Influences of the temporal nature of the applied load and the tibial baseplate material on the stress distribution in a three-dimensional model of the human knee joint containing a prosthetic replacement

Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 203-217

  Nambu, Satya Narasimha ^a   Lewis, Gladius ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Maximum principal stress; Total knee joint replacement; Von Mises stress

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; FABRICATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; POLYETHYLENES; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

APPLIED LOAD; KNEE JOINT; TIBIAL;

STRESS ANALYSIS;

ALLOY; BIOMATERIAL; NIOBIUM; POLYETHYLENE; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMUR CONDYLE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PRESSURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIBIA; TIME FACTORS; VISCOSITY; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 2542603158     PISSN: 09592989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. http://zmh.client.shareholder.com/industry.cfm.
2. D.L. Bartel, V.L. Bricknell and T.M. Wright, The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high-molecular weight components for total joint replacement, J. Bone Joint Surg. 68-A (1986), 1041-1051.
3. C.H. Huang, C.Y. Yang and C.K. Cheng, Fracture of the femoral component associated with polyethylene wear and osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty - a case study, J. Arthroplasty 14 (1999), 375-379.
4. G. Lewis, Contact stress at articular surfaces in total joint replacements. Part I: experimental methods, Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 8 (1998), 91-110.
5. G. Lewis, Contact stress at articular surfaces in total joint replacements. Part I: analytical and numerical, methods, BioMed. Mater. Eng. 8 (1998), 259-278.
6. M.J. Askew and J.L. Lewis, Analysis of model variables and fixation post length effects on stresses around a prosthesis in the proximal tibia, Trans. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 103 (1981), 239-244.
7. D.L. Bartel, A.H. Burstein, E.A. Santavicca and J.N. Insall, Performance of the tibial component in a total knee replacement: conventional and revision designs, J. Bone Joint Surg. 64-A (1982), 1026-1033.
8. R. Vasu, D.R. Carter, D.J. Schurman and G.S. Beaupre, Epiphyseal-based designs for the tibial plateau components-I. Stress analysis in the frontal plane, J. Biomech. 19 (1986), 647-662.
9. A. Garg and P.S. Walker, The effect of the nature of the interface on the bone stresses beneath tibial components, J. Biomech. 19 (1986), 957-967.
10. M. Angelides, A. Shirazi-Adl, S.C. Shrivastava and A.M. Ahmed, A stress compatible finite element for implant/cement interface analyses, Trans. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 110 (1988), 42-49.
11. R.L. Rakotomanana, P.F. Leyvraz, A. Curnier, J.H. Heegaard and P.J. Rubin, A finite element model for evaluation of tibial prosthesis-bone interface in total knee replacement, J. Biomech. 25 (1992), 1413-1424.
12. D.L. Bartel, J.J. Rawlinson, A.H. Burstein, C.S. Ranawat and W.F. Flynn, Jr., Stresses in polyethylene components of contemporary total knee replacement, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 317 (1995), 76-82.
13. F.B. Biegler, C. Wong, T.P. Harrigan and J.D. Reuben, Cement stresses under all-polyethylene tibial total knee replacements, in: Transactions of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, February 19-22, 1996, p. 727.
14. G. Lewis, V. Jonathan and S. Kambhampati, Effect of material property representation on stresses in endoprostheses, Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 8 (1998), 11-23.
15. M. Taylor, K.E. Tanner and M.A.R. Freeman, Finite element analysis of the implanted proximal tibia: a relationship between the initial cancellous bone stresses and implant migration, J. Biomech. 31 (1998), 303-310.
16. S. Sathasivam and P.S. Walker, Computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts of total knees, J. Orthop. Res. 16 (1998), 564-574.
17. A. Perillo-Marcone, D.S. Barrett and M. Taylor, The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial misalignment, J. Arthroplasty 15 (2000), 1020-1027.
