Peracarid monophyly and interordinal phylogeny inferred from nuclear small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences (Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida)

Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 117-157

  Spears, Trisha ^a   DeBry, Ronald W ^b   Abele, Lawrence G ^a   Chodyla, Katarzyna ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

AMPHIPODA; CRUSTACEA; CUMACEA; ISOPODA; LOPHOGASTRIDA; MALACOSTRACA; MYSIDA; MYSIDACEA; PERACARIDA; SPELAEOGRIPHACEA; TANAIDACEA; THERMOSBAENACEA;

EID: 18744408763     PISSN: 0006324X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2988/0006-324X(2005)118[117:PMAIPI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Archie, J. W. 1989. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data. - Systematic Zoology 38:239-252.
2. Anderson, F. E., & D. L. Swofford. 2004. Should we be worried about long-branch attraction in real data sets? Investigations using metazoan 18S rDNA. - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33:440-451.
3. Averof, M., & N. H. Patel. 1997. Crustacean appendage evolution associated with changes in Hox gene expression. - Nature 388:682-686.
4. Boas, J. E. V. 1883. Studien über die Verwandtschafts-beziehungen der Malakostraken. - Morphologisches Jahrbuch 8:485-579.
5. Bowman, T. E., S. P. Garner, R. R. Hessler, T. M. Iliffe, & H. L. Sanders. 1985. Mictacea, a new order of Crustacea Peracarida. - Journal of Crustacean Biology 5:74-78.
6. Brandt, A., & G. C. B. Poore. 2003. Higher classification of the flabelliferan and related Isopoda based on a reappraisal of relationships. - Invertebrate Systematics 17:893-923.
7. Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. - Evolution 42:795-803.
8. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. - Cladistics 10:295-304.
9. Briggs, D. E. G., M. J. Weedon, & M. A. Whyte. 1993. Arthropoda (Crustacea excluding Ostracoda). Chapter 18 in M. J. Benton, ed., Fossil record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, 845 pp.
10. Buckley, T. R., & C. W. Cunningham. 2002. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:394-405.
11. Calman, W. T. 1904. On the classification of the Crustacea Malacostraca. - The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (7)13:144-158.
12. Calman, W. T. 1909. Part VII. Appendiculata, Third Fascicle. Crustacea. Pp. 1-346 in E. R. Lankester, ed., A treatise on zoology. Adams and Black, London.
13. Camin, J. H., & R. R. Sokal. 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. - Evolution 19:311-326.
14. Casanova, J.-P., L. De Jong, & E. Faure. 1998. Interrelationships of the two families constituting the Lophogastrida. (Crustacea: Mysidacea) inferred from morphological and molecular data. - Marine Biology 132:59-65.
15. Choe, C. P., J. M. Hancock, U. W. Hwang, & W. Kim. 1999. Analysis of the primary sequence and secondary structure of the unusually long SSU rRNA of the soil bug Armadillidium vulgare. - Journal of Molecular Evolution 49:798-805.
16. Coleman, C. O. 1990. Anatomy of the alimentary canal of Parandania boecki (Stebbing, 1888) (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Stegocephalidae) from the Antarctic Ocean. - Journal of Natural History 24:1573-1585.
17. Conant, G. C., & P. O. Lewis. 2001. Effects of nucleotide composition bias on the success of the parsimony criterion in phylogenetic inference. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1024-1033.
18. Crandall, K. A., D. J. Harris, & J. W. Fetzner, Jr. 2000. The monophyletic origin of freshwater crayfish estimated from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 267:1679-1686.
19. Dahl, E. 1977. The amphipod functional model and its bearing upon systematics and phylogeny. - Zoologica Scripta 6:221-228.
20. Dahl, E. 1992. Aspects of malacostracan evolution. - Acta Zoologica 73:339-346.
21. De Jong, L., & B. Casanova. 1997a. Comparative morphology of the foregut of three Eucopia species (Crustacea, Mysidacea, Lophogastrida). - Journal of Natural History 31:389-402.
22. De Jong, L., & B. Casanova. 1997b. Comparative morphology of the foregut of four Gnathophausia species (Crustacea, Mysidacea, Lophogastrida). Relationships with other taxa. - Journal of Natural History 31:1029-1140.
23. De Jong-Moreau, L., & B. Casanova. 2001. The foreguts of the primitive families of the Mysida. (Crustacea, Peracarida): a transitional link between those of the Lophogastrida. (Crustacea, Mysidacea) and the most evolved Mysida. - Acta Zoologica 82:137-147.
