Theme issue: Developing research in technology education

Research in Science Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 3-14

  Jones, Alister ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844379132     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012658211512     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Black, P. (1998). Testing: Friend or foe? Theory and practice of assessment and testing. London: The Falmer Press.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
4. Carr, M., McGee, C., Jones, A., McKinley, E., Bell, B., Barr, H., & Simpson, T. (2000). The effects of curricula and assessment on pedagogical approaches and on education outcomes. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
5. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
6. De Vries, M. (2000, December). Can we train researchers and teachers to make a team? Win-win strategies in technology education. Paper presented to the 1st Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Gold Coast, Australia.
7. Gilbert, J. K. (1994). The interface between science and technology in schools (SAMEpapers 1994, pp. 144-164). Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
8. Goodson, I. F. (1985). Social histories of the secondary curriculum. Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
9. Hansen, R., & Froelich, M. (1994). Defining technology and technological education: A crisis, or cause for celebration. International Journal Technology and Design Education, 4(2), 179-207.
10. Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41.
11. Hennessy, S., McCormick, R., & Murphy, P. (1993). The myth of general problem solving capability: Design and technology as an example. The Curriculum Journal, 4(1), 73-89.
12. Jones, A. (1997). Recent research in student learning of technological concepts and processes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2), 83-96.
13. Jones, A. (1999). The influence of teachers' subcultures on curriculum innovation. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching (pp. 155-171). London: Falmer Press.
14. Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1993). Analysis of student technological capability (Vol. 2) (Working Papers of the Learning in Technology Education Project). Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
15. Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1994). Student technological capability: Where do we start? SAMEpapers, 165-186.
16. Jones, A., Mather, V., & Carr, M. (1995). Issues in the practice of technology education. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
17. Kimbell, R. (1994). Tasks in technology. An analysis of their purposes and effects. International Journal Technology and Design Education, 4(3), 241-256.
18. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., & Kelly, V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design and technology. London: Schools Examination and Assessment Council.
19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20. Layton, D. (1994). A school subject in the making?: The search for fundamentals. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovation in science and technology education (Vol. 4, pp. 11-28). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
21. Lewis, T. (1999). Research in technology education - Some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 10, 41-56.
22. McCormick, R. (1992). The evolution of current practice in technology education; Part 1. Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau, 18(2), 19-28.
23. McCormick, R., Murphy, P., & Harrison, M. (1992). Teaching and learning technology. London: Addison-Wesley.
24. McCormick, R., Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (1994). Problem solving processes in technology education: A pilot study. International Journal Technology and Design Education, 4(1), 5-34.
25. McCormick, R., Sparkes, J., & Newey, C. (Eds.) (1992). Technology for technology education. London: Addison-Wesley.
26. Mavrommattis, Y (1997). Understanding assessment in the classroom: Phases of the assessment process - the assessment episode. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 381-399.
27. Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology. The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28. Moreland, J. P. (1998). Technology education teacher development: The importance of experiences in technological practice. Unpublished M.Ed thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
29. Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 283-305.
30. Moreland J., Jones, A., & Chambers, M. (2000, December). Researching and developing intervention strategies for enhancing technology teacher assessment practices: The results of a three-year study. Paper presented at 1st Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research Gold Coast, Australia.
31. Murphy, P., McCormick, R., & Davidson, M. (1996). Problem solving in design and technology: Uncharted waters. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
32. Northover, B. A. (1997). Teacher development in biotechnology: Teachers' perceptions and practice. Unpublished M.Ed thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
33. Olson, J., & Henning Hansen, K. (1994). Research on technology education. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. V, pp. 225-239). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
34. Paechter, C. (1991, September). Subject subcultures and the negotiation of open work: Conflict and co-operation in cross-curricular. Paper presented to St. Hilda's conference, Warwick University, England.
35. Petrina, S. (1998). The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the journal of technology education Volumes 1-8. Journal of Technology Education, 10, 27-57.
36. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84.
38. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
39. Zuga, K. (1997). An analysis of technology education research in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 203-211.