First Principles Predictions of the Structure and Function of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Validation for Bovine Rhodopsin

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1904-1921

  Trabanino, Rene J ^a   Hall, Spencer E ^a   Vaidehi, Nagarajan ^a   Floriano, Wely B ^a   Kam, Victor W T ^a   Goddard III, William A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

11 CIS RETINAL; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; RHODOPSIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CATTLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

BOS TAURUS; BOVINAE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS PHAGE 187;

EID: 1942487807     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74256-3     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Altenbach, C., K. Yang, D. L. Farrens, Z. T. Farahbakhsh, H. G. Khorana, and W. L. Hubbell. 1996. Structural features and light-dependent changes in the cytoplasmic interhelical E-F loop region of rhodopsin: a site-directed spin-labeling study. Biochemistry. 35:12470-12478.
2. Altenbach, C., K. Cai, J. Klein-Seetharaman, H. G. Khorana, and W. L. Hubbell. 2001a. Structure and function in rhodopsin: mapping light-dependent changes in distance between residue 65 in helix TM1 and residues in the sequence 306-319 at the cytoplasmic end of helix TM7 and in helix H8. Biochemistry. 40:15483-15492.
3. Altenbach, C., J. Klein-Seetharaman, K. Cai, H. G. Khorana, and W. L. Hubbell. 2001b. Structure and function in rhodopsin: mapping light-dependent changes in distance between residue 316 in helix 8 and residues in the sequence 60-75, covering the cytoplasmic end of helices TM1 and TM2 and their connection loop CL1. Biochemistry. 40:15493-15500.
4. Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
5. Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, W. E. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410.
6. Archer, E., B. Maigret, C. Escrieut, L. Pradayrol, and D. Fourmy. 2003. Rhodopsin crystal: new template yielding realistic models of G-protein-coupled receptors? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 24:36-40.
7. Borhan, B., M. L. Souto, H. Imai, Y. Schichida, and K. Nakanashi. 2000. Movement of retinal along the visual transduction path. Science. 288:2209-2212.
8. Boume, H. R., and E. C. Meng. 2000. Structure-rhodopsin sees the light. Science. 289:733-734.
9. Bower, M., F. E. Cohen, and R. L. Dunbrack, Jr. 1997. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J. Mol. Biol. 267:1268-1282.
10. Brameld, K. A., and W. A. Goddard. 1999. Ab initio quantum mechanical study of the structures and energies for the pseudorotation of 5′-dehydroxy analogues of 2′-deoxyribose and ribose sugars. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121:985-993.
11. Comette, J. L., K. B. Cease, H. Margalit, J. L. Spouge, J. A. Berzofsky, and C. Delisi. 1987. Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 195:659-685.
12. Datta, D., N. Vaidehi, X. Xu, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 2002. Mechanism for antibody catalysis of the oxidation of water by singlet dioxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2636-2641.
13. Datta, D., N. Vaidehi, W. B. Floriano, K. S. Kim, N. V. Prasadarao, and W. A. Goddard. 2003. Interaction of E. coli outer-membrane protein A with sugars on the receptors of the brain microvascular endothelial cells. Proteins. 50:213-221.
14. Ding, H. Q., N. Karasawa, and W. A. Goddard. 1992. Atomic level simulations on a million particles-the cell multipole method for Coulomb and London nonbond interactions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 97: 4309-4315.
15. Donnelly, D. 1993. Modeling alpha-helical transmembrane domains, Biochem. Soc. 21:36-39.
16. Donnelly, D., J. P. Overington, and T. L. Blundell. 1994. The predicfion and orientation of alpha-helices from sequence alignments-the combined use of environment-dependent substitution tables, Fourier-transform methods and helix capping rules. Protein Eng. 7:645-653.
17. Eisenberg, D., R. M. Weiss, and T. C. Terwilliger. 1984. The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 8:140-144,
18. Eisenberg, D., R. M. Weiss, T. C. Terwilliger, and W. Wilcox. 1982. Hydrophobic moments and protein structure. Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc. 17:109-120.
19. Ewing, T. A., and I. D. Kuntz. 1997. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening. J. Comput. Chem. 18:1175-1189.
20. Farrens, D. L., C. Altenbach, K. Yang, W. L. Hubbell, and H. G. Khorana. 1996. Requirement of rigid-body motion of transmembrane helices for light activation of rhodopsin. Science. 274:768-770.
21. Floriano, W. B., N. Vaidehi, M. Singer, G. Shepherd, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 2000. Molecular mechanisms underlying differential odor responses of a mouse olfactory receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:10712-10716.
22. Floriano, W. B., N. Vaidehi, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 2004a. Making sense of olfaction through molecular structure and function prediction of olfactory receptors. Chem. Senses. In press.
23. Floriano, W. B., N. Vaidehi, G. Zamanakos, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 2004b. Virtual ligand screening of large molecule databases using hierarchical docking protocol (HierVLS). J. Med. Chem. 47:56-71.
24. 2 adrenergic receptor and its binding site for agonists and antagonists, PNAS. 101:2736-2741,
25. 1b-adrenergic receptor highlight the role of the helix 3/helix 6 interface in receptor activation. Mol. Pharma. 61:1025-1032.
26. Herzyk, P., and R. E. Hubbard. 1995. Automated method for modeling seven-helix transmembrane receptors from experimental data. Biophys. J. 69:2419-2442.
