Varieties of intellectual talent

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 93-119

  Stanley, Julian C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031511720     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00783.x     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. ACHTER, J. A., BENBOW, C. P., & LUBINSKI, D. (IN PRESS). Multipotentiality among the gifted: Is it a pervasive problem? Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 2-12.
2. ACHTER, J. A., LUBINSKI, D., & BENBOW, C. P. (1996). Multipotentiality among intellectually gifted: "It never was there and already it's vanishing." Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 65-76.
3. ALBERT, R. S. (1994). The achievement of eminence: A longitudinal study of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 282-315). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. ARNOLD, K. D. (1995). Lines of promise: High school ualedictorians over time. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. BAYLEY, N., AND ODEN, M. H. (1955). The maintenance of intellectual ability in gifted adults. Journal of Gerontology, 10, 91-107.
6. BENBOW, C. P. (1986). SMPY's model for teaching mathematically precocious students. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 2-25). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
7. BENBOW, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 169-232.
8. BENBOW, C. P. (1990). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Further thoughts. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 13, 196-198.
9. BENBOW, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How "equity" can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249-292.
10. BINET, A., & SIMON, TH. (1905). Methodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. Année Psychologique, 11, 191-244.
11. BLOOM, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
12. BLOOM, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballentine.
13. BOCK, G. R., & ACKRILL, K. (Eds.). (1993). The origins and development of high ability. Proceedings of a symposium held at the Ciba Foundation in London on 25 January 1993. New York: Wiley.
14. BRODY, L. E., & STANLEY, J. C. (1991). Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102-132). New York: Teachers College Press.
15. BRODY, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. CARROLL, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. CATTELL, J. M. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15, 373-380.
18. CHARLTON, J. C., MAROLF, D. M., STANLEY, J. C., & NG, L. (1994). Follow-up insights on rapid educational acceleration. Roeper Review, 17, 123-130.
19. CLARIZIO, H. F., & MEHRENS, W. A. (1985). Psychometric limitations of Guilford's structure-of-intellect model for identification and programming of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 113-120.
20. COLANGELO, N., ASSOULINE, S. G., COLE, V., CUTRONA, C., & MAXEY, J. E. (1996). Exceptional academic performance: Perfect scores on the PLAN. Gifted Child Quarterly. 40, 102-110.
21. COX, C. M. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Genetic Studies of Genius, Vol. II. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. CRONBACH, L. J. (1996). Acceleration among German males: Correlates in midlife and after. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 179-191). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. DEARY, I. A., & PAGLIARI, C. (1991). The strength of g at different levels: Have Detterman and Daniel rediscovered Spearman's "Law of diminishing returns"? Intelligence, 15, 247-250.
24. DETTERMAN, D. K. (1991). Reply to Deary and Pagliari: Is g intelligence or stupidity? Intelligence, 15, 251-255.
25. DETTERMAN, D. K., & DANIEL, M. H. (1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low-IQ groups. Intelligence, 13, 349-359.
26. ERICSSON, K. A., KRAMPE, R. T., & HEIZMANN, S. (1993). Can we create gifted people? In G.R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 222-249). New York: Wiley.
27. ERICSSON, K. A., KRAMPE, R. T., & TESCH-ROMER, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
28. FELDHUSEN, J. F., & JARWAN, F. A. (1993). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 233-251). New York: Pergamon.
29. FRIEDMAN, H. S., TUCKER, J. S., SCHWARTZ, J. E., TOMLINSON-KEASEY, C., MARTIN, L. R., WINGARD, D. L., & CRIQUI, M. H. (1995). Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of longevity: The aging and death of the "Termites." American Psychologist, 50, 69-78.
30. GALTON, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan.
31. GALLAGHER, J. J. (1993). Current status of gifted education in the United States. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 755-770). New York: Pergamon.
32. GARDNER, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
33. GARDNER, H. (1993a). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.
34. GARDNER, H. (1993b). The relationship between early giftedness and later achievement. In G. R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 175-186). New York: Wiley.
35. GODDARD, H. H. (1910a). A measuring scale for intelligence. The Training School, 6, 146-155.
36. GODDARD, H. H. (1910b). Four hundred feebleminded children classified by the Binet method. Pedagogical Seminary, 17, 387-397.
37. GODDARD, H. H. (1911). Two thousand normal children measured by the Binet measuring scale of intelligence. Pedagogical Seminary, 18, 232-259.
38. GOERTZEL, V., & GOERTZEL, M. C. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston: Little, Brown.
39. GOERTZEL, M. G., GOERTZEL, V., & GOERTZEL, T. F. (1978). Three hundred eminent personalities: A psychological analysis of the famous. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40. GORDON, R. A. (in press). Everyday life as an intelligence test: Effects of intelligence and intelligence context. Intelligence.