24. De Jong-Moreau, L., M. Brunet, J.-P. Casanova, & J. Mazza. 2000. Comparative structure and ultrastructure of the midgut and hepatopancreas of five species of Mysidacea (Crustacea): functional implications. - Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:822-834.
25. Dohle, W., & G. Scholtz. 1997. How far does cell lineage influence cell fate specification in crustacean embryos? - Cell & Developmental Biology 8:379-390.
26. Dreyer, H., & J. W. Wägele. 2001. Parasites of crustaceans (Isopoda: Bopyridae) evolved from fish parasites: molecular and morphological evidence. - Zoology 103:157-178.
27. Dreyer, H., & J. W. Wägele. 2002. The Scutocoxifera tax. nov. and the information content of nuclear SSU rDNA sequences for reconstruction of isopod phylogeny (Peracarida: Isopoda). - Journal of Crustacean Biology 22:217-234.
28. Englisch, U., & S. Koenemann. 2001. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of selected subterranean amphipod crustaceans using small subunit rDNA gene sequences. - Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 1:139-145.
29. Englisch, U., C. O. Coleman, & J. W. Wägele. 2003. First observations on the phylogeny of the families Gammaridae, Crangonyctidae, Melitidae, Niphargidae, Megaluropidae, and Oedicerotidae (Amphipoda, Crustacea) using small subunit rDNA gene sequences. - Journal of Natural History 37:2461-2486.
30. Faith, D. P., & P. S. Cranston. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure. - Cladistics 7:1-28.
31. Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. - Cladistics 5:417-419.
32. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, & C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. - Cladistics 10:315-319.
33. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, & C. Bult. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. - Systematic Biology 44:570-572.
34. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. - Systematic Zoology 40:366-375.
35. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. - Journal of Molecular Evolution 17:368-376.
36. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. - Evolution 39:783-791.
37. France, S. C., & T. D. Kocher. 1996a. Geographic and bathymetric patterns of mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence divergence among deep-sea amphipods, Eurythenes gryllus. - Marine Biology 126:633-643.
38. France, S. C., & T. D. Kocher. 1996b. DNA sequencing of formalin-fixed crustaceans from archival research collections. - Molecular Marine Biology and Technology 5:304-313.
39. Fryer, G. 1964. Studies on the functional morphology and feeding mechanism of Monodella argentarii Stella (Crustacea: Thermosbaenacea). - Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 66:49-90.
40. Gerberding, M., & G. Scholtz. 1999. Cell lineage of the midline cells in the amphipod crustacean Orchestia cavimana (Crustacea, Malacostraca) during formation and separation of the germ band. - Development Genes and Evolution 209:91-102.
41. Gerberding, M., & G. Scholtz. 2001. Neurons and glia in the midline of the higher crustacean Orchestia cavimana are generated via an invariant cell lineage that comprises a median neuroblast and glial progenitors. - Developmental Biology 235:397-409.
42. Gerbi, S. A. 1985. Evolution of ribosomal RNA. Pp. 419-517 in R. J. MacIntyre, ed., Molecular evolutionary genetics. Plenum, New York, 632 pp.
43. Gutu, M. 1998. Spelaeogriphacea and Mictacea (partim), suborders of a new order, Cosinzeneacea (Crustacea, Peracarida). - Travaux du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle "Grigore Antipa" 40:121-129.
44. Gutu, M. 2001. Emendations on the description of Thetispelecaris remex Gutu & Iliffe, 1998 and the diagnosis of the order Bochusacea (Crustacea: Peracarida). - Travaux du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle "Grigore Antipa" 43:47-57.
45. Gutu, M., & T. M. Iliffe. 1998. Description of a new hirsutid (n.g., n.sp.) and reassignment of this family from order Mictacea to the new order Bochusacea (Crustacea, Peracarida). - Travaux du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle "Grigore Antipa" 40:93-120.
46. Hancock, J. M., & G. A. Dover. 1988. Molecular coevolution among cryptically simple expansion segments of eukaryotic 26S/28S rRNAs. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 5:377-391.
47. Hancock, J. M., & G. A. Dover. 1990. "Compensatory slippage" in the evolution of ribosomal RNA genes. - Nucleic Acids Research 18:5949-5954.
