Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 143-146

  Bengtsson, Boel ^a   Heijl, Anders ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical testing; Glaucoma; Probability maps; Threshold perimetry; Visual field strategies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

EID: 0032908386     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770205.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bengtsson B & Heijl A (1998a): SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76: 431-437.
2. Bengtsson B & Heijl A (1998b): Evaluation of a new threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76: 268-272.
3. Bengtsson B & Heijl A (1999): Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetric strategies. SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77: 125-129.
4. Bengtsson B, Heijl A & Olsson J (1998): Evaluation of a new threshold strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76: 165-169.
5. Bengtsson B, Lindgren A, Heijl A & Lindgren G (1997b): Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75: 184-188.
6. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A & Rootzén H (1997a): A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75: 368-375.
7. Cunliffe IA, Pacey IE, Wild JM, Sedgewick G & O'Neill (1998): The validity and reproducibility of the SITA Standard and SITA Fast threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Abstract, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci vol 39, ARVO suppl, s: 26.
8. Haley MJ (1986): The Field Analyzer primer. Allergan Humphrey, San Leandro, CA.
9. Heijl A (1985): The Humphrey Field Analyzer, construction and concepts. In Heijl & Greve (eds.) Documenta Ophthalmol Proc series 42: 77-84. Proceedings of the 6th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1984. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
10. Heijl A (1985): The Humphrey Field Analyzer, construction and concepts. In Heijl & Greve (eds.) Documenta Ophthalmol Proc series 42: 77-84. Proceedings of the 6th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1984. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
11. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987a): Normal variability of static threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 105: 1544-1549.
12. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987b): A package for statistical analysis of computerized visual fields. In Greve & Heijl (ed.) Documenta Ophthalmol Proc series 49: 153-168. Proceedings of the 7th International Perimetic Society Meeting 1986, Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
13. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987b): A package for statistical analysis of computerized visual fields. In Greve & Heijl (ed.) Documenta Ophthalmol Proc series 49: 153-168. Proceedings of the 7th International Perimetic Society Meeting 1986, Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
14. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J & Åsman P (1989): Visual field interpretation with empirical probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 107: 204-208.
15. Statpac user's guide (1989). Allergan Humphrey, San Leandro, California.
16. Tsuji A, Inazumi K, Yamamoto T & Kitazawa Y (1998): Evaluation of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm, a new thresholding algorithm, of the Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects. Nippon Ganka Gakki Zasshi 102: 359-364.