Women's appeals for equity at American universities

Human Relations

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 763-797

  Goltz, Sonia ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness; Grievances; Informal appeals; Sex discrimination; Voice

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444450584     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018726705057173     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adams, J.S. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965, pp. 267-96.
2. Adams, J.W., Kottke, J.L. & Padgitt, J.S. Sexual harassment of university students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1983, 24, 484-90.
3. Adams-Roy, J. & Barling, J. Predicting the decision to confront or report sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1998, 19, 329-36.
4. Aisenberg, N. & Harrington, M. Women of academe; Outsiders in the sacred grove. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988.
5. Aspinwall, L.G. & Taylor, S.E. A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 1997, 121, 417-36.
6. Bachiochi, P.D. & Weiner, S.P. Qualitative data collection and analysis. In S.G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 161-83.
7. Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
8. Benjamin, E. Disparities in the salaries and appointments of academic women and men. Academe, 1999, January-February, 60-2.
9. Bergman, M.E., Langhout, R.D., Palmieri, P.A., Cortina, L.M. & Fitzgerald, L.F. The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87, 230-42.
10. Bisom-Rapp, S. Discerning form from substance: Understanding employer litigation prevention strategies. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 1999, 3, 1-66.
11. Blau, P. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.
12. Blum, T.C., Fields, D.L. & Goodman, J.S. Organization-level determinants of women in management. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 241-68.
13. Brandenburg, J.R. Sexual harassment in the university: Guidelines for establishing a grievance procedure. Signs, 1982, 8, 320-36.
14. Brooks, L. & Perot, A.R. Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1991, 15, 31-47.
15. Clermont, K.M. & Schwab, S.J. How employment discrimination plaintiffs fare in federal court. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2004, 1, 429-58.
16. Cole, S. Sex discrimination and admission to medical school, 1929-1984. American Journal of Sociology, 1986, 92, 549-67.
17. Collins, A.B., Parrish, B.K. & Collins, D.L. Gender and the tenure track: Some survey evidence. Issues in Accounting Education, 1998, 13, 277-99.
18. Cortina, L.M. & Magley, V.J. Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2003, 8, 247-65.
19. Creswell, J.W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
20. Culbertson, A.L., Rodgers, W. & Rosenfeld, P. Organizational change: The case of sexual harassment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August 1994.
21. Culbertson, A.L. & Rosenfeld, P. Assessment of sexual harassment in the active-duty Navy. Military Psychology, 1994, 6, 69-93.
22. Dey, E.L., Korn, J.S. & Sax, L.J. Betrayed by the academy: The sexual harassment of women college faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 1996, 67, 149-73.
23. Dziech, B.W. & Weiner, L. The lecherous professor: Sexual harassment on campus, 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990.
24. Edelman, L.B., Uggen, C. & Erlanger, H.S. The endogeneity of legal regulation; Grievance procedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology, 1999, 105, 406-54.
25. Fischer, A.R. & Good, G.E. Gender, self, and others: Perceptions of the campus environment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1994, 41, 343-55.
26. Fitzgerald, L.F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C.L., Gelfand, M.J. & Magley, V.J. Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82, 578-89.
27. Fitzgerald, L.F., Hulin, C.L. & Drasgow, F.D. The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: An integrated model. In G. Keita & J.J. Huvvell, Jr. (Eds), Job stress in a changing workforce: Investigating gender. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995a, pp. 55-73.
28. Fitzgerald, L.F., Shullman, S.L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., et al. The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1988, 32, 152-75.
29. Fitzgerald, L.F., Swan, S. & Fischer, K. Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 1995b, 51, 117-38.
30. Foster, M.D. Positive and negative responses to personal discrimination: Does coping make a difference? The Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 140, 93-106.
31. Gersick, C.J.G., Bartunek, J.M. & Dutton, J.E. Learning from academia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43, 1026-45.
32. Glomb, T.M., Munson, L.J., Hulin, C.L., Bergman, M.E. & Drasgow, F. Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84, 14-28.
33. Grauerholz, E. Sexual harassment in the academy: The case of women professors. In M.S. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 29-50.
34. Greenberg, J. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 1987, 12, 9-22.
35. Gruber, J.E. How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review. Sociology and Social Research, 1989, 74, 3-9.
36. Gruber, J.E. & Bjorn, L. Women's responses to sexual harassment: An analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resource models. Social Science Quarterly, 1986, 67, 814-26.
37. Gutek, B.A. Sexual harassment at work: When an organization fails to respond. In M.S. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 272-90.
38. Gutek, B.A. & Koss, M.P. Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1993, 42, 28-48.
39. Harlos, K.P. When organizational voice systems fail: More on the deaf-ear syndrome and frustration effects. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2001, 37, 324-42.
40. Heilman, M.E., Wallen, A.S., Fuchs, D. & Tamkins, M.M. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-type tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89, 416-27.
