Engaged listenership in spoken academic discourse: The case of student-tutor meetings

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 67-85

  Farr, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444500039     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00035-8     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for 'casual' "okay" usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325-352.
2. Beattie, G. W. (1981). Interruption in conversational interaction, and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants. Linguistics, 19, 15-35.
3. Bilous, F. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same and mixed gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8(3/4), 183-194.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universal in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Canagarajah, S. (2002). Multilingual writers and the academic community: towards a critical relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 29-44.
6. Carter, R. (1997). Speaking Englishes, speaking cultures, using CANCODE. Prospect, 12(2), 4-11.
7. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Spoken Grammar: what is it and how can we teach it? English Language Teaching Journal, 49(3), 207-218.
8. Celce-Murcia, M. (1995). Discourse analysis and the teaching of listening. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics. Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Conrad, S. (2000). Will corpus linguistics revolurtionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 548-560.
10. Cook, G. (1998). The uses of reality: a reply to Ronald Carter. English Language Teaching Journal, 52(1), 57-63.
11. Crystal, D. (2000). Emerging Englishes. English Teaching Professional, 14, 3-6.
12. Cummins, J. (2000). Academic language learning, transformative pedagogy, and information technology: towards a critical balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 537-547.
13. Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1968). Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(1), 79-84.
14. Drummond, K., & Hopper, R. (1993a). Back channels revisited: acknowledgement tokens and speaker incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(2), 157-177.
15. Drummond, K., & Hopper, R. (1993b). Some uses of Yeah. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(2), 203-212.
16. Duncan, S. (1974). On the structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society, 2, 161-180.
17. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods and theory. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Duncan, S., & Niederehe, G. (1974). On signalling that it's your turn to speak. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 234-247.
19. Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1982). Phatic, metalingual and metacommunicative functions in discourse: gambits and repairs. In N. E. Enkvist (Ed.), Impromptu speech: A symposium. Abo Akademi.
20. Farr, F., & O'Keeffe, A. (2002). Would as a hedging device in an Irish context: an intra-varietal comparison of institutionalised spoken interaction. In R. Reppen, D. Biber, & S. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Fellegy, A. M. (1995). Patterns and functions of minimal response. American Speech, 70(2), 196-199.
22. Ferguson, N. (1977). Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 295-302.
23. Fries, C. C. (1952). The structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
24. Gallois, C., & Markel, N. N. (1975). Turn taking: social personality and conversational style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1134-1140.
25. Gardener, R. (1997a). The listener and minimal responses in conversational interaction. Prospect, 12(2), 12-32.
26. Gardener, R. (1997b). The conversation object Mm: a weak and variable acknowledging token. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(2), 131-156.
27. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. London: Irvington.
28. Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9, 205-217.
29. Haviland, J. B. (1977). Gossip, reputation, and knowledge in Zinacactan, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30. Hayashi, T., & Hayashi, R. (1991). Back channel or main channel: a cognitive approach based on floor and speech acts. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 2, 119-138.
31. Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12.
32. Jefferson, G. (1983). Two explorations of the organisation of overlapping talk in conversation. Tilburg papers in Language and Literature, 28. The Netherlands: Tilburg University.
33. Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens "Yeah" and "Mm hm". Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 197-216.
34. Johns, A. M., & Swales, J. M. (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 13-28.
35. Jordan, R. R. (2002). The growth of EAP in Britain. Journal of English for Academic. Purposes, 1(1), 69-78.
36. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
37. Lakoff, R. (1974). What you can do with words: politeness, pragmatics and performatives. In Berkeley studies in syntax and semantics, Vol. 1, XVI. California: Berkeley Institute of Human Learning.
38. Lerner, G. H. (1989). Notes on overlap management in conversation: the case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 167-177.
39. Maynard, S. K. (1990). Conversation management in contrast: listener response in Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 397-412.
40. Maynard, S. K. (1997). Analyzing interactional management in native/non-native English conversation: a case of listener response. IRAL, 35(1), 37-60.
41. McCarthy, M. J. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. McCarthy, M. J. (2002). Good listenership made plain: non-minimal response tokens in British and American Spoken English. In R. Reppen, D. Biber, & S. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Meltzer, L., Morris, W. N., & Hayes, D. P. (1971). Interruption outcomes and vocal amplitute: explorations is social psychophysics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 392-402.
44. Murray, S. O. (1987). Power and solidarity in 'interruption'. Symbolic Interaction, 10, 101-110.
45. Murray, S. O. (1988). The sound of simultaneous speech, the meaning of interruption: a rejoinder. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 115-116.
46. Natale, M., Entin, E., & Jaffe, J. (1979). Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 865-878.
47. O'Keeffe, A., & Adolphs, S. Genre before gender: a corpus based examination of the discourse functions of back channels in female conversations (in press).
48. O'Keeffe, A., & Farr, F. Using language corpora in language teacher education: pedagogic, linguistic and contextual insights, (submitted).
49. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as a foreign language. London: Longman.
50. Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 253-269.
51. Reece, M. M., & Whitman, R. N. (1962). Expressive movements, warmth, and verbal reinforcement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(3), 234-236.
52. Rim, Y. (1977). Personality variables and interruptions in small discussions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 247-251.
53. Schegloft, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on language and linguistics. Analysing discourse: text and talk. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
54. Schegloft, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382.
55. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
56. Sinclair, J.McH., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1982). Written language: exploring orality and literacy. NJ: Ablex.
58. Tannen, D. (1985). Conversational style. New York: Ablex.
59. Tottie, G. (1991). Conversational style in British and American English: the case of backchannels. In K. Aijmer, & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics. London: Longman.
60. Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 511-535.
61. White, S. (1989). Backchannels across cultures: a study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society, 18, 59-76.
62. White, R. (1997). Back channelling, repair, pausing, and private speech. Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 314-344.
63. Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
64. Zimmerman, D. H. (1993). Acknowledgement tokens and speaker incipiency revisited. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(2), 179-194.
65. Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex. Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.