Computational methods for biomolecular docking

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 402-406

  Lengauer, Thomas ^a   Rarey, Matthias ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; ENERGY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0029902763     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80061-3     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Lin LS, Nussinov R, Fischer D, Wolfson H: Molecular surface representation by sparse critical points. Proteins 1994, 18:94-101.
2. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HL, Nussinov R: Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed sparse points in docking. J Mol Biol 1995, 252:263-273.
3. Vakser IA, Aflalo C: Hydrophobic docking: a proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques. Proteins 1994, 20:320-329.
4. Ackermann F, Herrmann G, Kummert F, Posch S, Sagerer G, Schomburg D: Protein docking combining symbolic descriptions of molecular surfaces and grid-based scoring functions. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press; 1995:3-11.
5. Jiang F, Kim S: Soft docking: matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 1991, 219:79-102.
6. Walls PH, Sternberg MJE: New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. J Mol Biol 1992, 228:277-297.
7. Helmer-Citterich M, Tramontano A: PUZZLE: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. J Mol Biol 1994, 235:1021-1031.
8. Duncan BS, Olson AJ: Predicting protein-protein interactions using parametric surfaces. In Proceedings of the 13th Molecular Graphics Society Meeting: Evanston, IL New York: Elsevier; 1994:in press.
9. Shoichet BK, Bodian DL, Kuntz ID: Molecular docking using shape descriptors. J Comput Chem 1992, 13:380-397.
10. Fischer D, Lin SL, Wolfson HL, Nussinov R: A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J Mol Biol 1995, 248:459-477.
11. Lenhof H-P: An algorithm for the protein docking problem. In Bioinformatics: From Nucleic Acids and Proteins to Cell Metabolism. Edited by Schomburg D, Lessel U. Weinheim: VCH; 1995:125-139.
12. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA: Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:2195-2199.
13. Vakser IA: Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng 1995, 8:371-377.
14. Totrov M, Abagyan R: Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy. Nat Struct Biol 1994, 1:259-263.
15. Abagyan R, Totrov M: Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J Mol Biol 1994, 235:983-1002.
16. Halgren TA: Potential energy functions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5:205-210.
17. Miller MD, Kearsley SK, Underwood DJ, Sheridan RP: FLOG: a system to select 'quasi-flexible' ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:153-174.
18. Kearsley SK, Underwood DJ, Sheridan RP, Miller MD: Flexibases: a way to enhance the use of molecular docking methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:565-582.
19. Klebe G, Mietzner T: A fast and efficient method to generate biologically relevant conformations. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:583-606.
20. Böhm HJ: The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:243-256.
21. Leach AR, Kuntz ID: Conformational analysis of flexible ligands in macromolecular receptor sites. J Comput Chem 1992, 13:730-748.
22. Mizutani MY, Tomioka N, Itai A: Rational automatic search method for stable docking models of protein and ligand. J Mol Biol 1994, 243:310-326.
23. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T: Time-efficient docking of flexible ligands into active sites of proteins. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology. Edited by Rawlings C, Clark D, Altman R, Hunter L, Lengauer T, Wodak S. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press; 1995:300-308.
24. Sandak B, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ: An automated computer vision and robotics-based technique for 3-D flexible biomolecular docking and matching. Comput Appl Biosci 1995, 11:87-99.
25. Clark KP, Ajay: Flexible ligand docking without parameter adjustment across four ligand-receptor complexes. J Comput Chem 1995, 16:1210-1226.
26. Oshiro CM, Kuntz ID, Dixon JS: Flexible ligand docking using a genetic algorithm. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1995, 9:113-130.
27. Jones G, Willet P, Glen RC: Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J Mol Biol 1995, 245:43-53.
28. Gelhaar DK, Verkhivker G, Rejto PA, Fogel DB, Fogel U, Freer ST: Docking conformationally flexible small molecules into a protein binding site through evolutionary programming. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming. Edited by McDonnell JR, Reynolds RG, Fogel DB. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995:615-627.
29. Koshland DE Jr: The joys and vicissitudes of protein science. Protein Sci 1993, 2:1364-1368.
30. Leach AR: Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. J Mol Biol 1994, 235:345-356.
31. Di Nola A, Roccatano D, Berendsen HJC: Molecular dynamics simulation of the docking of substrates to proteins. Proteins 1994, 19:174-182.
32. Luty BA, Wasserman ZR, Stouten PFW, Hodge CN, Zacharias M, McCammon JA: A molecular mechanics/grid method for evaluation of ligand-receptor interactions. J Comput Chem 1995, 16:454-464.
33. Poornima CS, Dean PM: Hydration in drug design. 1. Multiple hydrogen-bonding features of water molecules in mediating protein-ligand interactions. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1995, 9:500-512.
34. Wlodawer A: Rational drug design: the proteinase inhibitors. Pharmacotherapy 1994, 14(suppl2):9-20.
35. Knetgel RMA, Antoon J, Rullmann C, Boelens R, Kaptein R: MONTY: a Monte Carlo approach to protein-DNA recognition. J Mol Biol 1994, 235:318-324.
36. Knetgel RMA, Boelens R, Kaptein R: Monte Carlo docking of protein-DNA complexes: incorporation of DNA flexibility and experimental data. Protein Eng 1994, 7:761-767.
37. Grootenhuis PDJ, Roe DC, Kollman PA, Kuntz ID: Finding potential DNA-binding compounds by using molecular shape. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:731-750.
38. Prabhakar P, Kayastha AM: Mechanism of DNA-drug interactions. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1994, 47:39-55.
39. Kubinyi H: QSAR: Hansch analysis and related approaches. Weinheim: VCH; 1993. [Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry, vol 1.]
40. Kubinyi H: 3D QSAR in Drug Design. Theory, Methods and Applications. Leiden: ESCOM Science Publishers; 1993.
41. Lewis RA, Leach A: Current methods for site-directed structure generation. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:467-475.
42. Colman PM: Structure-based drug design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994, 4:868-874.
43. Guida WC: Software for structure-based drug design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994, 4:777-781.
44. Kuntz ID, Meng EC, Shoichet BK: Structure-based molecular design. Accounts Chem Res 1994, 27:117-123.
45. Houghton RA: Combinatorial Libraries: the Theory and Practice of Combinatorial Chemistry. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. Leiden: ESCOM Science Publishers BV; 1995.
46. Beaudry AA, Joyce GF: Directed evolution of an RNA enzyme. Science 1992, 257:635-641.