Contact state estimation using multiple model estimation and hidden Markov models

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4-5, 2004, Pages 399-413

  Debus, Thomas J ^a   Dupont, Pierre E ^a   Howe, Robert D ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact estimation; Contact modeling; Hidden Markov model; Machine perception; Multiple model estimation; Task network

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MARKOV PROCESSES; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SAMPLING; SENSORS;

CONTACT ESTIMATION; CONTACT MODELING; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; MACHINE PERCEPTION; MULTIPLE MODEL ESTIMATION; TASK NETWORK;

ROBOTS;

EID: 2442720088     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364904042195     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Baum, L. E., and Petrie, T. 1966. Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37:1554-1563.
2. Cao, T. H., and Sanderson, A. C. 1994. Task decomposition and analysis of robotic assembly task plans using Petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 41(6):567-583.
3. De Schutter, J., Bruyninckx, H., Dutre, S., De Geeter, J., Katupitiya, J., Demey, S., and Lefebvre, T. 1999. Estimating first-order geometric parameters and monitoring contact transitions during force controlled compliant motion. International Journal of Robotics Research 18(12):1161-1184.
4. Debus, T., Stoll, J., Howe, R., and Dupont, P. 2001. Combined human and machine perception in teleoperated assembly. Experimental Robotics VII, D. Rus and S. Singh, editors, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 51-60.
5. Delson, N., and West, H. 1996. Segmentation of task into subtasks for robot programming by human demonstration. ASME Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Boston, MA, pp. 41-47.
6. Dupont, P., Schulteis, T., Millman, P., and Howe, R. 1999. Automatic identification of environment haptic properties. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8(4):392-409.
7. Eberman, B. 1997. A model-based approach to Cartesian manipulation contact sensing. International Journal of Robotics Research 16(4):508-528.
8. Fiorini, P., Losito, S., Giancaspro, A., and Pasquariello, G. 1992. Neural networks for offline segmentation of teleoperation tasks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Glasgow, UK, Vol. 1, pp. 17-22.
9. Griebenow, B. E. 1994. Buried-waste integrated demonstration retrieval projects. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 70:402.
10. Hannaford, B., and Lee, P. 1991. Hidden Markov modal analysis of force/torque information in telemanipulation. International Journal of Robotics Research 10(5):528-539.
11. Hollerbach, M. J., and Wampler, C. M. 1996. The calibration index and taxonomy for robot kinematic calibration methods. International Journal of Robotics Research 15(6):573-591.
12. Lawson, C. L. and Hanson, R. J. 1974. Solving Least-Squares Problems, Series in Automatic Computation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Lefebvre, T., Bruyninckx, H., and De Schutter, J. 2003. Polyhedral contact formation modeling and identification for autonomous compliant motion. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 19(1):26-41.
14. McCarragher, B. J. 1994a. Force sensing from human demonstration using a hybrid dynamical model and qualitative reasoning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, Vol. 1, pp. 557-563.
15. McCarragher, B. J. 1994b. Petri net modeling for robotic assembly and trajectory planning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 41(6): 631-640.
16. McCarragher, B. J., and Asada, H. 1995. The discrete events modeling and trajectory planning of robotics assembly tasks. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 117:394-400.
17. McCarragher, B. J., and Hovland, G. E. 1998. Hidden Markov models as a process monitor in robotics assembly. International Journal of Robotics Research 17(2): 153-158.
18. Moré, J.J. 1977. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. Numerical Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, G.A. Watson, editor, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 105-116.
19. Pook, P. K., and Ballard, D. H. 1993. Recognizing teleoperated manipulations. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, Vol. 2, pp. 578-585.
20. Rabiner, L. R. 1989. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(2):257-286.
21. Rosen, J., Brown, J., Chang, L., Barreca, M., Sinanan, M., and Hannaford, B. 2002. The BlueDRAGON - a system for measuring the kinematics and the dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in vivo. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington DC, pp. 11-15.
22. Schröer, K., Uhl, L., Albright, S., and Huttenhofer, M. 1992. Ensuring solvability and analyzing results of the nonlinear robot calibration problem. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 851-858.
23. Schulteis, T., Dupont, P., and Howe, R. 1997. Experimental identification of kinematic constraints. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 2677-2682.
24. Viterbi, A. J. 1967. Errors bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimal decoding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13:260-269.