Research into the assessment of school-age language learners

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 25, Issue , 2005, Pages 243-263

  McKay, Penny ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644447111     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190505000139     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Brindley, G. (1998b). Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning progammes: A review of the issues. Language Testing, 15, 45-85.
2. Butler, F. A., & Stevens, R. (2001). Standardised assessment of the content knowledge of English language learners K-12: Current trends and old dilemmas. Language Testing, 18(4), 409-427.
3. Butler, F. A., Lord, C., Stevens, R., Borrego, M., & Bailey, A. L. (2004). An approach to ope rationalizing academic language for language test development purposes: Evidence from fifth-grade science and math (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 626). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
4. Hasselgren, A. (2000). The assessment of the English ability of young learners in Norwegian schools: An innovative approach. Language Testing, 77(2), 261-277.
5. McKay, P. (2005). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers' classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 22(4), 34-44.
7. Abedi, J., Courtney, M., Mirocha, J., Leon, S., & Goldberg, J. (2000). Language accommodation for large-scale assessment in science: assessing English language learners. Draft deliverable to Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs, OBEMLA, Contract No. R305B60002. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
8. Arkoudis, S., & O'Loughlin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(3), 284-304.
9. Bailey, A. L. (in press). From lambie to lambaste: The conceptualization, operationalization and use of academic language in the assessment of ELL students. In T. Wiley & K. Rolstad (Eds.), Rethinking school language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Bailey, A. L., & Butler, F. A. (2003). An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 611). Los Angeles: University of California National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
11. Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., LaFramenta, C., & Ong, C. (2004). Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary science classrooms (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 621). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
12. Ball, F., & Wilson, J. (2002). Research projects relating to YLE speaking tests. In University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (Ed.), Research Notes 7 (pp. 8-10). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
13. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 1-74.
14. Breen, M. P. (1997). The relationship between assessment frameworks and classroom pedagogy. In M. P. Breen, C. Barratt-Pugh, B. Derewianka, H. House, C. Hudson, T. Lumley, & M. Rohl (Eds.), Profiling ESL children. How teachers interpret and use national and state assessment frameworks, Vol. 1 (pp. 91-128). Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
15. Breen, M. P., Barratt-Pugh, C., Derewianka, B., House, H., Hudson, C., Lumley, T., et al. (1997). Profiling ESL children: How teachers interpret and use national and state assessment frameworks, Vol. 1. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
16. Brindley, G. (1998a). Assessing listening abilities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 171-191.
17. Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples, and emerging insights. Language Testing, 18(4), 393-408.
18. Broadfoot, P, M. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Brown, J. D. (1998). New ways of classroom assessment. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL).
20. Butler, F. A., & Bailey, A. L. (2002). Equity in the assessment of English language learners K-12. Idiom, 32(1), 1-6.
21. Butler, F. A., & Stevens, R. (1997). Accommodation strategies for English language learners on large-scale assessments: Student characteristics and other considerations (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 448). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
22. Cameron, L., & Besser, S. (2004). Writing in English as an additional language at Key Stage 2. Leeds: University of Leeds.
23. Carpenter, K., Fujii, N., & Kataoka, H. (1995). An oral interview procedure for assessing second language abilities in children. Language Testing, 12(2), 157-175.
24. Clair, N., Adger, C. T., Short, D., & Millen, E. (1998). Implementing standards with English language learners: Initial findings from four middle schools. Providence, RI: Northeast and Islands Regional Education Laboratory at Brown University.
25. Coombe, A. C., & Hubley, N. J. (2003). Themes in language assessment. In A. C. Coombe & N. J. Hubley (Eds.), Assessment practices (pp. 1-8). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
26. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 5-30.
28. Davison, C., & McKay, P. (2002). Counting and dis-counting learner group variation: English language and literacy standards in Australia. In A. B. M. Tsui & S. Andrews (Eds.), Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12(1), 77-94 [Special issue on maintaining and setting standards and language variation].
29. Davison, C., & Williams, A. (2001a). Learning from each other: Critical connections. Studies of English Language and Literacy Development, Volume 1. Melbourne: Language Australia. Victorian Child Literacy and ESL Research Centre.
30. Davison, C., & Williams, A. (2001b). Learning from each other: Literacy, labels and limitations. Studies of child English language and literacy development, K-12, Vol. 2. Canberra: Language Australia.
31. Gardner, S., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Conglomeration or chameleon? Teachers' representation of language in the assessment of learners with English as an additional language. Language Awareness, 10(2 & 3), 161-177.
32. Gatullo, F. (2000). Formative assessment in ELT primary (elementary) classrooms: An Italian case study. Language Testing, 17(2), 278-288.
33. Genishi, C., & Brainard, M. B. (1995). Assessment of bilingual children: Dilemma seeking solutions. In E. E. Garcia & B. McLaughlin (Eds.), Meeting the challenge of linguistic and cultural diversity in early childhood education (pp. 49-63). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Palmer Press.
35. Gonzalez, R. M. (1999). Bilingual/ESL Programs Evaluation Report, 1999-2000. Austin: Austin Independent School District, Texas.
36. Gottlieb, M. (2003). Large-scale assessment of English language learners. Addressing educational accountability in K-12 settings. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
37. Hall, K., Webber, B., Varley, S., Young, V., & Dorman, P. (1997). A study of teacher assessment at Key Stage 1. Cambridge Journal of Education, 27(107-122).
38. Hammond, J., & Derewianka, B. (1999). ESL and literacy education: Revisitng the relationship. Prospect, 14(2), 26-41.
