Matching derived functionally-same stimulus relations: Equivalence-equivalence and classical analogies

Psychological Record

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 255-273

  Carpentier, Franck ^a   Smeets, Paul M ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b   Stewart, Ian ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442458836     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395473     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ALEXANDER, P. A., WILLSON, V. L., WHITE, C. S., FUQUA, J. D., CLARK, G. D., WILSON, A. F., & KULIKOWICH, J. M. (1989). Development of analogical reasoning in 4- and 5-year-old children. Child Development, 4, 65-88.
2. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
3. BARNES, D., HEGARTY, N., & SMEETS, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57-83.
4. BARNES, G. M., & WHITELY, S. E. (1981). Problem restructuring processes for ill-structured verbal analogies. Memory and Cognition, 9, 411-421.
5. BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251-265.
6. BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Exemplar training and the derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 287-308.
7. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002a). Establishing transfer of compound control in children: A stimulus control analysis. The Psychological Record, 52, 139-158.
8. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002b). Matching functionally-same relations: Implications for equivalence-equivalence as a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52, 351-370.
9. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002c). Class formation of unrelated stimuli with same discriminative functions. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 3, 7-19.
10. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2003a). Matching unrelated stimuli with same discriminative functions: Training order effects. Behavioural Processes, 60, 215-226.
11. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2003b). Equivalence-equivalence as a model of analogy: Further analysis. The Psychological Record, 53, 349-372.
12. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2004). Equivalence-equivalence: Matching stimuli with same discriminative functions. The Psychological Record, 54, 145-162.
13. CULLINAN, V., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Searching for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 339-349.
14. DUBE, W. J., & MCILVANE, W. J., MAGUIRE, R. A., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1989). Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 65-76.
15. GALLAGHER, J. M., & WRIGHT, R. J. (1977). Children's solutions of verbal analogies: Extension of Piaget's concept of reflexive abstraction. Paper presented to the Society of Research in Child Development, New Orleans.
16. GENTNER, D., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1997). Reasoning and learning by analogy. American Psychologist, 52, 32-34.
17. GOLDMAN, S. R., PELLEGRINO, J. W., PARSEGHIAN, P. E., & SALLIS, R. (1982). Developmental and individual differences in verbal reasoning. Child Development, 53, 550-559.
18. GOSWAMI, U. (1992). Cognition in children. Hove (UK): Psychology Press.
19. GOSWAMI, U., & BROWN, A. L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35, 69-95.
20. GOSWAMI, U., & BROWN, A. L. (1990). Higher-order structure and relational reasoning: Contrasting analogical and thematic relations. Cognition, 36, 207-226.
21. INHELDER, B., & PIAGET, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
22. JAMES, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.
23. LEVINSON, P. J., & CARPENTER, R. L. (1974). An analysis of analogical reasoning in children. Child Development, 45, 857-861.
24. OPPENHEIMER, R. (1956). Analogy in science. American Psychologist, 11, 127-135.
25. PELEGRINO, J. W. (1985). Inductive reasoning ability. In R. G. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 195-226). New York: Freeman.
26. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (1994). Transfer of relational control in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 487-503.
27. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., & SERNA, R. W. (2003). Transfer of specific contextual functions to novel conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 383-393.
28. PIAGET, J., MONTANGERO, J., & BILLETER, J. (1977). Les correlats. In J. Piaget (Ed.), L'abstraction refléchissante (pp. 115-129). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
29. ROBERTSON, S. I. (2001). Problem solving. Hove (UK): Psychology Press.
30. ROSENBLUM, A. (1931). Kontrolltest als Pruefungsmethode der Testhomogenitaet. Zeitschrift für Angewante Psychologie, 40, 493-502.
31. SAUNDERS, R. F., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227-241.
32. SAUNDERS, R. F., DRAKE, K. M., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195-214.
33. SCHENK, J. J. (1994). Emergent relations of equivalence generated by outcome-specific consequences in conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record, 44, 537-558.
34. SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophonus Californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
35. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
36. SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
37. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
38. SMEETS, P. M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Derived stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus relations in children and adults: Assessing training order effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 130-154.
39. STERNBERG, R. J., & NIGRO, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Development, 51, 27-38.
40. STERNBERG, R. J., & RIFKIN, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 195-232.
41. STEWART, I., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2001). Understanding metaphor: A relational frame perspective. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 191-199.
42. STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381-408.
43. STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: A relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375-396.
44. VAUGHAN, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36-42.
45. WILLNER, A. (1964). An experimental analysis of analogical reasoning. Psychological Reports, 15, 479-494.
46. ZIRKLE, G. (1941). An evaluation of the postulates underlying the Babcock deterioration test. Psychological Review, 48, 261-267.