Phylogenetic signal in bone microstructure of sauropsids

Systematic Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 562-574

  Cubo, J ^a   Ponton, F ^a   Laurin, M ^a   De Margerie, E ^a   Castanet, J ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Archosauria; Bone histology; Diapsida; Periosteal ossification; Phylogenetically independent contrasts; Random tree length distribution; Regressions on distance matrices; Variation partitioning

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; BONE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPTILE; VASCULARIZATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIRDS; BONE AND BONES; CLASSIFICATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPTILES;

ALLIGATOR; ARCHOSAURIA; AVES; CROCODYLIDAE (ALL CROCODILES); SAURIA; SAUROPSIDA;

EID: 25444502856     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150591003461     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Amprino, R. 1947. La structure du tissu osseux envisagée comme expression de différences dans la vitesse de l'accroissement. Arch. Biol. 58:315-330.
2. Blomberg, S. P., and T. J. Garland. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: Phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative method. J . Evol. Biol. 15:899-910.
3. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
4. Böhning-Gease, K., B. Halbe, N. Lemoine, and R. Oberrath. 2000. Factors influencing the clutch size, number of broods and annual fecundity of North American and European land birds. 2:823-839.
5. Böhning-Gaese, K., and R. Oberrath. 1999. Phylogenetic effects on morphological, life-history, behavioural and ecological traits of birds. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:347-365.
6. Brochu, C.A. 1997. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. Syst. Biol. 46:479-521.
7. Caldwell, M. W. 1999. Squamate phylogeny and the relationships of snakes and mosasauroids. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 125:115-147.
8. Carter, D. R., M. Wong, and T. E. Orr. 1991. Musculoskeletal ontogeny, phylogeny, and functional adaptation. J. Biomechanics 24:3-16.
9. Casgrain, P., P. Legendre, and A. Vaudor. 2004. Le Progiciel R: Analyse multidimensionnelle de spatiale. Computer program available at: http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/BIOL/Casgrain/en/labo/R/v4/progress.html
10. Castanet, J., J. Cubo, and E. de Margerie. 2001. Signification de l'histodiversité osseusse: Le message de l'os. Biosystema 19:133-147.
11. Castanet, J., K. Curry Rogers, J. Cubo, and J.-J. Boisard. 2000. Periostal bone growth rates in extant ratites (ostriche and emu). Implications for assessing growth in dinosaurs. C. R. Biologies 323:543-550.
12. Castanet, J., A. Grandin, A. Abourachid, and A. de Ricqlès. 1996. Expression de la dynamique de croissance dans la structure de l'os périostique chez Anas platyrhynchos. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la vie/Life Sciences, Biologie et pathologie animales/Animal Biology and Pathology 319:301-308.
13. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: Sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
14. Cracraft, J. 2001. Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:459-469.
15. Cubo, J. 2003. Evidence for speciational change in the evolution of ratites (Aves: Palaeognathae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80:99-106.
16. Cubo, J. 2004. Pattern and process in constructional morphology. Evol. Dev. 6:131-133.
17. Cubo, J., D. Azagra, A. Casinos, and J. Castanet. 2002. Heterochronic detection through a function for the ontogenetic variation of bone shape. J. Theor. Biol. 215:57-66.
18. Cubo, J., and A. Casinos. 2000. Incidence and mechanical significance of pneumatization in the long bones of birds. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 130:499-510.
19. Cubo, J., E. de Margerie, and J. Castanet. 2001. Homoplastic variation of bone vascularization in birds. J. Vert. Paleont. 21:43A.
20. Cunningham, C. W., K. E. Omland, and T. H. Oakley. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: A critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:361-366.
21. Currey, J. D., and R. M. Alexander. 1985. The thickness of the walls of tubular bones. J. Zool. Lond. A 206:453-468.
22. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species, 6th edition. Oxford University Press, London.
23. Desdevises, Y., P. Legendre, L. Azouzi, and S. Morand. 2003. Quantifying phylogenetically structured environmental variation. Evolution 57:2647-2652.
24. Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., C. E. R. de Sant' Ana, and L. M. Bini. 1998. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52:1247-1262.
25. Dittmann, K. 2003. Histomorphometric analysis of primate and domestical animal long bone microstructure. Pages 215-225 in Decyphering ancient bones (G. Grupe and J. Peters, eds.). Verlag marie Leidorf GmbH, Rahden, Germany.
26. Dyke, G. J., and M. van Tuinen. 2004. The evolutionary radiation of modern birds (Neornithes): Reconciling molecules, morphology and the fossil record. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 141:153-177.
27. Edwards, S. V., and S. Naeem. 1993. The phylogenetic component of cooperative breeding in perching birds. Am. Nat. 141:754-789.
28. Ericksen, M. F. 1991. Histologic estimation of age at death using the anterior cortex of the femur. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 84:171-179.
29. Estes, R. 1982. The fossil record and early distribution of lizards. Pages 365-398 in Advances in herpetology and evolutionary biology: Essays in honor of E. E. Williams (A. G. J. Rhodin, ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
30. Estes, R., K. de Queiroz, and J. Gauthier. 1988. Phylogenetic Relationships within Squamata. Pages 119-281 in Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families (R. Estes, and G. Pregill, eds.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
31. Faith, D. P., and P. S. Cranston. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7:1-28.
32. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
33. Francillon-Vieillot, H., V. de Buffrénil, J. Castanet, J. Géraudie, F. J. Meunier, J. Y. Sire, L. Zylberberg, and A. de Ricqlès. 1990. Microstructure and Mineralisation of Vertebrate Skeletal Tissues. Pages 471-530 in Skeletal biomineralization: Patterns, processes and evolutionary trends, Volume 1 (J. G. Carter, ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
34. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160:712-726.
35. Gaffney, E. S. 1990. The comparative osteology of the Triassic turtle Proganochelys. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 194:263.
36. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41:18-32.
37. Gittleman, J. L., C. G. Anderson, M. Kot, and H.-K. Luh. 1996. Phylogenetic lability and rates of evolution: A comparison of behavorial, morphological and life history. Pages 166-205 in Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior (E. P. Martins, ed.) Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
38. Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
39. Guill, J. M., D. C. Heins, and C. S. Hood. 2003. The effect of phylogeny on interspecific body shape variation in darters (Pisces: Percidae). Syst. Biol. 52:488-500.
40. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
41. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, London.
42. Hirayama, R. 1998. Oldest known sea turtle. Nature 392:705-708.
43. Houde, P. 1986. Ostrich ancestors found in the Northern Hemisphere suggest new hypothesis of ratite origin. Nature 324:563-565.
44. Houde, P. 1987. Histological evidence for the systematic position of Hesperornis (Odontornithes: Hesperornithiformes). Auk 104:125-129.
45. Kerley, E. R. 1965. The microscopic determination of age in human bone. Am. J . Phys. Anthropol. 23:149-164.
46. Lanyon, L. E. 1984. Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling. Calcif. Tissue Int. 36:S56-S61.
47. Laurin, M. 2004. The evolution of body size, Cope's rule and the origin of amniotes. Syst. Biol. 53:594-622.
48. Laurin, M., M. Girondot, and M.-M. Loth. 2004. The evolution of long bone microanatomy and lifestyle in lissamphibians. Paleobiology 30:589-613.
49. Laurin, M., and R. R. Reisz. 1995. A revaluation of early amniote phylogeny. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 113:165-223.
50. Lee, M. S. Y. 1995. Historical burden in systematics and the interrelationships of 'Parareptiles.' Biol. Rev. 70:459-547.
51. Lee, M. S. Y. 2001. Molecules, morphology, and the monophyly of diapsid reptiles. Contrib. Zool. 70:1-18.
52. Lee, T. C., A. Staines, and D. Taylor. 2002. Bone adaptation to load: Microdamage as a stimulus for bone remodeling. J. Anat. 201:437-446.
53. Legendre, P. 2000. Comparison of permutation methods for the partial correlation and partial Mantel tests. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 67:37-73.
54. Legendre, P., F.-J. Lapointe, and P. Casgrain. 1994. Modeling brain evolution from behavior: A permutational regression approach. Evolution 48:1487-1499.
55. Livezey, B. C., and R. L. Zusi. 2001. Higher-order phylogenetics of modern aves based on comparative anatomy. Neth. J Zool. 51:179-205.
56. Maddison, W. P. 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstruction of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Zool. 40:304-314.
57. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2002. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 0.992. http://mesquiteproject. org.
58. Maddison, W. P., D. R. Maddison, and P. Midford. 2002. TreeFram package of modules for Mesquite. Version 0.992. http://mesquiteproject. org.
59. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
60. Margerie, E. de 2002. Laminar Bone as an adaptation to torsional loads in flapping flight. J. Anat. 201:521-526.
61. Margerie, E. de, J. Cubo, and J. Castanet. 2002. Bone typology and growth rate: Testing and quantifying "Amprino's rule" in the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). C. R. Biol. 325:221-230.
62. Margerie, E. de, J.-P. Robin, D. Verrier, J. Cubo, R. Groscolas, and J. Castanet. 2004. Assessing a relationship between bone microstructure and growth rate; a fluorescent labelling study in the King Penguin chick (Aptenodytes patagonicus). J. Exp. Biol. 207:869-879.
