–82.
26. McNab, R., 1994. Avantage 3, London:Heinemann Educational.
27. Marsden, E., 2004. Teaching and Learning of French Verb Inflections:A Classroom Experiment Using Processing Instruction, University of Southampton. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
28. Mitchell, R., 1994. “ Grammar and teaching ”. In Grammar and the Language Teacher, Edited by:Bygate, M., Tonkyn, A., and Williams, E., 215–223. Hemel Hempstead:Prentice Hall. in
29. Mitchell, R., 2000. Applied linguistics and evidence-based classroom practice:the case of foreign language grammar pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,:281–303.
30. Mitchell, R., and Brumfit, C., 2001. “ The place of knowledge about language ”. In Reflections on Language and Language Learning. In honour of Arthur van Essen, Edited by:Bax, M., and Zwart, J.-W., 279–292. Amsterdam:Benjamins. in
31. Mitchell, R., and Dickson, P., 1997. “ Progression in Foreign Language Learning ”. In Centre for Language in Education Occasional Paper No. 45, University of Southampton.
32. Mitchell, R., and Hogg, I., Evaluation of ‘Best Practice’ Research in Modern Foreign Languages. Paper presented at the BERA Annual Meeting at the University of Leeds.
33. Mitchell, R., and Martin, C., 1997. Rote learning, creativity and ‘understanding’ in classroom foreign language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 1 (1):1–27.
34. Myles, F., 2003. The early development of L2 narratives:a longitudinal study. Marges Linguistiques, 2 (5) http://www.marges-linguistiques.com
35. Myles, F., “ The emergence of morpho-syntactic structure in French L2 ”. In Focus on French as a Foreign Language, Edited by:Dewaele, J., Clevedon:Multilingual Matters. in press
36. Myles, F., Hooper, J., and Mitchell, R., 1998. Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48 (3):323–363.
37. Norris, J., and Ortega, L., 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction:a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3):417–528.
38. OfSTED. 2002. Ofsted Subject Reports:Secondary Modern Foreign Languages 2000–2001, London:OfSTED.
39. OfSTED. 2004. The Key Stage 3 Strategy:evaluation of the third year, London:OfSTED.
40. Pachler, N., 2003. Foreign language teaching as an evidence-based profession?. Language Learning Journal, 27:4–14.
41. Pienemann, M., 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development:Processability Theory, Amsterdam:Benjamins.
42. QCA. 2000. Schemes of Work for Key Stage 3 French, London:Qualification and Curriculum Authority.
43. Robinson, P., 1995. Attention, Memory, and the ‘Noticing Hypothesis’. Language Learning, 45 (2):283–331.
44. Sharwood Smith, M., 1993. Input enhancement in instructed SLA:theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (2):165–180.
45. Siegel, S., 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, New York:McGraw-Hill.
46. Swain, M., 1995. “ Three functions of output in second language learning ”. In Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics, Edited by:Cook, G., and Seidlhofer, B., 125–144. Oxford:Oxford University Press. in
47. Swain, M., 2000. French immersion research in Canada:recent contributions to SLA and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20:199–212.
48. Terrell, T., 1991. The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. The Modern Language Journal, 75:52–63.
49. Truscott, J., 1998. Noticing in second language acquisition:a critical review. Second Language Research, 14 (2):103–135.
50. Turner, K., 1995. Listening in a Foreign Language:a skill we take for granted?, Pathfinder 26 London:CILT.
51. VanPatten, B., 1996. Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition, Norwood, N.J.:Ablex.
52. VanPatten, B., 2002. Processing Instruction:An Update. Language Learning, 52 (4):755–803.
53. VanPatten, B., 2004. “ Input Processing in SLA ”. In Processing Instruction:Theory, Research, and Commentary, Edited by:VanPatten, B., Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum. in
54. VanPatten, B., and Cadierno, T., 1993. Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15:225–241.