27. Jain, A., N. Vaidehi, and G. Rodriguez. 1993. A fast recursive algorithm for molecular-dynamics simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 106:258-268.
28. Kalani, M. Y. S., N. Vaidehi, S. E. Hall, R. J. Trabanino, P. L. Freddolino, M. A. Kalani, W. B. Floriano, V. W. T. Kam, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 2004. The predicted 3D structure of the human D2 dopamine receptor and the binding site and binding affinities for agonists and antagonists. PNAS. 103:3815-3820.
29. Kekenes-Huskey, P. M., N. Vaidehi, W. B. Floriano, and W. A. Goddard. 2003. Fidelity of phenyl alanyl tRNA synthetase in binding the natural amino acids. J. Chem. Phys. 107:11549-11557.
30. Laskowski, R. A., M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, and J. M. Thomton. 1993. PROCHECK-a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26:283-291.
31. Lim, K.-T., S. Brunett, M. Iotov, R. B. McClurg, N. Vaidehi, S. Dasgupta, S. Taylor, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 1997. Molecular dynamics for very large systems on massively parallel computers: the MPSim program. J. Comput. Chem. 18:501-521.
32. Lin, S. W., and T. P. Sakmar. 1996. Specific tryptophan UV-absorbance changes are probes of the transition of rhodopsin to its active state. Biochemistry. 35:11149-11159.
33. Lomize, A. L., I. D. Poghozeva, and H. I. Mosberg. 1999. Structural organization of G-protein-coupled receptors, J. Comp. Aided Mol. Design. 13:325-353,
34. MacKerell, A. D., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, I. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102: 3586-3616.
35. Malnic, B., J. Hirono, T. Sato, and L. B. Buck. 1999. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell. 96:713-723.
36. Marti-Renom, M. A., A. C. Stuart, A. Fiser, R. Sanchez, F. Melo, and A. Sali. 2000. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomem. 29:291-325.
37. Mathiowetz, A. M., A. Jain, N. Karasawa, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 1994. Protein simulations using techniques suitable for very large systems-the cell multipole method for nonbond interactions and the Newton-Euler inverse mass operator method for internal coordinate dynamics. Proteins. 20:227-247.
38. Mayo, S. L., B. D. Olafson, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 1990. DREIDING-a generic force field for molecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 94:8897-8909.
39. Melia, T. J., C. W. Cowan, J. K. Angleson, and T. G. Wensel. 1997. A comparison of the efficiency of G-protein activation by ligand-free and light-activated forms of rhodopsin. Biophys. J. 73:3182-3191.
40. Okada, T., O. P. Ernst, K. Palczewski, and K. P. Hofmann. 2001. Activation of rhodopsin: new insights from structural and biochemical studies. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26:318-324.
41. Palczewski, K., T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C. Behnke, H. Motoshima, B. Fox, I. Trong, D. Teller, T. Okada, R. Stenkamp, M. Yamamoto, and M. Miyano. 2000. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G-protein-coupled receptor. Science. 289:739-745.
42. Rappé, A. K., and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 1991. Charge equilibration for molecular-dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 95:3358-3363.
43. Saam, J., E. Tajkhorshid, S. Hayashi, and K. Schulten, 2002, Molecular dynamics investigation of primary photoinduced events in the activation of rhodopsin, Biophys. J. 83:3097-3112.
44. Schertler, G. F. X. 1998. Structure of rhodopsin. Eye. 12:504-510.
45. Schöneberg, T., A. Schulz, and T. Gudermann. 2002. The structural basis of G-protein-coupled receptor function and dysfunction in human diseases. Rev. Phys. Biochem. Pharm. 144:145-227.
46. Shacham, S., M. Topf, N. Avisar, F. Glaser, Y. Marantz, S. Bar-Haim, S. Noiman, Z. Naor, and O. M. Becker. 2001. Modeling the three-dimensional structure of GPCRs from sequence. Med. Res. Rev. 21: 472-483.
47. Spassov, V. Z., L. Yan, and S. Szalma. 2002. Introducing an implicit membrane in Generalized-Bom solvent accessibility continuum solvent models. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:8726-8738.
48. Strader, C. D., T. M. Fong, M. R. Tota, D. Underwood, and R. A. Dixon. 1994. Structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:101-132.
49. Strange, P. G. 1998. Three-state and two-state models. Trends Pharm. Sci. 19:85-86.
50. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. Clustal-W-improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
51. Vaidehi, N., W. B. Floriano, R. Trabanino, S. E. Hall, P. Freddolino, E. J. Choi, G. Zamanakos, and W. A. Goddard. 2002. Prediction of structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:12622-12627.
52. Vaidehi, N., A. Jain, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 1996. Constant temperature constrained molecular dynamics: the Newton-Euler inverse mass operator method. J. Phys. Chem. 100:10508-10517.
53. Vriend, G. 1990, WHAT IF-a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8:52-56.
54. Wallin, E., and G. von Heijne, 1998. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 7:1029-1038.
55. Wang, P., N. Vaidehi, D. A. Tirrell, and W. A. Goddard 3rd. 2002. Virtual screening for binding of phenylalanine analogues to phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:14442-14449.
56. Wilson, S., and D. Bergsma. 2000. Orphan G-protein-coupled receptors: novel drug targets for the pharmaceutical industry. Drug Des. Discov. 17:105-114.
57. Zamanakos, G. 2002. A fast and accurate analytical method for the computation of solvent effects in molecular simulations. Chemistry PhD thesis. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.