A dual group processes model of individual differences in prejudice

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 90-107

  Kreindler, Sara A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244440356     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_1     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M, Bown, N., & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 163-182.
2. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
3. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M. S., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
4. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
5. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
6. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 47-92.
9. Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1996). Cognitive responses to minority- or majority-based communications: Factors that underlie minority influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 105-121.
10. Aronson, E. (1992). The social animal (6th ed.). New York: Freeman.
11. Begue, L. (2001). Social judgment of abortion: A black-sheep effect in a Catholic sheepfold. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 640-649.
12. Billig, M. (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
13. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. E. Ellemers, R. Spears, & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
14. Buss, A. H., & Portnoy, N. W. (1967). Pain tolerance and group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 106-108.
15. Butler, J. C. (2000). Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 1-14.
16. Cadinu, M. R., & Cerchioni, M. (2001). Compensatory biases after in-group threat: "Yeah, but we have a good personality." European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 353-367.
17. Castano, E., Paladino, M. P., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2002). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 365-385.
18. Christie, R. (1954). Authoritarianism re-examined. In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of "The authoritarian personality"(pp.123-196).Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
19. Coull, A., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Paladino, M. P., & Leemans, V. (2001). Protecting the in-group: Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening in-group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 327-339.
20. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (2001). Majority and minority influence: A single process self-categorization analysis. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 91-121). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
21. Davis, K. E., & Jones, E. E. (1960). Changes in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 402-410.
22. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.
23. Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
24. Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629-640.
25. Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63-84.
26. Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.
27. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., Du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
28. Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
29. Eigenberger, M. E. (1998). Fear as a correlate of authoritarianism. Psychological Reports, 83, 1395-1409.
30. Ellemers, N., Van Rijswijk, W., Bruins, J., & de Gilder, D. (1998). Group commitment as a moderator of attributional and behavioral responses to power use. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 555-573.
31. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
32. Eubanks, J. P. (2000). The effects of stability, group norm, and social dominance orientation on in-group bias in high-power groups. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The sciences and engineering, 60, 4963.
33. Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. New York: Routledge.
34. Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741-770.
35. Fielding, K. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics, 1, 39-51.
36. Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation - The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on lost et al. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 376-382.
37. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308-318.
38. Greenblum, J., & Pearlin, L. I. (1953). Vertical mobility and prejudice: A social-psychological analysis. In R. Bendix & S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Class status and power (pp. 480-491). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
39. Guimond, S. (2000). Group socialization and prejudice: The social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 335-354.
40. Guimond, S., & Dambrum, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900-912.
41. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
42. Haslam, S. A., McGarty, C., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Salient group memberships and persuasion: The role of social identity in the validation of beliefs. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 29-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
44. Heaven, P. C. L., & Bucci, S. (2001). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15, 49-56.
45. Heaven, P. C. L., & Connors, J. R. (2001). A note on the value correlates of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 925-930.
46. Heaven, P. C. L., & St. Quintin, D. (2003). Personality factors predict racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 625-634.
47. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
48. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
49. Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
50. Hutchison, P., & Abrams, D. (2003). Ingroup identification moderates stereotype change in reaction to ingroup deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 497-506.
51. Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). "We're all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207.
52. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 603-609.
53. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 29, 339-375.
54. Kaufman, W. C. (1957). Status, authoritarianism, and anti-Semitism. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 379-382.
55. Kreindler, S. A. (2003). Of insurgents and innovators: Contextual authoritarianism and influence in political parties and beyond. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.
56. Lavine, H., Burgess, D., Snyder, M., Transue, J., Sullivan, J. L., Haney, B., et al. (1999). Threat, authoritarianism, and voting: An investigation of personality and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 337-347.
57. Levin, S., Federico, C. M., Sidanius, J., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 144-157.
58. Mackie, D. M. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720-728.
59. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Pàez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
60. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serodio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
61. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The "Black Sheep Effect": Extremity of judgments towards in-group members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
62. McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Abalakina-Paap, M. A. (1992). Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1004-1010.
63. McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472-488.
64. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
65. Newcomb, T. M. (1942) Community roles in attitude formation. American Sociological Review, 7, 621-630
66. Nöel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral in-group membership status and public negativity toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137.
67. Perreault, S., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92-103.
68. Platow, M. J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair or unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465-494.
69. Platow, M. J., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader in-group prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508-1519.
70. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 741-763.
71. Randsley de Moura, G., & Abrams, D. (2002, September). Subjective group dynamics: Investigating the role of the intragroup context. Paper presented at the BPS Social Psychology Section Annual Conference. Huddersfield, England.
72. Ray, J. J., & Lovejoy, F. H. (1990). Does attitude to authority exist? Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 765-769.
73. Reynolds, K. J, Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 427-434.
74. Rokeach, M. (1965). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
75. Sales, S. M., & Friend, K. E. (1973). Success and failure as determinants of level of authoritarianism. Behavioral Science, 18, 163-172.
76. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one's prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510-517.
77. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Will the real social dominance theory please stand up? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 215-219.
78. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
79. Schofield, P. E., Pattison, P. E., Hill, D. J., & Borland, R. (2001). The influence of group identification on the adoption of peer group smoking norms. Psychology and Health, 16, 1-16.
80. Schultz, P. W., Stone, W. F., & Christie, R. (1997). Authoritarianism and mental rigidity: The Einstellung problem revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 3-9.
81. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension. Oxford, England: Harper & Brothers.
82. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.
83. Shils, E. A. (1954). Authoritarianism, right and left. In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of "The authoritarian personality" (pp. 24-49). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
84. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1996). Consensual social dominance orientation and its correlates within the hierarchical structure of American society. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 385-408.
85. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2003). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of inequality: A reply to Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen and Wilson & Liu. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 207-213.
86. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.
87. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
88. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, in-group attachment, and social dominance orientation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194-216.
89. Skevington, S. M. (1980). Intergroup relations and social change within a nursing context. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 201-213.
90. Sparks, P., & Durkin, K. (1987). Moral reasoning and political orientation: The context sensitivity of individual rights and democratic principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 931-936.
91. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
92. Stone, W. F. (1980). The myth of left-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 2, 3-19.
93. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
94. Tavris, C. (1992). The mismeasure of woman. New York: Simon & Schuster.
95. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
96. Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365-375.
97. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
98. Tetlock, P. E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 129-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
99. Tetlock, P. E., Armor, D., & Peterson, R. S. (1984). The slavery debate in antebellum America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 115-126.
100. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
101. Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 199-206.
102. Verkuyten, M., & Hagendoorn, L. (1998). Prejudice and self-categorization: The variable role of authoritarianism and in-group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 99-110.
103. Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31-47.
104. Weber, U., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2002). Perceived legitimacy of intergroup status differences: Its prediction by relative ingroup prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 449-470.
105. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126-134.
106. Wilson, M. S., & Liu, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187-198.