41. GOTTFREDSON, L. S. (1996). What do we know about intelligence? American Scholar, 65 (1), 15-30.
42. GOTTFREDSON, L. S. (in press). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence.
43. GUSTAFSSON, J.-E., & BALKE, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 407-434.
44. HERRNSTEIN, R. J., & MURRAY, C. A. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
45. HOLAHAN, C. K., " SEARS, R. R. (1995). The gifted group in later maturity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46. HOLLINGWORTH, H. L. (1943). Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A biography. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
47. HOLLINGWORTH, L. S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
48. HOLLINGWORTH, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Co.
49. HORN, J. L., & KNAPP, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford's structure-of-intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33-43.
50. HUNT, E. (1995). The role of intelligence in modern society. American Scientist, 83, 356-368.
51. JENSEN, A. R., & Weng, L.-J. (1994). What is good g? Intelligence, 18, 231-258.
52. KEATING, D. P. (Ed.). (1976). Intellectual talent: Research and development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53. KEATING, D. P., & STANLEY, J. C. (1972). Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 1, 3-7.
54. KERR, B. (1992). A twenty-year follow-up of gifted women. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent Development, Vol. 2. Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 240-247). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
55. LOHMAN, D. F. (1993). Teaching and testing to develop fluid abilities. Educational Researcher, 22, 12-23.
56. LUBINSKI, D. (Ed.). (1996). Applied individual differences research: Its quantitative methods and its policy relevance. Special issue of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2 (2, June), pp. 187-392.
57. LYKKEN, D. T. (1982). Research with twins: The concept of emergenesis. Psychophysiology, 19, 361-373.
58. LYKKEN, D. T., MCGUE, M., TELLEGEN, A., & BOUCHARD, Jr., T. J. (1992). Emergenesis: Genetic traits that may not run in families. American Psychologist, 47, 1565-1577.
59. LYNCH, S. J. (1992). Fast-paced high school science for the academically talented: A six-year perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 147-154.
60. McNEMAR, Q. (1964). Lost: Our intelligence? Why? American Psychologist, 18, 871-882.
61. MONTOUR, K. M. (1977). William James Sidis, the broken twig. American Psychologist, 32, 265-279.
62. MONTOUR, K. M. (1978). Merrill Kenneth Wolf: A Bachelor's degree at 14. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.). Educational programs and intellectual prodigies (pp. 57-58). Baltimore, MD: Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth, Johns Hopkins University.
63. NEISSER, U.; BOODOO, G.; BOUCHARD, Jr., T. J.; BOYKIN, A. W.; BRODY, N.; CECI, S. J.; HALPERN, D. F.; LOEHLIN, J. C.; PERLOFF, R.; STERNBERG, R. J.; & URBINA, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
64. NEVO, B. (1994). Definitions, ideologies, and hypotheses in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 184-186.
65. ODEN, M. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40-year follow-up of the Terman gifted group. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 77 (1st half), 3-93.
66. PASSOW, A. H. (1993). National/state policies regarding education of the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 29-46). New York: Pergamon.
67. PETERSON, I. (1993). Wizard of Oz: Bringing drama to virtual reality. Science News, 142(Nos. 25 & 26, Dec. 19 & 26), 440-141.
68. PHARES, T. K. (1990). Seeking - and finding - science talent: A 50-year history of the Westinghouse Science Talent Search. Pittsburgh, PA: Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
69. PLOMIN, R. (1997). Genetics and intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.) (pp. 67-74). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
70. PLOMIN, R. & McCLEARN, G. E. (1993). Nature, nurture, and psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
71. RENZULLI, J. S. (Ed.). (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Center.
72. RICE, J. M. (1897a). The futility of the spelling grind: I. Forum, 23, 163-172.
73. RICE, J. M. (1897b). The futility of the spelling grind: II. Forum, 23, 409-419.
74. ROBINSON, H. B. (1983). A case for radical acceleration: Programs of the Johns Hopkins University and the University of Washington. In C. P. Benbow and J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 139-159). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
75. ROBINSON, N. M. (1993). Identifying and nurturing gifted, very young children. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 507-524). New York: Pergamon.
76. ROE, A. (1952). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.
77. ROWE, D. C. (1994). The limits of family influence: Genes, experience, and behavior. New York: Guilford.
78. ROWE, P. M. (1995). Smithsonian lecture series is a smashing success. APS (American Psychological Society) Observer, 8, 1 & 20-22.
79. SCARR, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63, 1-19.
80. SCARR, S. (1996). How people make their own environment: Implications for parents and policy makers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 204-228.
81. SIMONTON, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.
82. SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE (1995). The math whiz kids have fulfilled their promise - in a variety of ways. 26 (April, No. 1), 34.
83. SNOW, C. P. (1966). Variety of men. New York: Scribner's.
84. SNOW, C. P. (1971). Review of The Born-Einstein letters. American Association for the Advancement of Science Bulletin, 16, 3 & 8.
85. SNOW, R. E., & SWANSON J. (1992). Instructional psychology: Aptitude, adaptation, and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 583-626.