39. Hartley, D. (1997). The new managerialism in education: A mission impossible? Journal of Education, 27(1), 47-58.
40. Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
41. Hill, D. A. (2000). Adding foreign languages to the elementary school curriculum: The Italian experience. In J. Moon & M. Nikolov (Eds.), Research into teaching English to young learners (pp. 137-152). Pecs, Hungary: University Press, Pecs.
42. Illinois State Board of Education. (2003). Foreign language standards. Retrieved 15th August 2003, from http://www.isbe.net/ils/foreignlanguage/fog28.html
43. Ingamells, J. (2002). The ESL Companion - Let's move forward. VATME (Victorian Association of TESOL and Multicultural Education) Newsletter(4), 3.
44. Jalongo, M. R. (2000). Early childhood language arts. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Jantscher, E., & Landsiedler, I. (2000). Foreign language education at Austrian primary. In M. Nikolov & H. Curtain (Eds.), An early start: Young learners and modern languages in Europe and beyond (pp. 13-27). Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe.
46. Johnstone, R. (2000). Context-sensitive assessment of modern languages in primary (elementary) and early secondary education: Scotland and the European experience. Language Testing, 17(2), 123-143.
47. Katz, A., Low, P., Stack, J., & Tasang, S.-L. (2004). A study of content area assessment for English language learners. Final Report prepared for Office of English Language Acquisition and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students, U.S. Department of Education. (Contract No. T292B010001). Oakland, CA: ARC Associates.
48. Koenig, J. A., & Bachman, L. F. (2004). Keeping score for all: the effects of inclusion and accommodation policies on large-scale educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press.
49. Leung, C. (2004). Developing formative teacher assessment: Knowledge, practice and change. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(1), 19-41.
50. Leung, C. (forthcoming). Classroom teacher assessment of second language development: construct as practice. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Leung, C., & Teasdale, A. (1997). What do teachers mean by speaking and listening? A contextualised study of assessment in multilingual classrooms in the English National Curriculum. In A. Huhta, V. Kohonen, L. Kurki-Suonio, & S. Louma (Eds.), New contexts, goals and alternatives in language assessment (pp. 291-324). Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
52. Liddicoat, A. J. (1997). Communicating in LOTE. Writing and oral interaction. Canberra: Modern Language Teachers' Association of the Australian Capital Territory.
53. Liu, K., Anderson, M., & Thurlow, M. (1999). Report on the participation and performance of limited English language proficiency students on Minnesota's Basic Standards Tests. St. Paul: Minnesota State Department of Children, Families, and Learning.
54. Low, L., Brown, S., Johnstone, R., & Pirrie, A. (1995). Foreign languages in primary schools. Stirling: Scottish Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, University of Stirling.
55. Marshall, H., & Gutteridge, M. (2002). Candidate performance in the Young Learner English Tests in 2000. In University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate(Ed.), Research Notes 7 (pp. 5-8). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
56. McKay, P. (1998). Discriminatory features for ESL learners in the literacy benchmarks. In Australian Language Matters Background Papers No. 2 (pp. 27-29). Melbourne: Australian Council of TESOL Associations.
57. McKay, P. (1999). The effectiveness of work samples as elaborations of profiles: Some comments based on the ACT LOTE Work Samples. Babel, Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations Inc, 34(3), 21-25.
58. McKay, P. (2000). On ESL standards for school-age learners. Language Testing, 17(2), 185-214.
59. McKay, P. (2004, March). Do standards have something to answer for? A pedagogic response to standards. Plenary address TESOL Arabia. Dubai.
60. McKay, P., Hudson, C., & Sapuppo, M. (1994). NLLIA ESL Bandscales. In P. McKay (Ed.), NLLIA ESL Development: Language and Literacy in Schools, Vol. 1. (Sections A, B, and C). Canberra: National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
61. Morris, P., Lo, M.-l., Chik, P.-m., & Chan, K.-k. (2000). One function, two systems -changing assessment in Hong Kong's primary schools. In B. Adamson, T. Kwan & K.-k. Chan (Eds.), Changing the curriculum: The impact of reform on primary schooling in Hong Kong (pp. 195-216). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
62. North, B. (1995). The development of a common framework scale of descriptors of language proficiency based on a theory of measurement. System, 23(4), 445-465.
63. Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429-462.
64. Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17(2), 217-244.
65. Rea-Dickins, P., & Rixon, S. (1997). The assessment of young learners of English as a Foreign language. In C. Clapham & D. Corson (Eds.), The encyclopaedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment (pp. 151-161). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
66. Rea-Dickins, P., & Rixon, S. (1999). Assessment of young learners' English: Reasons and means. In S. Rixon (Ed.), Young learners of English: Some research perspectives (pp. 89-101). Harlow, Essex: Longman.
67. Sadler, R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191-209.
68. Smith, J. K. (2003). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 22(4), 26-34.
69. Stevens, R. A., Butler, F. A., & Castellon-Wellington, M. (2000). Academic language and content assessment: Measuring the progress of ELLs (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 552). Los Angeles: University of Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Testing.
70. Swierzbin, B., Liu, K., & Thurlow, M. (2000). Initial perceptions of English as a second language educators on including students with limited English proficiency in Minnesota's high standards: State assessment series. St. Paul: Minnesota State Department of Children, Families and Learning.
71. Taylor, L., & Saville, N. (Eds.) (2002). Developing English language tests for young learners. In University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. English as a Foreign Language (EFL), Research Notes 7, (pp. 2-5). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
72. Teasdale, A., & Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing, 17(2), 163-184.
73. TESOL. (1997). ESL standards for pre-K-12 students. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
74. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. (2003). Cambridge young learners handbook. Cambridge: University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations.
75. Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the curriculum. In D. Scott (Ed.), Curriculum and assessment (pp. 165-181). Westport, CT: Ablex.