63. Margerie, E. de, S. Sanchez, J. Cubo, and J. Castanet. 2005. Torsional resistance as a principal component of the structural design of long bones: Comparative multivariate evidence in birds. Anat. Rec. 282A:49-66.
64. Mayr, G. and J. Clarke. 2003. The deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters. Cladistics 19:527-533.
65. Morand, S. 1997. Comparative analyses of continuous data: The need to be phylogenetically correct. Mem. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. 173:73-90.
66. Ott, S. M. 2002. Histomorphometric analysis of bone remodeling. Pages 303-319 in Principles of bone biology, 2nd edition, Volume 1. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
67. Padian, K. 2001. Cross-testing adaptative hypotheses: Phylogenetic analysis and the origin of bird flight. Am. Zool. 41:598-607.
68. Padian, K., and J. R. Horner. 2002. Typology versus transformation in the origin of birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:120-124.
69. Padian, K., A. de Ricqlès, and J. R. Horner. 2001. Dinosaurian growth rates and bird origins. Nature 412:405-408.
70. Paton, T., O. Haddrath, and A. J. Baker. 2002. Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences show that modern birds are not descended from transitional shorebirds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:839-846.
71. Purvis, A., and A. Rambaut. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): An Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comp. Appl. Biosc. 11:247-251.
72. Quecket, J. 1849. On the intimate structure of bone as composing the skeleton in the four great classes of animals viz., mammals, birds, reptiles and fishes, with some remarks on the great value of the knowledge of such structure in determining the affinities of minute fragments of organic remains. Trans. R. Micr. Soc. Lond. 2:46-58.
73. Rensberger, J. M., and M. Watabe. 2000. Fine structure of bone dinosaurs, birds and mammals. Nature, London 406:619-623.
74. Ricqlès, A. de and Buffrénil, V. de 2001. Bone histology, heterochronies and the return of Tetrapods to life in water: Where are we? Pages 289-310 in Secondary adaptation of Tetrapods to life in water (J. M. Mazin and V. de Buffrénil, eds.). Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany.
75. Ricqlès, A. de, J. Castanet, and H. Francillon-Vieillot. 2004. The "message" of bone tissue in palaeoherpetology. Ital. J. Zool. Suppl. 1:3-12.
76. Ricqlès, A. de, K. Padian, and J. R. Horner. 1999/2001. The bone histology of basal birds in phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives. Pages 411-426 in New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
77. Rieppel, O. 1988. The classification of Squamata. Pages 261-293 in The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Volume 1: Amphibians, reptiles, birds (M. J. Benton eds). Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
78. Rieppel, O., and R. R. Reisz. 1999. The origin and early evolution of turtles. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:1-22.
79. Rougier, G. W., M. S. de la Fuente, and A. B. Arcucci. 1995. Late Triassic turtles from South America. Science 268:855-858.
80. Rubin C., T. Gross, Y. X. Qin, S. Fritton, F. Guilak, and K. Mc Leod. 1996. Differentiation of the bone tissue remodeling response to axial and torsional loading in the turkey ulna. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 78:1523-1533.
81. Sander, P. M. 2000. Longbone histology of the Tendaguru sauropods: Implications for growth and biology. Paleobiology 26:466-488.
82. Seilacher, A. 1970. Arbeitskonzept zur Konstruktions-Morphologie. Lethaia 3:393-396.
83. Starck, J. M., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1998. Variation, constraint, and phylogeny: Comparative analysis of variation in growth. Pages 247-265 in Avian growth and development (J. M. Starck, and R. E. Ricklefs, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
84. Thomason, J. J. 1985. The relation of trabecular architecture to inferred loading patterns in the third metacarpals of the extinct equids Merychippus and Mesobippus. Paleobiology 11:323-335.
85. Unwin, D. M. 1993. Aves. Pages 717-737 in The fossil record 2 (J. M. Benton, ed.). Chapman & Hall, London.
86. van Tuinen, M., and S. B. Hedges. 2001. Calibration of avian moleular clocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:206-213.
87. Waddell, P. J., Y. Cao, M. Hasegawa, and D. P. Mindell. 1999. Assessing the cretaceous superordinal divergence times within birds and placental mammals by using whole mitochondrial protein sequences and an extended statistical framework. Syst. Biol. 48:119-137.
88. Webster, A. J., and A. Purvis. 2002. Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269:143-149.
89. Wolff, J. 1982. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. A. Hirshwald Verlag, Berlin.
90. Zardoya, R., and A. Meyer. 2001. The evolutionary position of turtles revised. Naturwissenschaften 88:193-200.
91. Zavattari, E., and I. Cellini. 1956. La minuta architettura delle ossa degli uccelli e il suo valore nella sistematica dei grandi gruppi. Monit. Zool. Ital 64:189-200.