86. SOUTHERN, W. T., JONES, E. D., & STANLEY, J. C. (1993). Acceleration and enrichment: The context and development of program options. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 387-409). New York: Pergamon.
87. SPEARMAN, C. (1904). "General intelligence" objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293.
88. SPRANGER, E. (1928). Types of men: The psychology and ethics of personality. (Translation of Lebensformen, 1927). Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
89. SPRANGER, E. (1928). Types of men: The psychology and ethics of personality. (Translation of Lebensformen, 1927). Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
90. STANLEY, J. C. (1953). Why Wechsler-Bellevue full-scale IQs are more variable than averages of verbal and performance IQs. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17, 419-420.
91. STANLEY, J. C. (1954). Identification of superior learners in grades ten to fourteen. Supplemental Educational Monograph No. 81, University of Chicago Press, pp. 31-34.
92. STANLEY, J. C. (1973). Accelerating the educational progress of intellectually gifted youths. Educational Psychologist, 10, 133-146.
93. STANLEY, J. C. (1976). Special fast-mathematics classes taught by college professors to fourth-through twelfth-graders. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 132-159). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
94. STANLEY, J. C. (1977). Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective (pp. 75-112). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
95. STANLEY, J. C. (1978). SMPY's DT-PI Model: Diagnostic testing followed by prescriptive instruction. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 4 (10), 7-8.
96. STANLEY, J. C. (1990). Leta Hollingworth's contributions to above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 12, 166-171.
97. STANLEY, J. C. (1991). A better model for residential high schools for talented youths. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 471-473.
98. STANLEY, J. C. (1993). Boys and girls who reason well mathematically. In G. R. Bock and K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 119-138). New York: Wiley.
99. STANLEY, J. C. (1994). Gender differences for able elementary school students on above-grade-level ability and achievement tests. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent Development, Vol. 2. Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 141-148). Dayton, Ohio: Ohio Psychology Press.
100. STANLEY, J. C. (1996). In the beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY). In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.). Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225-235). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
101. STANLEY, J. C, & BENBOW, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason extremely well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361-387). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
102. STANLEY, J. C.; BENBOW, C. P.; BRODY, L. E.; DAUBER, S. L.; & LUPKOWSKI, A. E. (1992). Gender differences on eighty-six nationally standardized aptitude and achievement tests. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development, Vol. 1. Proceedings from the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 42-65). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
103. STANLEY, J. C., KEATING, D. P., & FOX, L. H. (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
104. STANLEY, J. C., & STANLEY, B. S. K. (1986). High-school biology, chemistry, or physics learned well in three weeks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 237-250.
105. STANLEY, J. C., STUMPF, H., & COHN, S. J. (In press). Ipsative evaluative attitudes versus cognitive abilities and vocational interests of bright male versus female seventh-graders. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, and D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent Development, Vol. 3. Proceedings from the 1995 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Dayton, Ohio: Ohio Psychology Press.
106. STERN, W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore: Warwick & York.
107. STERNBERG, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
108. STERNBERG, R. J., FERRARI, & CLINKENBEARD, P. (1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 129-137.
109. STERNBERG, R. J., & ZHANG, L. (1995). What do we mean by giftedness? A pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 88-94.
110. STROZIER, C. B., & OFFER, D. (1985). The leader: Psychohistorical essays. New York: Plenum Press.
111. STUMPF, H., & STANLEY, J. C. (1996). Gender-related differences on the College Board's Advanced Placement and Achievement Tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 353-364.
112. STUMPF, H., & STANLEY, J. C. (in press). Gender-related differences in enrollment in and scores on the Advanced Placement Computer Science examinations. College Board Review.
113. TANNENBAUM, A. J. (1993). History of giftedness and "gifted education" in world perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 3-27). New York: Pergamon.
114. TERMAN, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
115. TORRANCE, E. P. (1977). Creatively gifted and disadvantaged gifted. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative (pp. 173-196). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
116. TREFFINGER, D. J. (1986). Giftedness as potential for creativity productivity: Transcending the scores. Roeper Review, 8(3), 150-154.
117. VANTASSEL-BASKA, J. (1993). Theory and research on curriculum development for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 365-386). New York: Pergamon.
118. VANTASSEL-BASKA, J. (1994a). The National Curriculum Development Projects for High-Ability Learners: Key issues and findings. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development, Vol. 2. Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 19-38). Dayton, Ohio: Ohio Psychology Press.
119. VANTASSEL-BASKA, J. (1994b). Needed research about the gifted and talented. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development, Vol. 2. Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp.137-140). Dayton, Ohio: Ohio Psychology Press.
120. WALLACE, A. (1986). The prodigy: A biography of William James Sidis, America's greatest child prodigy. New York: Dutton.
121. WECHSLER, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
122. WIENER, N. (1953). Ex-prodigy: My childhood and youth. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
123. WINNER, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.
124. WOODCOCK, R. W. (April 1995). Conceptualizations of intelligence and their implications for education. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in San Francisco, California.
125. ZUCKERMAN, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.