Towards structural models of molecular recognition in olfactory receptors

Biochimie

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 129-135

  Afshar, M ^a,b   Hubbard, R E ^b   Demaille, J ^a  

^a Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

G protein coupled receptor; Molecular docking; Molecular modelling; Olfaction; Protein ligand interaction

Indexed keywords

GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; RECEPTOR PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; RECEPTOR BINDING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SMELLING; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 18344398255     PISSN: 03009084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-9084(98)80019-9     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. 1 Shepherd GM (1994) Discrimination of molecular signals by the olfactory receptor neuron. Neuron 13, 771-790
2. 2 Firestein (1996) Olfaction: scents and sensibility. Curr Biol 6, 666-667
3. 3 Sowadski JM (1994) Crystallization of membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 4, 761-764
4. 4 Schertler GFX, Villa C, Henderson R (1993) Projection structure of rhodopsin. Nature 362, 770-72
5. 5 Schertler GFX, Hargrave A (1995) Projection structure of frog rhodopsin in two crystal forms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 11578-11582
6. 6 Grigorieff N, Ceska TA, Downing KH, Baldwin JM, Henderson R (1996) Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol 259, 393-421
7. 7 Donnelly D, Findlay JBC (1994) Seven-helix receptors: structure and modelling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 4, 582-589
8. 8 Hibert MF, Trumpp-Kallmeyer S, Bruinvels A, Hoflack J (1991) Three-dimensional models of neurotransmitter G protein coupled receptors. Mol Pharmacol 40, 8-15
9. 9 Soppa J (1994) Two hypotheses-one answer. Sequence comparison does not support an evolutionary link between halobacterial retinal proteins including bacteriorhodopsin and eukaryotic G-protein coupled receptors. FEBS Lett 342, 7-11
10. 10 Unger VM, Schertler GFX (1995) Low resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin determined by electron cryo-microscopy. Biophys J 68, 1776-1786
11. 11 Schertler GFX, Hargrave A (1995) Projection structure of frog rhodopsin in two crystal forms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 11578-11582
12. 12 Alkorta I, Du P (1994) Sequence divergence analysis for the prediction of seven-helix membrane protein structures: II. A 3-D model of human rhodopsin. Protein Eng 7, 1231-1238
13. 13 Taylor WR, Jones DT, Green NM (1994) A method for a-helical integral membrane protein fold prediction. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 18, 281-294
14. 14 Donnelly D, Overington JP, Ruffle SV, Nugent JHA, Blundell TL (1993) Modelling a-helical transmembrane domains: the calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid facing residues. Protein Sci 2, 55-70
15. 15 Baldwin J (1993) The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors. EMBO J 12, 1693-1703
16. 16 Tuffery P, Etchebest C, Popot JL, Lavery R (1994) Prediction of the positioning of the seven transmembrane α-helices of bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol 236, 1105-1122
17. 17 Pogozheva ID, Lomize AL, Mosberg HI (1997) The transmembrane 7-a-bundle of rhopsin: distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. Biophys J 70, 1963-1985
18. 18 Herzyk P, Hubbard RE (1995) Automated method for modelling seven-helix transmembrane receptors from experimental data. Biophys J 69, 2419-2442
19. 19 Du P, Salon JA, Tamm JA, Hou CF, Cui WL, Walker MW, Adham N, Dhanoa DS, Islam I, Vaysse PJJ, Dowling B, Shifman Y, Boyle N, Rueger H, Schmidlin T, Yamaguchi Y, Branchek TA, Weinshank RL, Gluchowski C (1997) Modeling the G-protein-coupled neuropeptide YY1 receptor agonist and antagonsit binding sites. Prot Eng 10, 109-117
20. 20 Lengauer T, Rarey M (1996) Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6, 402-406
21. 21 Miyamoto S, Kollman PA (1993) Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches. Proteins 16, 226-245
22. 22 Pettitt BM, Karplus M (1986) Interaction energies: their role in drug design. In: Molecular graphics and drug design (Burgen ASV, Roberts GCK, Tute MS, eds) Elsevier, Oxford, 76-113
23. 23 Meng EC, Stoichet BK, Kuntz ID (1992) Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J Comput Chem 13, 505-524
24. 24 Weiner PK, Kollman PA (1981) AMBER - Assisted model-building with energy refinement - a general program for modeling molecules and their interactions. J Comput Chem 2, 287-303
25. 25 Zheng Q, Kyle DJ (1994) Multiple copy sampling - rigid versus flexible samplings. Proteins 19, 324-329
26. 26 Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swanimathan S, Karplus M (1983) CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4, 187-217
27. 27 Janin J (1996) Elusive affinities. Proteins 25, 438-445
28. 28 Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD (1986) Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 319, 199-203
29. 29 Juffer AH, Eisenhaber F, Hubbard SJ, Walther D, Argos P (1995) Comparison of atomic solvation parametric sets: applicability and limitations in protein folding and binding. Protein Sci 4, 2499-2509
