Computer-Mediated Peer Review of Student Papers

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 117-121

  Sullivan, Dave ^a   Brown, Carol E ^a   Nielson, Norma L ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442688826     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832329809601672     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, B., and Michaels, G., 1995. Random anonymous peer review of undergraduate writing [Online], Available: http://id-www.ucsb.edu/detche/library/software/peer_review.html
2. Boyer, E., 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
3. Brown, C., Nielson, N., and Sullivan, D., 1996. Enhancing business classes with the World Wide Web. Journal of Education for Business, 71 (6): 317–323.
4. Conlon, M., 1997. MOOville: The writing project's own ‘private Idaho.’. Technological Horizons in Education, 24 (8): 66–68.
5. Cready, L., 1996. Educational applications of MOOs: Preliminary report [Online]. Available: http://fehps.une.edu.au/F/s/curric/ICreedy/MOOedapp.html
6. Daedalus Group, Inc. 1997. DGI home page: Products and services [Online]. Available: http://www.daedalus.com/info/overview.html
7. Dowden, R., and Humphries, S., 1997. Using e-mail in computer assisted freshman composition and rhetoric. Technological Horizons in Education, 24 (10): 74–75.
8. Huff, S., 1997. Student ‘home page’ assignments: Ideas and opinions [Online]. Available: http://ashley.ivey.uwo.ca/∼isworld/hpaideas.htrnl
9. Johanson, T., 1996. The virtual community of an online classroom: Participant interactions in a community college writing class delivered by computer-mediated communication (CMC) Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis
10. Kay, A. C., 1995. Computers, networks, and education: The computer in the 21st century (special issue). Scientific American, 6: 148–155.
11. Khoon, K., Abd-Shukor, R., Deraman, M., and Othman, Y., 1994. Validity of peer review in selecting the best physics student. College Student Journal, 28: 119–121.
12. Lynch, D. H., and Golen, S., 1992. Peer evaluation of writing in business communication classes. Journal of Education for Business, 68: 44–48.
13. Marcoulides, G., and Simkin, M., 1991. Evaluating student papers: The case for peer review. Journal of Education for Business, 67: 80–83.
14. Marcoulides, G., and Simkin, M., 1995. The consistency of peer review in student writing projects. Journal of Education for Business, 70: 220–223.
15. Perrone, C., Repenning, A., Spencer, S., and Ambach, J., 1996. Computers in the classroom: Moving from tool to medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, [On-line]. Available: http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol2/issue3/
16. Scigliano, J., Levin, J., and Horne, G., 1996. Using HTML for organizing student projects through the Internet. Technological Horizons in Education, 21 (1): 51–56.
17. Summers, M. K., 1990. Writing across the curriculum techniques in computer information systems. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 30 (4): 43–46.