48. Haye, P. A., I. Kornfield, & L. Watling. 2004. Molecular insights into cumacean family relationships (Crustacea, Cumacea). - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30:798-809.
49. Held, C. 2000. Phylogeny and biogeography of serolid isopods (Crustacea, Isopoda, Serolidae) and the use of ribosomal expansion segments in molecular systematics. - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15:165-178.
50. Hessler, R. R. 1983. A defense of the caridoid facies. Pp. 145-164 in F. R. Schram, ed., Crustacean phylogeny. Crustacean Issues 1. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 372 pp.
51. er, Prince de Monaco 19:1-10.
52. Hillis, D. M., & J. P. Huelsenbeck. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. - Journal of Heredity 83:189-195.
53. Hipp, A. L., J. C. Hall, & K. J. Sytsma. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. - Systematic Biology 53:81-89.
54. Huelsenbeck, J. P., & K. A. Crandall. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. - Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:437-466.
55. Huelsenbeck, J. P., & F. Ronquist. 2002. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Version 3.0b4. - Biometrics 17:754-755.
56. Huelsenbeck, J. P., F. Ronquist & B. Hall. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. - Science 294:2310-2314.
57. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larger, R. E. Miller, & F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inferences of phylogeny. - Systematic Biology 51:673-688.
58. Jarman, S. N., S. Nichol, N. G. Elliott, & A. McMinn. 2000. 28S rDNA evolution in the Eumalacostraca and the phylogenetic position of krill. - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17:26-36.
59. Jukes, T. H., & C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-132 in H. N. Munro, ed., Mammalian protein metabolism, Volume III. Academic Press, New York.
60. Kishino, H., & M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimates of evolutionary tree topologies from sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. - Journal of Molecular Evolution 29:170-179.
61. Kluge, A. G., & J. S. Farris. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. - Systematic Zoology 18:1-32.
62. Knight, A., & D. P. Mindell. 1993. Substitution bias, weighting of DNA sequence evolution, and the phylogenetic position of Fea's viper. - Systematic Biology 42:18-31.
63. Kobusch, W. 1998. The foregut of the Mysida (Crustacea, Peracarida) and its phylogenetic relevance. - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 353:559-581.
64. Kocher, T. D., W. K. Thomas, A. Meyer, S. V. Edwards, S. Pääbo, F. X. Villablanca, & A. C. Wilson. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 86:6196-6200.
65. Lake, J. A. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91:1455-1459.
66. Lanave, C., G. Preparata, C. Saccon, & G. Serio. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. - Journal of Molecular Evolution 20:86-93.
67. Larget, B., & D. L. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 16:750-759.
68. Larsen, K. 2001. Morphological and molecular investigation of polymorphism and cryptic species in tanaid crustaceans: implications for tanaid systematics and biodiversity estimates. - Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 131:353-379.
69. Lörz, A.-N., & C. Held. 2004. A preliminary molecular and morphological phylogeny of the Antarctic Epimeriidae and Iphimediidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda). - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31:4-15.
70. Lockhart, P. J., M. A. Steel, M. D. Hendy, & D. Penny. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 11:605-612.
71. Martin, J. W., & G. E. Davis. 2001. An updated classification of the recent Crustacea. - Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series 39:1-124.
72. Mattern, D., & M. Schlegel. 2001. Molecular evolution of the small subunit ribosomal DNA in woodlice (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea) and implications for oniscidean phylogeny. - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18:54-65.
73. Meland, K. 2003. Phylogeny, evolution, and biogeography of the mysid genus Pseudomma (Crustacea, Peracarida, Mysidacea), including a phylogenetic analysis of the order Mysidacca. University of Bergen, Norway. Dr. scient. thesis. ISBN 82-7744-101-0.
74. Meland, K., & E. Willassen. 2004. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Pseudomma (Peracarida: Mysida). - Journal of Crustacean Biology 24:541-557.
75. Michel-Salzat, A., & D. Bouchon. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial LSU rRNA in oniscids. - Comptes Rendues de l'Académie des Sciences. La Vie des Sciences 323:827-837.
76. Monod, T. 1924. Sur un type nouveau de Malacostrace: Thermosbaena mirabilis nov. gen. nov. sp. - Bulletin du Société Zoologique de France 49:58-68.
77. Nyland, A., S. Økland, & A. Tjønneland. 1987. The crustacean heart ultrastructure and its bearing upon the position of the isopods in eumalacostracan phylogeny. - Zoologica Scripta 16:235-241.
