Learning to teach struggling (and non-struggling) elementary school readers: An analysis of preservice teachers’ knowledges

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 83-102

  Duffy, Ann M ^a   Atkinson, Terry S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342568161     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388070109558359     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allington, R. L. (1997). Why does literacy research so often ignore what really matters? In C. K. Kinzer, K. A. Hinchman, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Inquiries in literacy theory and practice (46th yearbook of the National Reading Conference) (pp. 1-12). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
2. Allington, R.L. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.
3. Allington, R„ & McGill-Franzen, A. (1989). School response to reading failure: Instruction for Chapter I and special education students in grades two, four, and eight. Elementary School Journal, 89,529-542.
4. Alvermann, D. E. (1990). Reading teacher education. In W. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 687-704). New York: Macmillan.
5. Anders, P.L., Hoffman, J.V., & Duffy, G.G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3) (pp. 719-742). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Baumann, J.F., Hoffman, J.V., Duffy-Hester, A.M., & Moon, J.S. (2000). The First R yesterday and today: U.S. elementary reading instruction practices reported by teachers and administrators. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 338-377.
7. Bear, D. R., Invemizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (1996). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
8. Broaddus, K., & Bloodgood, J. W. (1997, December). “We already knew how to teach reading": School change to support struggling readers. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
9. Broaddus, K., & Bloodgood, J.W. (1999). “We’re supposed to already know how to teach reading:” Teacher change to support struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34,426-451.
10. Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17 (2), 5-12.
11. nd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference) (pp. 297-304). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
12. Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (1994). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write. New York: HarperCollins.
13. Delpit, L. D. (1992). Acquisition of literacy discourse: Bowing before the master? Theory into practice, 31, 296-302.
14. Duffy, A. (1997a, December). Outstanding elementary school preservice teachers’ perceptions of, learnings about, and work with struggling readers. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
15. Duffy, G. G. (1997b). Powerful models or powerful teachers? An argument for teacher-as-entrepreneur. In S. A. Stahl & D. A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading (pp. 351-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Duffy, G.G. (1998). Teaching and the balancing of round stones. Phi Delta Kappan, 79 (10), 777-780.
17. nd ed.) (pp. 410-441). New York: Simon & Schuster.
18. Fogg, M., & Morris, D. (1997, December). The effects of a supervised tutoring experience on first grade teachers’ beliefs and practices. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
19. Fosnot, C.T. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
21. Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J.W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMMS video study. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 3-20.
22. Hoffman, J.V., Au, K.H., Harrison, C., Paris, S.G., Pearson, P. D., Santa, C. M., Silver, S. H., & Valencia, S. (1999). High-stakes assessments in reading: Consequences, concerns, and common sense. In S. J. Barrentine (Ed.), Reading assessment: Principles and practices for elementary teachers (pp. 247-260). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. th Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
24. Kurtts, S. & Levin, B. (2000). Using peer coaching with preservice teachers to develop reflective practice and peer support. Journal of Research in Education, 11, 297-310.
25. Johnston, F. R., Invemizzi, M., & Juel, C. (1998). Book buddies: Guidelines for volunteer tutors of emergent and early readers. New York: Guilford.
26. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62 (2), 129-169.
27. Leslie, L. & Caldwell, J. (1995). Qualitative Reading Inventory—II. New York: HarperCollins.
28. Mallette, M. H., Kile, R. S., Smith, M. M., McKinney, M., & Readence, J. E. (2000). Constructing meaning about literacy difficulties: Preservice teachers beginning to think about pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16,593-612.
29. Morris, D., Ervin, C., & Conrad, K. (1996). A case study of middle school reading disability. The Reading Teacher, 49, 368-377.
30. Moss, B. J. (1994). Cultural differences as resources: Ways of understanding in the classroom. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Teachers thinking, teachers knowing: Reflections on literacy and language education (pp. 76-87). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
31. O’ Sullivan, P.J., Ysseldyke, J.E., Christenson, S.L., & Thurlow, M.L. (1990). Mildly handicapped elementary students’ opportunity to learn during reading instruction in mainstream and special education settings. Reading Research Quarterly, 25,131-146.
32. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Rhodes, L. K., & Nathenson-Mejia, S. (1992). Anecdotal records: A powerful tool for ongoing literacy assessment. The Reading Teacher, 45, 502-509.
34. th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference) (pp. 47-58). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
35. nd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference) (pp. 325-334). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
36. rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference) (pp. 418-428). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
37. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
38. Shearer, A. P., & Homan, S. P. (1994). Linking reading assessment to instruction: An application worktext for elementary classroom teachers. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
39. Vacca, J. A. L., Vacca, R. T., & Gove, M. K. (1995). Reading and learning to read (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
40. Walmsley, S. A., & Allington, R. L. (1995). Redefining and reforming instructional support programs for at-risk students. In R. L. Allington & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America’s elementary schools (pp. 19-44). New York and Newark, DE: Teachers College Press and International Reading Association.
41. Wolf, S.A., Carey, A.A., & Mieras, E.L. (1996). “What is this ‘literachurch’ stuff anyway?” Preservice teachers’ growth in understanding children’s literary response. Reading Research Quarterly, 31 (2), 130-157.
42. Worthy, J., & Prater, S. (1998). Learning on the job: Preservice teachers’ perceptions of participating in a literacy tutorial program. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 47"’ Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 485-495). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
43. Worthy, J., Prater, S., Patterson, E., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1997, December). Learning on the job: Preservice teachers’ connections between reading intervention and classroom practice. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
44. Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (3), 3-9.