Does looping and clustering in the nucleus regulate gene expression?

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 256-262

  Chambeyron, Séverine ^a   Bickmore, Wendy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abd B; abdominal B; ACH; active chromatin hub; bithorax complex; broad complex, tramtrack bric a brac Pox virus zinc finger; Btb poz; BX C; CCCTC binding factor; cellular memory module; ChIP; chromatin immunoprecipitation; CMM; CTCF; FISH

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; BETA GALACTOSIDASE; BETA GLOBIN; CYSTEINYLTHREONYLCYSTEINYLPHENYLALANINE; DNA; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; LIGASE; UBIQUITIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

CELL CYCLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS INCLUSION BODY; DROSOPHILA; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE REPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REGULATOR GENE; REPORTER GENE; REVIEW; SCALLOP; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; UBIQUITINATION;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; DROSOPHILA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GLOBINS; HUMANS; LOCUS CONTROL REGION; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 2342485824     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.004     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Bulger M., Groudine M. Looping versus linking: toward a model for long-distance gene activation. Genes Dev. 13:1999;2465-2477
2. Carter D., Chakalova L., Osbourne C.S., Dai Y-F., Fraser P. Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo. Nat Genet. 32:2002;623-626 Using a modified RNA FISH method called RNA-TRAP, the authors show that a distal enhancer is held in close physical proximity to an active β-globin gene in vivo. The intervening silent embryonic genes are not found positioned close to the enhancer. This provides direct evidence for regulation by long-range enhancer communication.
3. Dekker J., Rippe K., Dekker M., Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science. 295:2002;1306-1311
4. Tolhuis B., Palstra R.J., Splinter E., Grosveld F., de Laat W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active β-globin locus. Mol Cell. 10:2002;1453-1465 The authors use the 3C technique to demonstrate that distal regulatory elements and active genes of the murine β-globin locus interact in vivo while the intervening DNA loops out. The interaction and looping are not observed in non-expressing tissue. They propose that the interaction between regulatory elements and the looping out of the chromatin domain is crucial to establishing an open chromatin domain and activating transcription.
5. Palstra R.J., Tolhuis B., Splinter E., Nijmeijer R., Grosveld F., de Laat W. The β-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nat Genet. 35:2003;190-194 This paper reports the spatial organisation of the β-globin cluster at different stages of development in erythroid cells. The authors demonstrate that the interaction between regulatory elements is conserved between primitive and definitive erythroid cells. However, there is a developmental switch in the β-globin genes that interact with the regulatory elements that correlates with the switch in their expression. Furthermore, in erythroid progenitor cells that do not yet express the globin genes, the looped conformation of the cluster is already detected. This is evidence that loop formation is necessary to establish a structure permissive for β-globin expression.
6. Mahmoudi T., Katsani K.R., Verrijzer C.P. GAGA can mediate enhancer function in trans by linking two separate DNA molecules. EMBO J. 21:2002;1775-1781 The authors show that GAGA could form a protein link between separate DNA elements. This GAGA-dependent bridge involves oligomerization via its POZ domain. GAGA also acts as an anchor that facilitates gene activation by linking an enhancer to a promoter, even when the enhancer and the promoter are located on separate DNA molecules. The authors propose that GAGA facilitates long-range activation by providing a protein bridge that mediates enhancer-promoter communication.
7. Farrell C.M., West A.G., Felsenfeld G. Conserved CTCF insulator elements flank the mouse and human β-globin loci. Mol Cell Biol. 22:2002;3820-3831
8. Bulger M., Schubeler D., Bender M.A., Hamilton J., Farrell C.M., Hardison R.C., Groudine M. A complex chromatin landscape revealed by patterns of nuclease sensitivity and histone modification within the mouse β-globin locus. Mol Cell Biol. 23:2003;5234-5244
9. de Laat W., Grosveld F. Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub. Chromosome Res. 11:2003;447-459
10. West A.G., Gaszner M., Felsenfeld G. Insulators: many functions, many mechanisms. Genes Dev. 16:2002;271-288
11. Gerasimova T.I., Corces V.G. Chromatin insulators and boundaries: effects on transcription and nuclear organization. Annu Rev Genet. 35:2001;193-208
12. Blanton J., Gaszner M., Schedl P. Protein:protein interactions and the pairing of boundary elements in vivo. Genes Dev. 17:2003;664-675 This paper shows that the scs and scs′ insulators interact with each other in vivo. This interaction is mediated by the Zw5 and BEAF32 proteins associated with each element. Loop formation is confirmed by 3C and illustrates how insulators could subdivide the chromosome into autonomous functional units (loops).
13. Zhao K., Hart C.M., Laemmli U.K. Visualization of chromosomal domains with boundary-element-associated factor BEAF-32. Cell. 81:1995;879-889
14. Gerasimov T.I., Byrd K., Corces V.G. A chromatin insulator determines the nuclear localization of DNA. Mol Cell. 6:2000;1025-1035