78. Oakley, T. H., & C. W. Cunningham. 2002. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the independent evolutionary origin of an arthropod compound eye. - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:1426-1430.
79. Oshel, P. E., & D. H. Steele. 1988. SEM morphology of the foreguts of gammaridean amphipods compared to Anaspides tasmaniae (Anaspidacea: Anaspididae), Gnathophausia ingens (Mysidacea: Lophogastridae), and Idotea balthica (Isopoda: Idoteidae). - Crustaceana 13:209-219.
80. Panganiban, G., A. Sebring, L. Nagy, & S. Carroll. 1995. The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods. - Science 270:1363-1366.
81. Pires, A. M. S. 1987. Potiicoara brasiliensis: a new genus and species of Spelaeogriphacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Brazil with a phylogenetic analysis of the Peracarida. - Journal of Natural History 21:225-238.
82. Poore, G. C. B., & W. F. Humphreys. 2003. Second species of Mangkurtu (Spelaeogriphacea) from north-western Australia. - Records of the Western Autralian Museum 22:67-74.
83. Posada, D., & K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. - Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
84. Rannala, B., & Z. Yang. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. - Journal of Molecular Evolution 43:304-311.
85. Richter, S., & G. Scholtz. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of the Malacostraca (Crustacea). - Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 39:113-136.
86. Richter, S., G. D. Edgecombe, & G. D. F. Wilson. 2002. The lacinia mobilis and similar structures - a valuable character in arthropod phylogenetics? - Zoologischer Anzeiger 241:339-361.
87. Rodriguez, F., J. F. Oliver, A. Marin, & J. R. Medina. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. - Journal of Theoretical Biology 142:485-501.
88. Saiki, R., D. H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel, S. J. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G. T. Horn, K. B. Mullis, & H. A. Erlich. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. - Science 239:487-491.
89. Saitou, N., & M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 4:406-425.
90. Scholtz, G. 1995. Head segmentation in Crustacea - an immnunological study. - Zoology, Analysis of Complex Systems 98:104-114.
91. Scholtz, G. 2000. Evolution of the nauplius stage in malacostracan crustaceans. - Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 38:175-187.
92. Scholtz, G., W. Dohle, R. E. Sandeman, & S. Richter. 1993. Expression of engrailed can be lost and regained in cells of one clone in crustacean embryos. - International Journal of Developmental Biology 37:299-304.
93. Scholtz, G., N. H. Patel, & W. Dohle. 1994. Serially homologous engrailed stripes are generated via different cell lineages in the germ band of amphipod crustaceans (Malacostraca, Peracarida). - International Journal of Developmental Biology 38:471-478.
94. Schram, F. R. 1982. The fossil record and evolution of Crustacea. Pp. 93-147 in D.E. Bliss, ed.-inchief, The biology of Crustacea. Vol. 1. L. G. Abele, ed., Systematics, the fossil record, and biogeography. Academic Press, New York, 319 pp.
95. Schram, F. R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, New York, 606 pp.
96. Schram, F. R., & C. H. J. Hof. 1998. Fossils and the interrelationships of major crustacean groups. Pp. 233-302 in G. D. Edgecombe, ed., Arthropod fossils and phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, 347 pp.
97. Schram, F. R., & S. Koenemann. 2004. Developmental genetics and arthropod evolution: on body regions of Crustacea. Pp. 75-92 in G. Scholtz, ed., Evolutionary developmental biology of Crustacea. Crustacean Issues Volume 15. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 220 pp.
98. Shen, Y. B., R. S. Taylor, & F. R. Schram. 1998. A new spelaeogriphacean (Crustacea: Peracarida) from the Upper Jurassic of China. - Contributions to Zoology 68:19-35.
99. Sherbakov, D. Y., R. M. Kamaltynov, O. B. Ogarkov, R. Vainola, J. K. Vainio, & E. Verheyen. 1999. On the phylogeny of Lake Baikal amphipods in the light of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence data. - Crustaceana 72:911-919.
100. Shimodaira, H., & M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 16:1114-1116.
101. Siewing, R. 1953. Morphologische untersuchungen an Tanaidaceen und Lophogastriden. - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 157:333-426.
102. Siewing, R. 1958. Anatomie und histologie von Thermosbaena mirabilis: ein beitrag zur phylogenie der Reihe Pancarida (Thermosbaenacea). Akademie der Wissenschaften und Litteiratur. - Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 7:198-270.
