Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the benefits

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 156-164

  Cairncross, Sandra ^a   Mannion, Mike ^b  

^a EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035343799     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290110035428     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aldrich, F, Rogers, Y and Scaife, M (1998) Getting to grips with interactivity: helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-Roms, British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 4, 321-332.
2. Ausubel, D Novak J and Hanesian H (1978) Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, Rinehart and Winston. New York.
3. Boyle, T (1997) Design for Multimedia Learning, Prentice Hall, London.
4. Caincross, S and Mannion, M (1999) How multimedia functions in engineering education, IEE Engineering Science and Education Journal, 8, 3, 100-107.
5. Caincross, S and Smith, S (1999) Integrating interactive multimedia into the curriculum. In Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Technology and Education, Edinburgh, March.
6. Clark, R C (1995) Authorware, multimedia, and instructional methods, Macromedia Authorware Version 3: Taking the Plunge, Macromedia Inc., San Francisco CA, pp. 3-28.
7. CSUP (1992) Teaching and Learning in an Expanding Higher Education System : A Report of a Working Party of the Committee of Scottish University Principals, SCFC, Edinburgh.
8. Davidson, K and Goldfinch, J (1998) How to Add VALUE. In Mogey, N (ed.) Evaluation Studies, Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.
9. Davies, P and Brailsford, T (1994) Guidelines for Multimedia Courseware Developers in Higher Education Volume 1: Delivery, Production and Provision, UCoSDA, University of Nottingham.
10. Dearing, R (1997) Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, HMSO, London.
11. Draper, S (1996) Observing, measuring, or evaluating courseware: a conceptual introduction. In Stoner, G (ed.) Implementing Learning Technology, Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative, Edinburgh.
12. Draper, S (1997) Prospects for summative evaluation, Association of Learning Technology Journal, 5, 1, 33-39.
13. Entwistle, N, Thomson, S and Tait, H (1992) Guidelines for Promoting Effective Learning in Higher Education, Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
14. Faraday, P and Sutcliffe, A G (1997) Designing effective multimedia presentations, Proceedings of CHI’97, Atlanta, April.
15. Finklestein, D and Dryden, L (1998) Cultural studies in cyberspace: teaching with new technology, Asynchronous Learning Networks Magazine, 2, 2. Available online: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/magazine/ maga_v2_i2.htm (accessed 10 February 2000).
16. Fisher, S (1994), Multimedia Authoring: Building and Developing Documents, AP Professional, Cambridge, MA.
17. Ford, N (1995) Levels and types of mediation in instructional systems: an individual differences approach, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 241-259.
18. Ford, N and Ford, R (1992) Learning in an ’ideal’ computer-based learning environment, British Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 3, 195-211.
19. Fowler, C J H and Mayes, J T (2000) Learning relationships from theory to design. Association of Learning Technology Journal, 7, 3, 6-16.
20. Gunn, C (1997) CAL evaluation: future directions, Association of Learning Technology Journal, 5, 1, 40-47.
21. Hutchings, G A, Hall, W and Colbourn, C J (1993) Patterns of students’ interaction with a hypermedia system, Interacting With Computers, 5, 3, 295-313.
22. Kommers, P A M, Grabinger, S and Dunlap, J C (1996) Hypermedia Learning Environments:Instructional Design and Integration, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
23. Liu, M (1994) The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment, Computers in Human Behaviour, 10, 4, 419-434.
24. Mayes, J T (1995) Learning technology and Groundhog Day. In Strang, W, Simpson, V and Slater, D (eds) Hypermedia at Work: Practice and Theory in Education, University of Kent Press, Canterbury.
25. Mayes, J T (1993) Commentary: impact of cognitive theory on the practice of courseware authoring, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9, 222-228.
26. Mayes, J T, Kibby, M R and Anderson, A (1990) Signposts for conceptual orientation: some requirements for learning from hypertext. In McAleese, R and Green, A (eds) Hypertext: State Of The Art, Intellect Books, Bristol.
27. McAteer, E and Shaw, R (1995) The Design of Multimedia Learning Programs, EMASHE Group, University of Glasgow.
28. McKendree, J, Reader, W and Hammond, N (1995) The ’homeopathic fallacy’ In ’Learning From Hypertext’, Interactions, 2, 3, 74-82.
29. Milne, J and Heath, S (1997), Evaluation Handbook For Successful CAL Courseware Development, MERTaL Publications, University of Aberdeen.
30. Nwana, H S (1990) Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview, Artifical Intelligence Review, 4, 252-277.
31. Pang, K W & Edmonds, E A (1999), Modelling the Learning in a World Wide Web Guided Discovery Hypertext Learning Environment in Interaction, in M A Sasse & C Johnson (eds.), INTERACT 99: Proceedings of Seventh IFIP Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Edinburgh, UK, pp 597-604.
32. Piaget, J (1972) The Psychology of Intelligence, Littlefield Adams, NJ.
33. Prosser, M & Trigwell, K (1999), Understanding Learning & Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.
34. Riding, R and Cheema, I (1991) Cognitive styles - an overview and integration, Education Psychology 11, 3 and 4, 193-215.
35. Riding, R and Douglas, G (1993) The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning environment, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 297-307.
36. Riding, R and Sadler-Smith, E (1992) Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance, Educational Studies, 18, 3, 323-340.
37. Rogers, Y and Scaife, M (1997) How can interactive multimedia facilitate learning? In Proceedings of First International Workshop on Intelligence and Multimodalities in Multimedia, The Live Oak Press, Palo Alto, pp. 123-142.
38. Rumelhart, D E and Norman, D A (1981) Analogical processes in learning. In Anderson, J R (ed.) Cognitive Skills and Their Acquistion, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
39. Smith, A (1998) Learning technologies and the issues for management education, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 22, 2, 201-210.
40. Sutcliffe, A (1995) Human-Computer Interface Design, 2nd edn, MacMillan Press Ltd, Basingstoke.
41. Sutcliffe, A and Faraday, P (1994) Systematic design for task related interfaces, Information and Software Technology, 36, 4, 225-234.
42. Vetere, F & Howard, S (1999), Redundancy Effects in Instructional Multimedia Systems, in M A Sasse & C Johnson (eds.), INTERACT 99: Proceedings of Seventh IFIP Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Edinburgh, UK, pp 589-596.
43. Vossen, P, Maguire, M and Heim, J (1997) Design Guide for Multimedia, EC Telematics Applications Project IE 2016 Report.
44. Vygotsky, L S (1962) Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Vygotsky, L S (1978) Mind In Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Wenger, E (1987) Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.
47. Witkin, H A, Moore, C A, Goodenough, D R and Cox, P W (1977) Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications, Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.