Evolution of a triplet repeat in a conifer

Genome

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 417-426

  Sokol, Kerry A ^a   Williams, Claire G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cladogenesis; Gymnosperms; Microsatellite evolution; Phylogenetic analysis

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HISTORY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PINE; SPRUCE; TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT;

ALLELES; BASE SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; NATURAL HISTORY; PHYLOGENY; PICEA; PINUS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT EXPANSION; TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEATS;

CONIFEROPHYTA; GYMNOSPERMAE; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; PICEA; REPTILIA; SPERMATOPHYTA; STROBUS;

EID: 24044509490     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/G05-004     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adams, D.C., and Jackson, J.F. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of the southern pines (Pinus subsect. Australes): biogeographical and ecological implications. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 110: 681-692.
2. Al-Rabab'ah, M.A., and Williams, C.G. 2002. Population dynamics of Pinus taeda L. based on nuclear microsatellites. For. Ecol. Manage. 163: 263-271.
3. Alvin, K. 1960. Further conifers of the Pinaceae from the Wealden Formation of Belgium. Memorial Institute of Research Science National Belgium 146: 1-39.
4. Auckland, L.D., Bui, T., Zhou, Y., Shepherd, M., and Williams, C.G. 2002. Conifer microsatellite handbook. Corporate Press, Raleigh, N.C. p. 57.
5. Dieringer, D., and Schlötter, C. 2003. Two distinct modes of microsatellite mutation processes: evidence from the complete genomic sequences of nine species. Genome Res. 13: 2242-2251.
6. Doyle, J.J., and Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
7. Ellegren, H. 2004. Microsatellites: simple sequences within complex evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5: 435-445.
8. Elsik, C.G., and Williams, C.G. 2001. Families of clustered microsatellites in a conifer genome. Mol. Genet. Genomics, 265: 535-542.
9. Elsik, C.G., Minihan, V.T., Scarpa, A.M., Hall, S.E., and Williams, C.G. 2000. Microsatellite markers from low-copy libraries. Genome, 43: 550-555.
10. Falush, D., and Iwasa, Y. 1999. Size-dependent mutability and microsatellite constraints. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 960-966.
11. Farjon, A. 1996. Biodiversity of Pinus (Pinaceae) in Mexico: speciation and paleo-endemism. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121: 365-384.
12. FitzSimmons, N.N., Moritz, C., and Moore, S.S. 1995. Conservation and dynamics of microsatellite loci over 300 million years of marine turtle evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 432-440.
13. Gordon, A.J.E. 1997. Microsatellite birth register. J. Mol. Evol. 45: 337-338.
14. Hancock, J.M. 1999. Microsatellites and other simple sequences: genomics context and mutational mechanisms. In Microsatellite evolution and applications. Edited by D.B. Goldstein and C. Schlötterer. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 1-6.
15. Hardison, R.C. 2000. Conserved noncoding sequences are reliable guides to regulatory elements. Trends Genet. 16: 369-372.
16. Hedrick, P.W. 1999. Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution, 53: 313-318.
17. Jurka, J. 2000. Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. Trends Genet. 16: 418-420.
18. Kashi, Y., and Soller, M. 1999. Functional roles of microsatellites and minisatellites. In Microsatellites: evolution and applications. Edited by D.B. Goldstein and C. Schlotterer. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 11-22.
19. Karhu, A., Dietrich, J.-H., and Savolainen, O. 2000. Rapid expansion of microsatellite sequences in pines. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 259-265.
20. Klein, J., Sato, A., Nagl, S., and O'hUingín, C. 1998. Molecular trans-species polymorphism. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System, 29: 1-21.
21. Kroutil, L.C., and Kunkel, T.A. 1999. Deletion errors generated during replication of CAG repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 3481-3486.
22. Kruglyak, S., Durrett, R.T., Schug, M.D., and Aquadro, C.F. 1998. Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 10774-10778.
23. Krupkin, A.B., Liston, A., and Strauss, S.H. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of the hard pines (Pinus subgenus Pinus, Pinaceae) from chloroplast DNA restriction site analysis. Am. J. Bot. 83: 489-498.
24. Kutil, B.L., and Williams, C.G. 2001. Triplet-repeat microsatellites shared among hard and soft pines. J. Hered. 92: 327-329.
25. Liston, A., Robinson, W.A., Oliphant, J.M., and Alvarez-Buylla, E.R. 1996. Length variation in the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region of non-flowering seed plants. Syst. Bot. 21: 109-120.
