Grasping the nettle: Aspects of grammar in the mother tongue and foreign languages

Language Learning Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 24-32

  Allford, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27344432263     PISSN: 09571736     EISSN: 17532167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09571730385200051     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, J. (1983) The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge: CUP
2. Anderson, J. (1993) Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
3. Anderson, J. and Fincham, J. (1994) ‘Acquisition of procedural skills from examples.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 20: 1322-40
4. Batstone, R. (1994) Grammar. Oxford: OUP
5. Beard, R. (1999) National Literacy Strategy: Review of research and other related evidence. London: DfEE
6. Berman, R. (1979) ‘Rule of grammar or rule of thumb?’ International Review of Applied Linguistics 27: 279-302
7. Block, D. (2002) ‘Communicative language teaching revisited: discourses in conflict and foreign national teachers.’ Language Learning Journal 26: 19-26
8. Blyth, C. (1997) ‘A constructivist approach to grammar: teaching teachers to teach aspect.’ Modern Language Journal 81/1: 50-66
9. Bourne, J., Kress, G., Street, B. and Sealey, A. (1999) ‘The National Literacy Strategy: a debate.’ In O’ Brien, T. (ed.) Language and Literacies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
10. Carter, R. (ed.) (1990a) Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum: The LINC reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton
11. Carter, R. (1990b) ‘The new grammar teaching.’ In Carter, R. (ed.), pp. 69-103
12. Connor, M. (1992) ‘A processing strategy using visual representation to convey the passe compose/imparfait distinction in French.’ International Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 321-8
13. DeKeyser, R. (1998) ‘Beyond focus on form.’ In Doughty, C. and Williams, J. (eds), pp. 42-63
14. DfEE (1998) The National Literacy Strategy: Framework for teaching. London: DfEE
15. DfEE (2001) Key Stage 3 National Strategy - Framework for Teaching English: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: DfEE
16. Dickinson, T. (1999) ‘The National Literacy Project: Some reflections.’ In Hinson, M. (ed.) Surviving the Literacy Hour. Tamworth, Staffs: NASEN
17. Dodd, B., Eckhard-Black, C., Klapper, J. and White, R. (1996) Modern German Grammar: A practical guide. London: Routledge
18. Doughty, C. and Williams, J. (eds) (1998) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP
19. Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP
20. Ellis, R. (1997) Second Language Acquisition Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP
21. Givón, T. (1984) Syntax, Vol.I. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
22. Greenbaum, S. (1996) The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford: OUP
23. Halliday, M. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold
24. Han, Z.-H., Selinker, L. (1999) Error resistance: Towards an empirical pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 3: 249-75
25. Hannon, P. (2000) Reflecting on Literacy in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer
26. Harley, B. (1993) ‘Instructional strategies and second language acquisition in early French immersion.’ Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15/2: 245-70
27. Harris, G., Leung, C., and Rampton, B. (2002) ‘Globalization, diaspora and language education in England.’ In Block, D. and Cameron, D. (eds) Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 29-46
28. Hasan, R. and Perrett, G. (1994) ‘Learning to function with the other tongue.’ In Odlin, T. (ed.) Cambridge: CUP, pp. 179-226
29. Hawkins, E. (1992) ‘Awareness of language/knowledge about language in the curriculum in England and Wales.’ Language Awareness 1/1: 5-17
30. Howatt, A. (1974) ‘The background to course design. In Allen, J. and Pit Corder, S. (eds) Techniques in Applied Linguistics. The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3. London: OUP
31. Hubbard, P. (1994) ‘Non-transformational theories of grammar.’ In Odlin, T. (ed.), pp. 49-71
32. Keith, G. (1990) ‘Language study at key stage 3.’ In Carter, R. (ed.), pp. 69-103
33. Klapper, J. (1997) ‘Language learning at school and university: the great grammar debate continues (I).’ Language Learning Journal 16: 22-7
34. Klapper, J. (1998) ‘Language learning at school and university: the great grammar debate continues (II).’ Language Learning Journal 18: 22-8
35. Lang, M. and Perez, I. (1996) Modern French Grammar: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge
36. Lightbown, P. and Spada, N. (2000) ‘Do they know what they’re doing? L2 learners' awareness of LI influence.’ Language Awareness 9/4: 198-217
37. Mitchell, R. (2000) ‘Applied linguistics and evidence-based classroom practice: the case of foreign language grammar pedagogy.’ Applied Linguistics 21/3: 281-303
38. Mitchell, R. and Myles, F. (1988) Second Language Learning Theories. London: Arnold
39. Myles, F., Mitchell, R. and Hooper, J. (1998) ‘Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning.’ Language Learning 48/3: 323-63
40. Nattinger, J. and DeCarrico, J. (1992) Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP
41. Odlin, T. (1990) ‘Word order transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and constraints on foreign language learning.’ In VanPatten, B. and Lee, J. (eds) Second Language Acquisition-Foreign Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 95-117
42. Odlin, T. (ed.) (1994) Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. Cambridge: CUP
43. OFSTED (2001) The National Literacy Strategy: The third year. London: OFSTED
44. OFSTED (2002) Primary Subject Reports 2000/01: English. London: OFSTED
45. OFSTED (2003) English in Primary Schools: OFSTED subject reports series 2001/02. available at: www.ofsted.gov.uk/publications/docs/3162.doc
46. Pienemann, M. (1984) ‘Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages.’ Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6: 186-214
47. Pienemann, M. (1985) ‘Learnability and syllabus construction.’ In Hyltenstamm, K. and Pienemann, M. (eds) Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
48. QCA (1998) The Grammar Papers. London: QCA
49. QCA (1999) Not Whether but How. London: QCA
50. QCA (2000) GCSE Criteria for Modern Foreign Languages. Available at: www.qca.org.uk/nq/framework/ modern_foreign_lang.pdf
51. QCA (2001) GCE Advanced Subsidiary (AS) and Advanced (A) Level Specifications: Subject criteria for modern foreign languages. London: QCA
52. Raupach, M. (1987) ‘Procedural learning in advanced learners of a foreign language.’ In Coleman, J. and Towell, R. (eds) The Advanced Language Learner. London: CILT
53. Rutherford, W. (1987) Second Language Grammar: Learning and teaching. London: Longman
54. Smithers, R. (2002) ‘Schools cheat to boost exam results.’ The Guardian. 5 June 2002
55. Spada, N. (1997) ‘Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition.’ Language Teaching 30: 73-87
56. Stem, H. (1992) Issues and Options in Language Teaching, Allen, P. and Harley, B. (eds). Oxford: OUP
57. Towell, R. and Hawkins, R. (1994) Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
58. Turner, K. (1996) ‘The National Curriculum and course design.’ Language Learning Journal 14: 14-8
59. Turner, K. (2001) ‘The National Literacy Strategy - what’s in it for modern foreign language teachers?’ Language Learning Journal 24: 37-42
60. Van Lier, L. (2001) ‘The role of form in language learning.’ In Bax, M. and Zwart, J.-W. (eds) Reflections on Language and Language Teaching. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 253-66
61. VanPatten, B. (1996) Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
62. Westney, P. (1994) ‘Rules and pedagogical grammar.’ In Odlin, T. (ed.), pp. 72-96
63. White, J. and Ranta, L. (1999) ‘What you know and what you do. The relationship between metalinguistic performance and oral production in a second language.’ Manuscript, Concordia University
64. Widdowson, H. (1990) Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP
65. Wray, A. (2000) ‘Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: principle and practice.’ Applied Linguistics 21/4: 463-89