103. Siewing, R. 1963. Studies in malacostracan morphology: results and problems. Pp. 85-103 in H. B. Whittington & W. D. I. Rolfe, eds., Phylogeny and evolution of Crustacea. Museum of Comparative Zoology Special Publication, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 192 pp.
104. Spears, T., & L. G. Abele. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of crustaceans with foliaceous limbs: an 18S rDNA study of Branchiopoda, Cephalocarida, and Phyllocarida. - Journal of Crustacean Biology 19:825-843.
105. Spears, T., & L. G. Abele. 2000. Branchiopod monophyly and interordinal phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal RNA. - Journal of Crustacean Biology 20:1-24.
106. Storch, V. 1987. Microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the stomach of Porcellio scaber (Crustacea, Isopoda). - Zoomorphology 106:301-311.
107. Storch, V. 1989. Scanning and transmission electron microscope observations on the stomach of three mysid species (Crustacca). - Journal of Morphology 200:17-27.
108. Sub, H.-L. 1990. Morphology of the gastric mill of the genus Thysanopoda (Euphausiacea). - Journal of Crustacean Biology 10:479-486.
109. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
110. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Wadell, & D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407-514 in D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, & B. K. Mable, eds., Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 655 pp.
111. Tautz, D., J. M. Hancock, D. A. Webb, C. Tautz, & G. A. Dover. 1988. Complete sequences of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 5:366-376.
112. Tavare, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. - Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 17:57-86.
113. Templeton, A. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. - Evolution 37:221-244.
114. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, & T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. - Nucleic Acids Research 22:4673-4680.
115. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, & D. G. Higgins. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. - Nucleic Acids Research 24:4876-4882.
116. Ulrich, B., V. Storch, & H. P. Marschall. 1991. Microscopic anatomy, functional morphology, and ultratructure of the stomach of Euphausia superba Dana (Crustacea, Euphausiacea). - Polar Biology 11:203-211.
117. Van de Peer, Y., J. Jansen, P. De Rijk, & R. De Wachter. 1997. Database on the structure of small subunit ribosomal RNA. - Nucleic Acids Research 25:111-116.
118. Vonk, R., & F. R. Schram. 2003. Ingolfiellidea (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Amphipoda): a phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis. - Contributions to Zoology 72:39-72.
119. Wagner, H. P. 1994. A monographic review of the Thermosbaenacea (Crustacea: Peracarida). - Zoologische Verhandelingen 291:1-338.
120. Wallis, E. J., & D. L. Macmillan. 1998. Foregut morphology and feeding strategies in the syncarid malacostracan Anaspides tasmaniae: correlating structure and function. - Journal of Crustacean Biology 18:279-289.
121. Watling, L. 1981. An alternative phylogeny of peracarid crustaceans. - Journal of Crustacean Biology 1:201-210.
122. Watling, L. 1983. Peracaridan disunity and its bearing on eumalacostracan phylogeny with a redefinition of eumalacostracan superorders. Pp. 213-228 in F. R. Schram ed., Crustacean phylogeny. Crustacean Issues 1. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 372 pp.
123. Watling, L. 1999. Towards understanding the relationship of the peracaridan orders: the necessity of determining exact homologies. Pp. 73-89 in F. R. Schram & J. C. von Vaupel Klein, eds., Crustaceans and the Biodiversity Crisis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Crustacean Congress, Amsterdam: The Netherlands, July 2024, 1998, Vol. I. Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1021 pp.
124. Watling, L., C. H. J. Hof, & F. R. Schram. 2000. The place of the Hoplocarida in the malacostracan pantheon. - Journal of Crustacean Biology 20:1-11.
125. Wetzer, R. 2002. Mitochondrial genes and isopod phylogeny (Peracarida: Isopoda). - Journal of Crustacean Biology 22:1-14.
126. Wheeler, W. C. 1998. Sampling, groundplans, total evidence and the systematics of arthropods. Pp. 87-96 in R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas, eds., Arthropod relationships. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series 55, Chapman and Hall, London, 383 pp.
127. Wills, M. A. 1998. A phylogeny of recent and fossil Crustacea derived from morphological characters. Pp. 189-209 in R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas, eds., Arthropod relationships. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series 55, Chapman and Hall, London, 383 pp.
128. Yang, Z., N. Goldman, & A. Friday. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 11:316-324.