Choosing measurement poses for robot calibration with the local convergence method and Tabu search

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 501-518

  Daney, David ^a   Papegay, Yves ^a   Madeline, Blaise ^b  

^a French National Institute for Computer Science and Control ^*  (France)

^b IMERIR Engineering School of Robotic and Computer Science   (France)

Author keywords

Calibration; Experimentation; Local convergence; Parallel robot; Robust design; Tabu search

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; DATA ACQUISITION; OPTIMIZATION;

EXPERIMENTATION; LOCAL CONVERGENCE; PARALLEL ROBOT; ROBUST DESIGN; TABU SEARCH;

ROBOTS;

EID: 19344369191     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364905053185     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baeck, T., Fogel, D. B., and Michalewicz, Z. editors. 1997. Handbook of Evolutionary Computation. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK.
2. Borm, J. H., and Menq, C. H. 1991. Determination of optimal measurement configurations for robot calibration based on observability measure. Journal of Robotic Systems 10(1):51-63.
3. Chiu, Y. J., and Perng, M. H. 2004. Self-calibration of a general hexapod manipulator with enhanced precision in 5-dof motions. Mechanism and Machine Theory 39:1-23.
4. Daney, D. 2002. Optimal measurement configurations for Gough platform calibration. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Washington, DC, May 11-15, pp. 147-152.
5. Daney, D. 2003. Kinematic calibration of the Gough platform. Robotica 21(6):677-690.
6. Driels, M. R., and Pathre, U. S. 1990. Significance of observation strategy on the design of robot calibration experiments. Journal of Robotic Systems 7(2):197-223.
7. Glover, F. 1986. Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Computers and Operation Research 13:533-549.
8. Glover, F., and Laguna, M. 1997. Tabu Search. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, pp. 408.
9. Hao, J. K., Galinier, P., and Habib, M. 1999. Métaheuristiques pour l'optimisation combinatoire et l'affectation sous contraintes. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle 13(2):283-324.
10. Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence, 1st edition. University of Michigan, MI.
11. Khalil, W., Gautier, M., and Enguehard, Ch. 1991. Identifiable parameters and optimum configurations for robots calibration. Robotica 9:63-70.
12. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., and Vecchi, M. P. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671-680.
13. Lemaréchal, C., Bonnans, J. F., Gilbert, J. C., and Sagastizabal, C. A. 2003. Numerical Optimization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
14. Lintott, A., and Dunlop, G. 1996. Calibration of a parallel topology robot. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing (ISRAM), Montpellier, France, pp. 429-434.
15. Masory, O., Wang, J., and Zhuang, H. 1997. Kinematic modeling and calibration of a Stewart platform. Advanced Robotics 11:519-539.
16. Merlet, J.-P. 2000. Parallel Robots. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
17. Merlet, J.-P. 2004. Solving the forward kinematics of a Gough-type parallel manipulator with interval analysis. International Journal of Robotics Research 23(3):221-236.
18. Mitchell, T. J. 1974. An algorithm for the construction of d-optimal experimental designs. Techometrics 16:203-210.
19. Nahvi, A., and Hollerbach, J. M. 1996. The noise amplification index for optimal pose selection in robot calibration. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Minneapolis, MN, pp. 647-654.
20. Nahvi, A., Hollerbach, J. M., and Hayward, V. 1994. Calibration of a parallel robot using multiple kinematics closed loops. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), San Diego, CA, pp. 407-412.
21. Rouillier, F., Faugère, J. C., Merlet, J. P., and Rolland, L. 2005. Forward position analysis for parallel robots. In preparation.
22. Takeda, Y., Shen, G., and Funabashi, H. 2004. A DBB-based kinematic calibration method for in-parallel actuated mechanisms using a Fourier series. Transactions of the ASME 126:856-865.
23. Vischer, P. 1996. Improve the accuracy of parallel robots. Ph.D. Thesis, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne.
24. Walter, E., and Pronzato, L. 1997. Identification of Parametric Models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
25. Zhuang, H., Wang, K., and Roth, Z. S. 1994. Optimal selection of measurement configurations for robot calibration using simulated annealing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), San Diego, CA, pp. 393-398.
26. Zhuang, H., Wu, J., and Huang, W. 1996. Optimal planning of robot calibration experiments by genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Minneapolis, MN, pp. 981-986.
27. Zhuang, H., Jiahua, Y., and Masory, O. 1998. Calibration of Stewart platforms and other parallel manipulators by minimizing inverse kinematic residuals. Journal of Robotic Systems 15:395-405.