15. Golovnin A., Birukova I., Romanova O., Silicheva M., Parshikov A., Savitskaya E., Pirrotta V., Georgiev P. An endogenous Su(Hw) insulator separates the yellow gene from the Achaete-scute complex in Drosophila. Development. 130:2003;3249-3258 This study identifies the first endogenous functional Su(Hw) insulator, which is located between the yellow gene and the Achaete-scute gene complex. This insulator contains two Su(Hw) binding sites that are required for the insulator function. The Su(Hw) and Mod(mdg4) proteins participate in proper regulation of the Achaete-scute gene complex.
16. Byrd K., Corces V.G. Visualization of chromatin domains created by the gypsy insulator of Drosophila. J Cell Biol. 162:2003;565-574 Here, the authors have studied the spatial organisation of the chromosome X region containing the cut locus flanked by two endogenous Su(Hw) binding sites. Using FISH they show that the intervening DNA is arranged in a loop, with the two insulators located at the base. Furthermore, the insertion of an additional gypsy insulator in the centre of the loop results in the formation of two smaller loops. These results suggest that the gypsy insulator modifies nuclear organisation by creating chromatin loops.
17. Ohtsuki S., Levine M. GAGA mediates the enhancer blocking activity of the eve promoter in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 12:1998;3325-3330
18. Hagstrom K., Muller M., Schedl P. A polycomb and GAGA dependent silencer adjoins the Fab-7 boundary in the Drosophila bithorax complex. Genetics. 146:1997;1365-1380
19. Cavalli G., Paro R. The Drosophila Fab-7 chromosomal element conveys epigenetic inheritance during mitosis and meiosis. Cell. 93:1998;505-518
20. Horard B., Tatout C., Poux S., Pirrotta V. Structure of a polycomb response element and in vitro binding of polycomb group complexes containing GAGA factor. Mol Cell Biol. 20:2000;3187-3197
21. Henikoff S., Comai L. Trans-sensing effects: the ups and downs of being together. Cell. 93:1998;329-332
22. Americo J., Whiteley M., Brown J.L., Fujioka M., Jaynes J.B., Kassis J.A. A complex array of DNA-binding protein required for pairing sensitive silencing by a polycomb group response element from the Drosophila engrailed gene. Genetics. 160:2002;1561-1571
23. Sigrist C.J., Pirrotta V. Chromatin insulator elements block the silencing of a target gene by the Drosophila polycomb response element (PRE) but allow trans interactions between PREs on different chromosomes. Genetics. 147:1997;209-221
24. Gemkow M.J., Verveer P.J., Arndt-Jovin D.J. Homologous association of the Bithorax-complex during embryogenesis: consequences for transvection in Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 125:1998;4541-4552
25. Bantignies F., Grimaud C., Lavrov S., Gabut M., Cavalli G. Inheritance of polycomb-dependent chromosomal interactions in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 17:2003;2406-2420 Repression of the scalloped gene by a Fab-7 mini-white transgene integration 18kb away is shown to be dependent on the endogenous Fab-7 element and/or of the presence of another Fab-7 element elsewhere in the genome. FISH analysis shows that this repression is mediated by a physical co-localisation of the endogenous Fab-7 and the transgene in embryonic nuclei. This interaction depends strongly on the chromatin components of the PcG, on DNA sequence homology and also on the nuclear compartmentalisation of chromosomal domains.
26. Buchenau P., Hodgson J., Strutt H., Arndt-Jovin D.J. The distribution of polycomb-group proteins during cell division and development in Drosophila embryos: impact on models for silencing. J Cell Biol. 141:1998;469-481
27. Messmer S., Franke A., Paro R. Analysis of the functional role of the polycomb chromo domain in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 6:1992;1241-1254
28. Saurin A.J., Shiels C., Williamson J., Satijn D.P., Otte A.P., Sheer D., Freemont P.S. The human polycomb group complex associates with pericentromeric heterochromatin to form a novel nuclear domain. J Cell Biol. 142:1998;887-898
29. Voncken J.W., Schweizer D., Aagaard L., Sattler L., Jantsch M.F., van Lohuizen M. Chromatin-association of the polycomb group protein BMI1 is cell-cycle-regulated and correlates with its phosphorylation status. J Cell Sci. 112:1999;4627-4639
30. The Nuclear Protein Database on the World Wide Web. URL: http://npd.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/.
31. Best J.L., Ganiatsas S., Agarwal S., Changou A., Salomoni P., Shirihai O., Meluh P.B., Pandolfi P.P., Zon L.I. SUMO-1 protease-1 regulates gene transcription through PML. Mol Cell. 10:2002;843-855
32. Zhong S., Muller S., Ronchetti S., Freemont P.S., Dejean A., Pandolfi P.P. Role of SUMO-1-modified PML in nuclear body formation. Blood. 95:2000;2748-2752
33. Kagey M.H., Melhuish T.A., Wotton D. The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell. 113:2003;127-137 The authors have shown that the transcriptional corepressor CtBP, containing a single sumoylation motif, is modified by SUMO-1 or SUMO-3. Furthermore, they show that sumoylated CtBP is associated with Pc2, one of the mammalian PcG proteins, and raise the possibility that Pc2 enhances CtBP sumoylisation. Indeed Pc2 recruits both CtBP and Ubc9 into PcG bodies. By bringing together the substrate and the enzyme, Pc2 stimulated the transfer of SUMO to CtBP and acts as the SUMO E3. The authors suggest that the PcG bodies might be sumoylation centres.
34. Krek W. BTB proteins as henchmen of Cul3-based ubiquitin ligases. Nat Cell Biol. 5:2003;950-951
35. Rippe K. Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer. Trends Biochem Sci. 26:2001;733-740
36. Chubb J.R., Bickmore W.A. Considering nuclear compartmentalization in the light of nuclear dynamics. Cell. 112:2003;403-406
37. Yusufzai T.M., Tagami H., Nakatani Y., Felsenfeld G. CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species. Mol Cell. 13:2004;291-298
38. Wang J., Shiels C., Sasieni P., Wu P.J., Islam S.A., Freemont P.S., Sheer D. Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies associate with transcriptionally active genomic regions. J Cell Biol. 164:2004;515-526