26. Liston, A., Robinson, W.A., Pinero, D., and Alvarez-Buylla, E.R. 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 95-109.
27. Messier, W., Li, S.-H., and Stewart, C.B. 1996. The birth of microsatellites. Nature (London), 381: 483.
28. Millar, C.I. 1993. Impact of the Eocene on the evolution of Pinus L. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80: 471-498.
29. Miller, C.N. 1977. Mesozoic conifers. Bot. Rev. 43: 218-272.
30. Nadir, E., Margalit, H., Gallily, T., and Ben-Sasson, S.-A. 1996. Microsatellites spreading in the human genome: evolutionary mechanisms and structural implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 6470-6475.
31. Nicholas, K.B., and Nicholas, H.B. 1997. GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Available from http://www.psc.edu/ biomed/genedoc/ [accessed 19 March 2005].
32. Paulson, H.L., and Fischbeck, K.H. 1996. Trinucleotide repeats in neurogenetic disorders. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19: 79-107.
33. Peakall, R., Gilmore, S., Keys, Morgante, M., and Rafalski, A. 1998. Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats (SSR) within the genus and other legume genera: implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1275-1287.
34. Pearson C.E., and Sinden, R.R. 1998. Trinucleotide repeat DNA structures: dynamic mutations from dynamic mutations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8: 321.
35. Price, R.A., Liston, A., and Strauss, S.H. 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. In Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Edited by D.M. Richardson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 49-65.
36. Ramsay, L., Macaulay, M., Cardle, L., Morgante, M., et al. 1999. Intimate association of microsatellite repeats with retrotransposons and other dispersed repetitive elements in barley. Plant J. 17: 415-425.
37. Rose, O., and Falush, D. 1998. A threshold size for microsatellite expansion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 613-615.
38. Rolfsmeier, M.L., Dixon, K.J., Pessoa-Brandao, L., Pelletier, R., et al. 2001. Cis-elements governing trinucleotide repeat instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 157: 1569-1579.
39. Sainudiin, R., Durrett, R.T., Aquadro, C.F., and Nielsen, R. 2004. Microsatellite mutation models: insights from a comparison of humans and chimpanzees. Genetics, 168: 383-395.
40. Schaal, B.A., Hayworth, D.A., Olson, K.M., Rauscher, J.T., and Smith, W.A. 1998. Phylogeographic studies in plants: problems and prospects. Mol. Ecol. 7: 465-474.
41. Schlötterer, C. 2000. Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma (Berlin), 109: 365-371.
42. Schlötterer, C. 2001. Genealogical inference of closely related species based on microsatellites. Genet. Res. 78: 209-212.
43. Sinden, R.R. 1999. Biological implications of the DNA structures associated with disease causing triplet repeats. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64: 346-353.
44. Strand, M., Prolla, T.A., Liskay, R.M., and Petes, T.D. 1993. Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. Nature (London), 365: 274-276.
45. Tautz, D. 1989. Hyervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 6463-6471.
46. Taylor, J.S., Durkin, J.M.H., and Breden, F. 1999. The death of a microsatellite: a phylogenetic perspective on microsatellite interruptions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 567-572.
47. Takezaki, N., and Nei, M. 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite data. Genetics, 144: 389-399.
48. Wang, X.-R., Tsmura, Y., Yoshimaru, H., Nagasaka, K., and Szmidt, A.E. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of Eurasian pines (Pinus, Pinaceae) based on chloroplast rbcL, matK, rpl20-rpsl8 spacer and trnV intron sequences. Am. J. Bot. 86: 1742-1753.
49. Wang, X.-R., Szmidt, A.E., and Nguyen, H.N. 2000. The phylogenetic position of the endemic flat-needle pine Pinus krempfii (Pinaceae) from Vietnam, based on PCR-RFLP analysis of the chloroplast DNA. Plant Syst. Evol. 220: 21-36.
50. Wierdl, M., Dominska, M., and Petes, T.D. 1997. Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on the length of the microsatellite. Genetics, 146: 769-779.
51. Wilder, J., and Hollocher, H. 2001. Mobile elements and the genesis of microsatellites in dipterans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 384-392.
52. Xu, X., Peng, M., Fang, Z., and Xu, X. 2000. The direction of microsatellite mutations is dependent upon mutation length. Nat. Genet. 24: 396-399.
53. Young, E.T., Sloan, J.S., and Van Riper, K. 2000. Trinucleotide repeats are clustered in regulatory genes in Saccaromyces cerevisae. Genetics, 154: 1053-1068.
54. Zhu, Y., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. 2000a. A phylogenetic perspective on sequence evolution in microsatellite loci. J. Mol. Evol. 50: 324-338.
55. Zhu, Y., Strassmann, J.E., and Queller, D.C. 2000b. Insertions, substitutions and the orgin of microsatellites. Genet. Res. 76: 227-236.