SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: A comparison with full threshold testing

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 528-537

  Wall, M ^a   Punke, S G ^a   Stickney, T L ^a   Brito, C F ^a   Withrow, K R ^a   Kardon, R H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FATIGUE; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; VISION TEST;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0035145189     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA
2. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma
3. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma
4. An improved method to estimate frequency of false positive answers in computerized perimetry
5. Maximum likelihood estimation of the frequency of false positive and false negative answers from the up-and-down staircases of computerized threshold perimetry
6. Improved threshold estimates using full staircase data
7. New threshold algorithms in threshold automated perimetry
8. Clinical evaluation of SITA: A new family of perimetric testing strategies
9. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC
10. Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma
11. Cunliffe IA. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma
12. Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects
13. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies
14. Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices
15. Response variability in the visual field: Comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes
16. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: Full threshold, FASTPAC, and S1TA. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm
17. Static perimetry: Accuracy and fluctuations
18. Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Factors influencing short-term fluctuation
19. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields
20. Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients
21. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects
22. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma
23. Long-term follow-up of baseline learning and fatigue effects in the automated perimetry of glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients
24. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies