Analysis of the shape of the tibial tray in total knee arthroplasty using a three dimension finite element model

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 521-525

  Miyoshi, Shinya ^a   Takahashi, Toshiaki ^a   Ohtani, Masahiro ^a   Yamamoto, Hiroshi ^a   Kameyama, Kanji ^b  

^a KOCHI MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

^b Kameyama Kanji   (Japan)

Author keywords

3D finite elements; Design; Shape; Tibial component; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LIGAMENTS;

ANTHROPLASTY;

BIOMECHANICS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIBIA;

EID: 0036706603     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00064-5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beaupre G.S., Vasu R., Carter D.R., Schurman D.J. Epiphyseal-based designs for tibial plateau components. II. Stress analysis in the sagittal plane. J. Biomech. 19:1986;663-673.
2. Kurosawa H., Soudry M., Walker P.S. Forces at the implant-bone interface of condylar knee prosthesis-with special reference to the retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 58:1984;11-21.
3. Rakotomanana R.L., Leyvraz P.F., Curnier A., Heegaard J.H., Rubin P.J. A finite element model for evaluation of tibial prosthesis-bone interface in total knee replacement. J. Biomech. 25:1992;1413-1424.
4. Skinner H.B., Mabey M.F., Paganelli J.V., Meagher J.M. Failure analysis of PCA revision total knee replacement tibial component. A preliminary study using the finite element method. Orthopedics. 10:1987;581-584.
5. Vasu R., Carter D.R., Schurman D.J., Beaupre G.S. Epiphyseal-based designs for tibial plateau components. I. Stress analysis in the frontal plane. J. Biomech. 19:1986;647-662.
6. Lewis J.L., Askew M.J., Jaycox D.P. A comparative evaluation of tibial component designs of total knee prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. 64A:1982;129-135.
7. Behrens J.C., Walker P.S., Shoji H. Variations in strength and structure of cancellous bone at the knee. J. Biomech. 7:1974;201-207.
8. Vince K.G., Insall J.N., Kelly M.A. The total condylar prosthesis:10 to 12 years of a cemented knee replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. 71B:1989;793-797.
9. Dempsey A.J., Finlay J.B., Bourne R.B., Rorabeck C.H., Scott M.A., Millman J.C. Stability and anchorage considerations for cementless tibial components. J. Arthroplasty. 4:1989;223-230.
10. Ryd L., Lindstrand A., Stenstrôm A., Selvik G. Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial components: the relationship between prosthetic position and micromotion. Clin. Orthop. 251:1990;189-197.
11. Dawson J.M., Bartel D.L. Consequences of an interference fit on the fixation of porous-coated tibial components in total knee replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. 74A:1992;233-238.
12. Lee R.W., Voltz R.G., Sheridan D.C. The role of fixation and bone quality on the mechanical stability of tibial knee components. Clin. Orthop. 273:1991;177-183.
13. Stern S.H., Wills R.D., Gilbert J.L. The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 345:1997;44-52.
14. Pilliar R.M., Lee J.M., Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin. Orthop. 208:1986;108-113.
15. Bloebaum R.D., Bachus K.N., Mitchell W., Hoffman G., Hofmann A.A. Analysis of the bone surface area in resected tibia. Implications in tibial component subsidence and fixation. Clin. Orthop. 309:1994;2-10.
16. Bartel D.L., Rawlinson J.J., Burstein A.H., Ranawat C.S., Flynn W.F. Jr. Stresses in polyethylene components of contemporary total knee replacements. Clin. Orthop. 317:1995;76-82.