41. Hesson-McInnis, M. & Fitzgerald, L.F. Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1997, 27, 877-901.
42. Hirschman, A.O. Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.
43. Hora, M. Chalk talk - The courts and academia: Tenure discrimination claims against colleges and universities. Journal of Law and Education, 2001, April, 349-56.
44. Hulin, C.L., Fitzgerald, L.F. & Drasgow, F. Organizational influences on sexual harassment. In M.S. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 127-50.
45. Kanfer, R. Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990, pp. 75-170.
46. Keith, B., Layne, J.S., Babchuk, N. & Johnson, K. The context of scientific achievement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces, 2002, 80, 1253-82.
47. Kemp, A.A. Women's work: Degraded and devalued. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.
48. Knapp, D.E., Faley, R.H., Ekeberg, S.E. & DuBois, C.L.Z. Determinants of target responses to sexual harassment: A conceptual framework. The Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22, 687-729.
49. Kravetz, S. Work week: A special news report about life on the job and trends taking shape there. Wall Street Journal, January 19, 1999, A1.
50. Krefting, L.A. Intertwined discourses of merit and gender: Evidence from academic employment in the USA. Gender, Work, and Organization, 2003, 10, 260-78.
51. Krieger, L.H. The content of our categories: A cognitive bias approach to discrimination and equal employment opportunity, Stanford Law Review, 1995, 47, 1161-215.
52. Krippendorff, K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
53. Kulis, S. Gender segregation among college and university employees. Sociology of Education, 1997, 70, 151-73.
54. Lanier, P.A. & Tanner, J.R. A report on gender and gender-related issues in the accounting professoriate. Journal of Education for Business, 1999, 75, 76-82.
55. Lind, E.A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K.S. & Welchans, T.D. The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful-termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45, 557-90.
56. Maypole, D.E. & Skaine, R. Sexual harassment of blue collar workers. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 1982, 9, 682-95.
57. Messer-Davidow, E. Disciplining feminism: From social activism to academic discourse. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.
58. Miceli, M.P. & Near, J.P. Blowing the whistle. New York: Lexington Books, 1992.
59. Morrison, E.W. & Milliken, F.J. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25, 706-25.
60. Myers, D.J. & Dugan, K.B. Sexism in graduate school classrooms: Consequences for students and faculty. Gender and Society, 1996, 10, 330-50.
61. Nettles, M., Perna, L., Bradburn, E. & Zimbler, L. Salary, promotion, and tenure status of minority and women faculty in U.S. colleges and universities. National Center for Education Statistics Statistical Analysis Report, 2000, 173.
62. Neuman, W.L. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th edn. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
63. Nielsen, R.P. Do internal due process systems permit adequate political and moral space for ethics, voice, praxis, and community? Journal of Business Ethics, 2000, 24, 1-27.
64. O'Day, R. Intimidation rituals: Reactions to reform. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974, 10, 373-86.
65. Pacholski, S.L. Title VII in the university: The difference academic freedom makes. University of Chicago Law Review, 1992, 59, 1317.
66. Pryor, J.B., Giedd, J.L. & Williams, K.B. A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 1995, 51, 69-84.
67. Rai, K. & Critzer, J.W. Affirmative action and the university: Race, ethnicity and gender in higher education employment. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000.
68. Rama, D.V., Raghunandan, K., Logan, L.B. & Barkman, B.V. Gender differences in publications by promoted faculty. Issues in Accounting Education, 1997, 12, 353-66.
69. Reid, P.T. Perceptions of sex discrimination among female university faculty and staff. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1987, 11, 123-8.
70. Reskin, B. Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review, 1977, 47, 491-504.
71. Robinson, L.H. Institutional variation in the status of academic women. In A. Rossi & A. Calderwood (Eds), Academic women on the move. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1973, pp. 199-238.
72. Rudman, L.A., Borgida, E. & Robertson, B.A. Suffering in silence: Procedural justice versus gender socialization issues in university sexual harassment grievance procedures. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1995, 17, 519-41.
73. Siskind, T.G. & Kearns, S.P. Gender bias in the evaluation of female faculty at The Citadel: A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles, 1997, 37, 495-525.
74. Stockdale, M.S. The direct and moderating influences of sexual harassment pervasiveness, coping strategies, and gender on work-related outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1998, 22, 521-35.
75. Swim, J.K., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G. & Myers, D.G. Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender sterotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 1989, 105, 409-29.
76. Swim, J.K. & Stangor, C. Prejudice: The target's perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1998.
77. Toren, N. Would more women make a difference? In S. Stiver Lie & V.E. O'Leary (Eds), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world. London: Kogan Page, 1990.
78. Valian, V. Why so slow? The advancement of women, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
79. Wasti, S.A., Bergman, M.E., Glomb, T.M. & Drasgow, F. Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85, 766-78.
80. Wylie, A. The contexts of activism on 'climate' issues. In The Chilly Collective (Eds), Breaking anonymity: The chilly climate for women faculty. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1995, pp. 29-30.
81. Xie, Y. & Shauman, K.A. Explaining sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 1998, 63, 847-70.