Prediction of loop geometries using a generalized born model of solvation effects

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 173-183

  Rapp, Chaya Sendrovic ^a,b   Friesner, Richard A ^a  

^a Department of Chemistry Center for Biomolecular Simulation Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Molecular dynamics; Monte Carlo; Protein folding; Simulated annealing; Tertiary structure

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; RIBONUCLEASE A;

ARTICLE; GEOMETRY; MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; SOLVATION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033135619     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990501)35:2<173::AID-PROT4>3.0.CO;2-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aghosh A, Rapp CS, Friesner RA. A generalized born model based on a surface integral formulation. J Phys Chem 1998;102:10983-10990.
2. Banks JL, Kaminski GA, Zhou R, Mainz DT, Berne BJ, Friesner RA. Parameterizing a polarizable force field from ab initio data: the fluctuating point charge model. J Chem Phys 1999;110:741-754.
3. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. Charmm: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 1983;4: 187-217.
4. Carlacci L, Englander SW. The loop problem in proteins: a Monte Carlo simulated annealing approach. Biopolymers 1993;33:1271-1286.
5. Carlacci L, Englander SW. Loop problem in proteins: developments on the Monte Carlo simulated annealing approach. J Comp Chem 1996;17:1002-1012.
6. Collura V, Greany PJ, Robson B. A method for rapidly assessing and refining simple solvent treatments in molecular modeling: example studies on the antigen-combining loop h2 from fab fragment mcpc603. Protein Eng. 1994;7:221-233.
7. Collura V, Higo J, Garnier J. Modeling of protein loops by simulated annealing. Protein Sci 1993;2:1502-1510.
8. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acid s and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
9. Donate LE, Rufino SD, Canard LHJ, Blundell TL. Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: a database for modeling and prediction. Protein Sci 1996;5:2600-2616.
10. Edinger SR, Cortis C, Shenkin PS, Friesner RA. Solvation free energies of peptides: comparison of approximate continuum solvation models with accurate solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J Chem Phys 1996;101:1190-1197.
11. Gunn JR, Friesner RA. Parallel implementation of a protein structure refinement algorithm. J Comp Chem 1996;17:1217-1228.
12. Halgren TA. Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J Comp Chem 1996;17:490-519.
13. Halgren TA. Merck Molecular Force Field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions. J Comp Chem 1996;17:520-552.
14. Halgren TA. Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94. J Comp Chem 1996;17:553-586.
15. Halgren TA. Merck molecular force field. V. Extension of MMFF94 using experimental data, additional computational data, and empirical rules. J Comp Chem 1996;17:616-641.
16. Halgren TA, Nachbar RB. Merck molecular force field. IV. Conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94. J Comp Chem 1996;17:587-615.
17. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the opls all-atom force field on conformational energetics and proper ties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11225-11236.
18. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr 1976;32:922-923.
19. Kirkpatrick Jr S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983;22:671.
20. Mohamadi F, Richards NG, Guida WC, Liskamp R, Lipton M, Caufield C, Chang G, Hendrickson T, Sti II WC. Macromodel-an integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules using molecular mechanics. J Comp Chem 1990;11:440.
21. Mosimann S, Meleshko R, James MNG. A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins. Proteins 1995;23:301-317.
22. Olivia B, Bates PA, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJE. An automated classification of the structure of protein loops. J Mol Biol 1997;266:814-830.
23. Pellequer JL, Chen Shu wen W. Does conformational free energy distinguish loop conformations in proteins? Biophys J 1997;73: 2359-2375.
24. Shenkin PS. Prediction and evaluation of side-chain conformations for protein backbone structures. Proteins 1996;26:323-352.
25. Smith KC, Honig B. Evaluation of the conformational free energies of loops in proteins. Proteins 1994;18:119-132.
26. Stern HA, Kaminski GA, Banks JL, Zhou R, Berne BJ, Friesner RA. Parameterizing a polarizable force field from ab initio data: dipole and combined fq-dipole models. J Chem Phys 1999 (in press).
27. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:6127.
28. Sudarsanam S, DuBose RE, March CJ, Srinivasan S. Modeling protein loops using a phi, psi database. Protein Sci 1995;4:1412-1420.
29. van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen WJC. Algorithms for macromolecular dynamics and constraint dynamics. Mol Phys 1977;34:1311-1327.
30. van Vlijmen HWT, Karplus M. pdb-Based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J Mol Biol 1997;267:975-1001.
31. Vasmatzis G, Brower R, DeLisi C. Predicting immunoglobulin-like hypervariable loops. Biopolymers 1994;34:1669-1680.
32. Vorobjev YN, Almagro JC, Hermans J. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. Proteins 1998;32:339-413.
33. Weiner KJ, Kollman PA, Nguyen DT, Case DA. An all-atom force field for simulations of proteins and nulcleic acids. Phys Rev E 1986;7:230-252.
34. Zhang H, Lai L, Wang L, Han Y, Tang Y. A fast and efficient program for modeling protein loops. Biopolymers 1997;41:61-72.
35. Zheng Q, Kyle DJ. Accuracy and reliability of the scaling-relaxation method for loop closure: an evaluation based on extensive and multiple copy conformational samplings. Proteins 1996; 24:209-217.
36. Zheng Q, Rosenfeld R, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Determining protein loop conformations using scaling relaxation techniques. Protein Sci 1993;2:1242-1248.
37. Zheng Q, Rosenfeld R, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Loop closure via bond scaling and relaxation. J Comp Chem 1993;14:556-565.