Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning

Psychological Record

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 381-408

  Stewart, Ian ^b   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a   Roche, Bryan ^b   Smeets, Paul M ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035597956     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395405     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264-267.
3. BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1993a). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617-638.
4. BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1993b). Learning to learn: The contribution of behavior analysis to connectionist models of inferential skill in humans. In G. Orchard (Ed.), Neural computing research and applications I (pp. 129-138). London: IOP.
5. BARNES, D., HEGARTY, N., & SMEETS, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57-83.
6. BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
7. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61-81.
8. BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders' commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
9. BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & CULLINAN, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner's Verbal Behavior. A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69-84.
10. BARNES-HOLMES, D., HEALY, O., & HAYES, S. C. (2001). Relational frame theory and the Relational Evaluation Procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In J. C. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
11. CARRIGAN, P., & SIDMAN, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 58, 183-204.
12. COHEN, J. D., MCWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). Psyscope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25(2), 257-271.
13. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.
14. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on Verbal Behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
15. HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno, NV: Context Press.
16. HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-270.
17. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
18. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
19. HAYES, S. C., & WILSON, K. G. (1994). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Altering the verbal support for experiential avoidance. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 289-303.
20. HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Stimulus familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81-110.
21. LEADER, G., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. (2000). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure III. The Psychological Record, 50, 63-79.
22. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus functions in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-303.
23. ROCHE, B., STEWART, I., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (1999). PsyScope: An easy-to-use graphical system for designing and controlling equivalence experiments. The Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 17, 5-7.
24. SAUNDERS, R. R., SAUNDERS, K. G., KIRBY, K. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-162.
25. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
26. STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
27. STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., & LIPKENS, R. (2001). Relations among relations: Analogies, metaphors and stories. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian approach to language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.