18. P. Rullkoeter and S. Gabriel, Viscoelastic behavior of UHMWPE TKR components, in: Transactions of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, FL, USA, March 12-15, 2000, p. 0562.
19. D. Barrett and M. Taylor, Influence of lift-off on polyethylene stresses in TKR, in: Transactions of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA, USA, February 25-28, 2001, p. 1024.
20. J.S. Nyman, S.J. Hazelwood and J.J. Rodrigo, Effect of stem size, cement, and interlocking screws on stress shielding in revision TKA: a bone remodeling simulation, in: Transactions of the 10th Annual Symposium on Computational Methods in Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Dallas, TX, USA, February 9, 2002.
21. J.-J. Liau, C.-K. Cheng, C.-H. Huang and W.-H. Lo, The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses - a finite element analysis, Clin. Biomech. 17 (2002), 140-146.
22. S. Miyoshi, T. Takahashi, M. Ohtani, H. Yamamoto and K. Kameyama, Analysis of the shape of the tibial tray in total knee arthroplasty using a three dimension finite element model, Clin. Biomech. 17 (2002), 521-525.
23. J. Rawlinson, B. Furman, S. Li and D. Bartel, Finite element analysis of TKR captures device-dependent kinematics and wear potential, in: Transactions of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Dallas, TX, USA, February 25-28, 2002, p. 0944.
24. G.R. Plank, O.K. Muratoglu, D.M. Estok II and W.H. Harris, Adverse loading of a UHMWPE tibial tray insert: a finite element analysis, in: Transactions of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Tampa, FL, USA, April 24-27, 2002, p. 587.
25. K.H. Tan, A. New and M. Taylor, Finite element (FE) analysis on the performance range of total knee replacement (TKR) - a preliminary study, in: Transactions of the IVth World Congress on Biomechanics, Calgary, Canada, August 4-9, 2002, p. 219.
26. M.C. Forster, Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which designs last?, J. Arthroplasty 18 (2003), 265-270.
27. National Library of Medicine, USA, website, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/reesearch/visible/applications/html.
28. A.K. Mishra, J.A. Davidson, P. Kovacs and R.A. Poggie, Ti-13Nb-13Zr; a new low modulus, high strength, corrosion resistant near-beta alloy for orthopaedic implants, in: Beta Titanium Alloys for the 1990s, D. Eylon, R.R. Boyer and D.A. Koss, eds, The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, USA, 1994, pp. 61-72.
29. K. Park, S. Mishra, G. Lewis, Z. Fan, J.-Y. Rho and J.B. Park, Quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation studies on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, Biomaterials (in press, 2003).
30. T.P. Andriacchi, T.S. Stanwyck and J.O. Galante, Knee biomechanics and total knee replacement, J. Arthroplasty 1 (1986), 211-219.
31. D.E. Hurwitz, D.R. Sumner, T.P. Andriacchi and D.A. Sugar, Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution, J. Biomech. 31 (1998) 423-430.
32. M. Whittle, Gait Analysis - an Introduction, 2nd edn, Reed Educational and Professional Publishing, London, UK, 1996.
33. J.A. Brand, R.T. Trousdale, D.M. Ilstrup and W.S. Harmsen, Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses, J. Bone Joint Surg. 85-A (2003), 259-265.
34. M. Bemakiewicz and M. Viceconti, The role of parameter identification in finite element contact analyses with reference to orthopaedic biomechanics applications, J. Biomech. 35 (2002), 61-67.
35. S.H. Teoh, W.H. Chan and R. Thampuran, An elasto-plastic finite element model for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty, J. Biomech. 35 (2002), 323-330.
36. I. Hvid, S.M. Bentzen, F. Linde, L. Mosekilde and B. Pongsoitpetch, X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens, J. Biomech. 22 (1989), 837-844.
37. J.C. Rice, S.C. Cowin and J.A. Bowman, On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density, J. Biomech. 21 (1988), 155-168.
38. H.J. Refior, C. Schidlo, W. Plitz and S. Heining, Photoelastic and thermoelastic measurement of stress on the proximal femur before and after implantation of a hip prosthesis with retention of the femoral neck, Orthopaedics 25 (2002), 505-511.