Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 724-733

  Moreno, Roxana ^a,b   Mayer, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034347494     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.724     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allington, R. L., & Weber, R. (1993). Questioning questions in teaching and learning from texts. In B. K. Britton & A. Woodward (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice (pp. 47-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anand, P., & Ross, S. M. (1987). Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize math learning materials for elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 72-79.
3. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L., Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-291). White Plains, NY: Longman.
4. Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Note-taking and passage style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 242-250.
5. Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 628-638.
6. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.
7. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 11, 268-294.
8. d'Ailly, H. H., Simpson, J., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1997). Where should "you" go in a math compare problem? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 562-567.
9. Davis-Dorsey, J., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1991). The role of rewording and context personalization in the solving of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 61-68.
10. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M. C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 109-118.
12. Freedle, R., & Hale, G. (1979). Acquisition of new comprehension schemata for expository prose by transfer of a narrative schema. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 121-135). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Graesser, A. C., Golding, J. M., & Long, D. L. (1998). Narrative representation and comprehension. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 171-205). White Plains, NY: Longman.
15. Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414-434.
16. Herndon, J. N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 10, 11-12.
17. Hoban, C. F., & van Ormer, E. (1970). The literature of the cinema. New York: Arno.
18. Lester, J. C., Stone, B. A., & Stelling, G. (1999). Lifelike pedagogical agents for mixed-initiative problem solving in constructivist learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 9, 1-44.
19. Macromedia. (1995). Director 4.0.4 [Computer program]. San Francisco: Author.
20. Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19, 30-42.
21. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
22. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
23. Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47-62). New York: Macmillan.
24. Mueller, J. H., Bailis, K. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979). Depth of processing and anxiety in facial recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 23, 511-515.
25. Pea, R. D. (1993). Learning scientific concepts through material and social activities: Conversational analysis meets conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 28, 265-277.
26. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Reeder, G. D., McCormick, C. B., & Esselman, E. D. (1987). Self-referent processing and recall of prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 243-248.
28. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Renninger, K. A., Midi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Reynolds, C. (1998). As we may communicate. SIGCHI Bulletin, 30, 40-44.
31. Rickards, J. P., & McCormick, C. B. (1988). Effect of interspersed conceptual prequestions on note-taking in listening comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 592-594.
32. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
33. Ross, S. M. (1983). Increasing the meaningfulness of quantitative material by adapting context to student background. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 519-529.
34. Ross, S. M., & Anand, P. (1987). A computer-based strategy for personalizing verbal problems in teaching mathematics. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 35, 151-162.
35. Ross, S. M., McCormick, D., & Krisak, N. (1986). Adapting the thematic context of mathematical problems to student interests: Individual versus group-based strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 245-252.
36. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1970). The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of Educational Research, 40, 325-336.
37. Spiro, R. (1977). Remembering information from text: The state of schema approach. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 137-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Spiro, R. J., & Taylor, B. M. (1987). On investigating children's transition from narrative to expository discourse: The multidimensional nature of psychological text classification. In R. J. Tierney, P. L. Anders, & J. N. Mitchell (Eds.), Understanding readers' understanding: Theory and practice (pp. 77-93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371-394.
40. Turco, R. M. (1996). Self-referencing, quality of argument, and persuasion. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 15, 258-276.