Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 2433-2439

  Boden, Catherine ^a   Pascual, John ^a   Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Aibara, Makoto ^a,b   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

ALGORITHMS; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 23244461941     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1108     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:165-169.
2. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:268-272.
3. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA standard, SITA fast, and the Humphrey full threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:125-129.
4. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:143-146.
5. Bengtsson B. Reliability of computerized perimetric threshold tests as assessed by reliability indices and threshold reproducibility in patients with suspect and manifest glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:519-522.
6. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1136-1141.
7. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1052-1058.
8. Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Mohsin M. Comparison of the Humphrey Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:20-27.
9. Shirato S, Inoue R, Fukushima K, Suzuki Y. Clinical evaluation of SITA: a new family of perimetric testing strategies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:29-34.
10. Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full-threshold testing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42:528-537.
11. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999.
12. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:368-375.
13. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full-Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43: 2654-2659.
14. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:314-322.
15. Bayer AU, Erb C. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1009-1017.
16. Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M, Higginbotham EJ. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:328-333.
17. lester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:288-294.
18. Maddess T, Severt WL. Testing for glaucoma with the frequency-doubling illusion in the whole, macular and eccentric visual fields. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999;27:194-196.
19. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Lee BL, Perez JS, Weinreb RN. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry (FDT) in glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and normal eyes. In: Kriglestein GK, ed. Glaucoma Update VI. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999:133-144.
20. Soliman MA, de Jong LA, Ismaeil AA, van den Berg TJ, de Smet MD. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:444-454.
21. Johnson CA, Demirel S. The role of spatial and temporal factors in frequency-doubling perimetry. Perimetry Update. 1997:13-19.
22. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
23. Trible JR, Schultz RO, Robinson JC, Rothe TL. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:740-745.
24. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, Mensah J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:830-836.
25. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, Welsh AH, James AC. Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res. 1999;39:4258-4273.
26. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, Girkin C, Weinreb RN. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1783-1789.
27. Kelly D. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 1966;56:446-448.
28. Maddess T, Bedford S, James A, Rose K. A multiple-frequency, multiple-region pattern electroretinogram investigation of non-linear retinal signals. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25:S94-S97.
29. Bedford S, Maddess T, Rose K, James A. Correlations be observability of the spatial frequency doubled illusion and multi-region pattern electroretinogram. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25:S91-S93.
30. Johnson CA. Psychophysical measurement of glaucomatous damage. Sum Ophthalmol. 2001;45(suppl 3):S313-S318; discussion S322-S324.
31. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson SR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993.
32. McKenzie DP, Mackinnon AJ, Peladeau N, et al. Comparing correlated KS by resampling: is one level of agreement significantly different from another? J Psychiatr Res. 1996;30:483-492.
33. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Lee BL, Perez JS, Weinreb RN. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry (FDT) in glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and normal eyes. In: Kriglestein GK, ed. Glaucoma Up-date VL Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999:133-144.
34. Kalaboukhova L, Lindblom B. Frequency doubling technology and high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81:247-252.
35. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Patella VM. Glaucoma follow-up when converting from long to short perimetric threshold tests. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:489-493.
36. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 1. Study design and methods and baseline characteristics of study patients. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:299-325.