Enhancing teachers' technological knowledge and assessment practices to enhance student learning in technology: A two-year classroom study

Research in Science Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 155-176

  Moreland, Judy ^a   Jones, Alister ^a   Northover, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Formative assessment; Teacher knowledge and student learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543083468     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012670514238     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (1997). Formative assessment and science education. Research Report, Learning in Science Project (Assessment). Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
2. Black, P. J. (1998). Testing: Friend or foe? Theory and practice of assessment and testing. London: The Falmer Press.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
4. Blenkin, G. (1992). Progression, observation and assessment in early education: The context. In G. V. Blenkin, & A. V. Kelly (Eds.), Assessment in early childhood education (pp. 24-45). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
6. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474-482.
7. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
8. Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press.
9. Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355-392.
10. Goodson, I. F. (1985). Subjects for study. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Social histories of the secondary curriculum. London, Falmer Press.
11. Hattie, J., & Jaeger, R. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A deductive approach. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 111-122.
12. Hurst, V., & Lally, M. (1992). Assessment and the nursery curriculum. In G. V. Blenkin, & A. V. Kelly (Eds.), Assessment in early childhood education (pp. 46-68). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
13. Jones, A. (1999). Teachers' subject subcultures and curriculum innovation: the example of technology education. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Research teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 155-171). London: Falmer Press.
14. Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of technology education: Implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22, 230-239.
15. Jones, A. T., Mather, V., & Carr, M. D. (1995). Issues in the practice of technology education. Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
16. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (1998). Assessment in technology education: Developing a framework for research (Working Paper 522, Research in Assessment of Primary Technology Project). Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
17. Jones, A., & Simon, S. (1991). Strategies for educational change: The work of the OPENS project in the context of a new national curriculum for science. Auckland, NZ: Longman Paul (SAMEpapers 1991).
18. Mavromattis, Y (1997). Understanding assessment in the classroom: Phases of the assessment process - the assessment episode. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 381-399.
19. Ministry of Education. (1993). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
20. Ministry of Education. (1994). Assessment: Policy to practice. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
21. Ministry of Education. (1995). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
22. Moreland, J. P. (1998). Technology education teacher development: The importance of experiences in technological practice. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
23. Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (1999). Case studies of classroom practice in technology (Working Paper 523, Research in Assessment of Primary Technology Project). Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
24. Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 283-305.
25. Northover, A. B. (1997). Teacher development in biotechnology: Teachers' perceptions and practice. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
26. Paechter, C. (1992). Subject subcultures and the negotiation of open work: Conflict and co-operation in cross-curricular coursework. In R. McCormick, P. Murphy, & M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and learning technology (pp. 279-288). Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley, Open University Press.
27. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
28. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84.
29. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.