Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: Which designs last?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 265-270

  Forster, M C ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

All polyethylene; Metal backed; Survival analysis; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMBASE; IMPLANT; MEDLINE; SURVIVAL RATE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037629034     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50051     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O: Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty: eight-to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop 226:6, 1988
2. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C: Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:697, 1993
3. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH: The posterior stabilised condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two- to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1317, 1982
4. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, Insall JN: Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1026, 1982
5. Lewis JL, Askew MJ, Jaycox DP: A comparative evaluation of tibial component designs of total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:129, 1982
6. Reilly D, Walker PS, Ben-Dov M, Ewald FC: Effects of tibial components on load transfer in the upper tibia. Clin Orthop 165:273, 1982
7. Rothman KJ: Estimation of confidence limits for the cumulative probability of survival in life table analysis. J Chronic Dis 31:557, 1978
8. Gill GS, Joshi AB, Mills DM: Total condylar knee arthroplasty: 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop 367:210, 1999
9. Stern SH, Insall JN: Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:980, 1992
10. Thadani PJ, Vince KG, Ortaaslan SG, et al: Ten- to 12-year follow-up of the Insall-Burstein I total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 380:17, 2000
11. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S, et al: Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: a 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop 286:94, 1993
12. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Moran MC: Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:798, 1989
13. Li PLS, Zamora J, Bentley G: The results at ten years of the Insall-Burstein II total knee replacement: clinical, radiological and survivorship studies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:647, 1999
14. Emmerson KP, Moran CG, Pinder IM: Survivorship analysis of the kinematic stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:441, 1996
15. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G: Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1163, 1988
16. van Loon CJM, Wisse MA, de Waal Malefijt MC, et al: The kinematic total knee arthroplasty: a 10- to 15-year follow-up and survival analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:48, 2000
17. Ansari S, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH: Kinematic posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee replacements: a 10-year survivorship study of 445 arthroplasties. Am J Knee Surg 11:9, 1998
18. Weir DJ, Moran CG, Pinder IM: Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty: 14-year survivorship analysis of 208 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:907, 1996
19. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD: Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system: results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:850, 1998
20. Back DL, Cannon SR, Hilton A, et al: The kinemax total knee arthroplasty: nine years' experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:359, 2001
21. Calder JDF, Ashwood N, Hollingdaie JP: Survivorship analysis of the "Performance" total knee replacement: 7-year follow-up. Int Orthop 23:100, 1999
22. Robertsson O, Scott G, Freeman MAR: Ten-year survival of the cemented Freeman-Samuelson primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:506, 2000
23. Gill GS, Joshi AB: Long-term results of kinematic condylar knee replacement: an analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:355, 2001
24. Insall JN: Historic development, classification and characteristics of knee prostheses. P. 691. In Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, et al. (eds): Surgery of the knee, ed 2. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1993
25. Puloski SKT, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, et al: Tibial post wear in posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:390, 2001
26. Laskin RS: Cemented total knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a five-year follow-up study using a prosthesis allowing both retention and resection of the posterior cruicate ligament. Knee 4:1, 1997
27. Pereira DS, Jaffe FF, Ortiguera C: Posterior cruciate ligament-sparing versus posterior cruicate ligament-sacrificing arthroplasty: functional results using the same prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 13:138, 1998
28. Gioe TJ, Bowman KR: A randomised comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components. Clin Orthop 380:108, 2000
29. Rand JA: Comparison of metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:307, 1993
30. Apel DM, Tozzi JM, Dorr LD: Clinical comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 273:243, 1991
31. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Long W: Matched-pair analysis of all-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components. J Arthroplasty 16:689, 2001
32. Insall JN, Haas SB: Complications of total knee arthroplasty. P. 912. In Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, et al. (eds): Surgery of the knee. Ed 2. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1993
33. Babis GC, Trousdale RT, Morrey BF: The effectiveness of isolated tibial insert exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:64, 2002