30. 30 Cummings MD, Hart TN, Read RJ (1995) Atomic solvation parameters in the analysis of protein-protein docking results. Protein Sci 4, 2087-2099
31. 31 Lee KH, Xie D, Freire E, Amzel LM (1994) Estimation of changes in side chain configurational entropy in binding and folding: general methods and application to helix formation. Proteins 20, 68-84
32. 32 Bohm HJ (1994) The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Design 8, 243-256
33. 33 Bohm HJ (1994) On the use of Ludi to search the fine chemicals directory for ligands of proteins of known 3 dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Design 8, 623-632
34. 34 Welch W, Ruppert J, Jain A (1996) Hamerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Curr Biol 3, 449-462
35. 35 Jain A (1996) Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: a continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities. J Comput Aided Mol Design 10, 427-440
36. 36 Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G (1996) A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 261, 470-489
37. 37 Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE (1982) A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 161, 269-288
38. 38 Rarey M, Wefing S, Lengauer T (1996) Placement of medium-sized molecular fragments into active sites of proteins. J Comput Aided Mol Design 10, 41-54
39. 39 Li Z, Chen X, Davidson E, Zwang O, Mendis C, Ring CS, Roush WR, Fegley G, Li R, Rosenthal PJ, Lee GK et al (1994) Anti-malarial drug development using models of enzyme structure. Chem Biol 1, 31-37
40. 40 Rosenfeld R, Vajda S, DeLisi C (1995) Flexible docking and design. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 24, 677-700
41. 41 Sezerman U, Vajda S, Cornette J, DeLisi C (1993) Towards computational determination of peptide-receptor structure. Protein Sci 2, 1827-1843
42. 42 Luty BA, Wasserman ZR, Stouten PFW, Hodge CN, Zacharias M, McCammon JA (1995 ) A molecular mechanics/grid method for evaluation of ligand-receptor interactions. J Comput Chem 16, 454-464.
43. 43 Caflish A, Fischer S, Karplus M (1996) Docking by Monte Carlo minimisation with solvation correction: application to an FKBP-substrate complex. J Comput Chem 18, 723-743
44. 44 Oshiro CM, Kuntz ID, Dixon JS (1995) Flexible ligand docking using a genetic algorithm. J Comput Aided Mol Design 9, 113-130
45. 45 Clark DE, Westhead DR (1996) Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design. J Comput Aided Mol Design 10, 337-358
46. 46 Desmet J, Wilson IA, Joniau M, deMaeyer M, Lusters I (1997) Computation of the binding of fully flexible peptides to proteins with flexible side chains. FASEB J 11, 164-172
47. 47 Mata P, Gillet VJ, Johnson AP, Lampreia J, Myatt GJ, Sike S, Stebbings AL (1995) SPROUT-3D structure generation using templates. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 35, 479-493
48. 48 Bohacek RS, McMartin C (1994) Multiple highly diverse structures complementary to enzyme binding sites - results of extensive application of a de novo design method incorporating combinatorial growth. J Am Chem Soc 116, 5560-5571
49. 49 Caflisch A (1996) Computational combinatorial ligand design: application to human α-thrombin. J Comput Aided Mol Design 10, 372-396
50. 50 Eisen MB, Wiley DC, Karplus M, Hubbard RE (1994) HOOK - A program for finding novel molecular architectures that satisfy the chemical and steric requirements of a macromolecule binding-site. Proteins 19, 199-221
51. 51 Miranker A, Karplus M (1991 ) Functionality maps of binding sites: a multicopy simultaneous search method. Proteins 11, 29-34
52. 52 Grootenhuis PDJ, Karplus M (1996) Functionality map analysis of the cative site cleft of human thrombin. J Comput Aided Mol Design 10, 1-10
53. 53 Caflish A, Miranker A, Karplus M (1993) Multiple copy simultaneous search and construction of ligands in binding sites: Application to inhibitors of HIV-1 aspartic proteinase. J Med Chem 36, 2142-2164
54. 54 Joseph-McCarthy D, Hogle JM and Karplus M (1997) Use of multiple copy simultaneous search (MCSS) method to design a new class of picornavirus capsid binding drugs. Proteins 29, 32-58
55. 55 Lancet D, Ben-Arie N (1993) Olfactory receptors. Curr Biol 3, 668-674
56. 56 Raming K, Krieger J, Strotmann J, Boekhoff I, Kubick S, Baumstark C and Breer H (1993) Cloning and expression of odorant receptors. Nature 361, 353-356
57. 57 Kiefer H, Krieger J, Olszewski JD, von Heijne G, Prestwich GD, Breer H (1996) Expression of an olfactory receptor in Escherichia coli: purification, reconstitution, and ligand binding. Biochemistry 35, 16077-16084
58. 58 Theimer ET (1982) Fragrance chemistry. Academic Press, San Diego
59. 59 Sander C, Schneider R (1991) Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9, 56-68
60. 60 Tufféry P, Etchebest C, Hazout S, Lavery R (1991) A new approach to the rapid determination of protein side chain conformations; J Biomol Struct Dyn 8, 1267-1289
61. 61 Unger VM, Margrave PA, Baldwin JM, GFX Schertler (1997) Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices. Nature 389, 203-206
62. 62 Bourne HR (1997) How receptors talk to trimeric G proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9, 134-142