Equivalence-equivalence as a model of analogy: Further analyses

Psychological Record

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 349-371

  Carpentier, Franck ^a   Smeets, Paul M ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042729968     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). Effects of test order on intersubject variability during equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 43, 133-152.
2. ALEXANDER, P. A., WILLSON, V. L., WHITE, C. S., FUQUA, J. D., CLARK, G. D., WILSON, A. F., & KULIKOWICH, J. M. (1989). Development of analogical reasoning in 4- and 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 4, 65-88.
3. AUGUSTSON, E. M., DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (2000). Emergence of conditional stimulus relations and transfer of respondent eliciting functions among compound stimuli. The Psychological Record, 50, 745-770.
4. BAER, D. M., PETERSON, R. F., & SHERMAN, J. A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405-416.
5. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
6. BARNES, D., HEGARTY, N., & SMEETS, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57-83.
7. BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 287-308.
8. BOVET, D., & VAUCLAIR, D. (2001). Judgement of conceptual identity in monkeys. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 470-475.
9. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2000). Matching compound samples with unitary comparisons: Derived stimulus relations In adults and children. The Psychological Record, 50, 671-685.
10. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002). Matching functionally same relations: Implications for equivalence-equivalence as a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52, 351-370.
11. CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Searching for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 339-349.
12. DARCHEVILLE, J. C., LEGRAND, P., & SMEETS, P. (1998). Symétrie et transitivité dans les stimulus composés discriminatifs. Acta Comportamentalia, 6, 129-142.
13. DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence, and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 71-90). Reno, NV: Context Press.
14. FIELDS, L., VARELAS, S., REEVE, K. F., BELANICH, J., WADHWA, P., DEROSSE, P., & ROSEN, D. (2000). Effects of prior conditional discrimination, symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence testing on the emergence of new equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 443-466.
15. GALLAGHER, J. M., & WRIGHT, R. J. (1979). Piaget and the study of analogy: Structural analysis of items. In J. Margery (Ed.), Piaget and the helping professions (Vol. 8, pp. 114-119). Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
16. GOSWAMI, U. (1991). Analogical reasoning: What develops? A review of research and theory. Child Development, 62, 1-22.
17. GOSWAMI, U., & BROWN, A. L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35, 69-95.
18. GOSWAMI, U., & BROWN, A. L. (1990). Higher-order structure and relational reasoning: Contrasting analogical and thematic relations. Cognition, 36, 207-226.
19. HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Stimulus familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence or consistent nonequivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81-110.
20. LEVINSON, P. J., & CARPENTER, R. L. (1974). An analysis of analogical reasoning in children. Child Development, 45, 857-861.
21. LUNZER, E. A. (1965). Problems of formal reasoning in test situations. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), European research in child development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 30 (2, Serial No. 100).
22. PIAGET, J., MONTANGERO, J., & BILLETER, J. (1977). Les correlats. In J. Piaget (Ed.), L'Abstraction reflechissante. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
23. SAUNDERS, K. J., & WILLIAMS, D. C. (1998). Do parakeets exhibit derived stimulus control? Some thoughts on experimental control procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 321-324.
24. SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227-241.
25. SCHUSTERMAN, R., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
26. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
27. SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
28. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
29. SMEETS, P. M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & CULLINAN, V. (2000). Establishing equivalence classes with match-to-sample format and simultaneous-discrimination format conditional discrimination tasks. The Psychological Record, 50, 721-744.
30. STERNBERG, R. J., & RIFKIN, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 195-232.
31. STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381-408.
32. STOKES, T. F., & BAER, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
33. STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-598.
34. THOMPSON, R. K., & ODEN, D. L. (2000). Categorical perception and conceptual judgements by nonhuman primates: The paleological monkey and the analogical ape. Cognitive Science, 24, 363-396.