SH2 binding site comparison: A new application of the SURFCOMP method

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 414-421

  Hofbauer, Christian ^a   Aszódi, András ^a  

^a Novartis Institutes Biomed Res V   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; CONFORMATIONS; DRUG PRODUCTS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEINS;

BINDING SITES; LIGANDS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VALINE CAVITIES;

CHEMICAL BONDS;

LIGAND; PROTEIN; THREONINE; VALINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HYDROGEN BOND; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HYDROGEN BONDING; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; THREONINE; VALINE;

EID: 18344364321     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0497049     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Hofbauer, C.; Lohninger, H.; Aszódi, A. SURFCOMP: a novel graph-based approach to molecular surface comparison. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 2004, 44, 837-847.
2. Botfield, M. C.; Green, J. SH2 and SH3 domains: choreographers of multiple signaling pathways. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 1995, 30, 227-237.
3. Latour, S.; Roncagalli, R.; Chen, R.; Bakinowski, M.; Shi, X.; Schwartzberg, P. L.; Davidson, D.; Veillette, A. Binding of SAP SH2 domain to FynT SH3 domain reveals a novel mechanism of receptor signalling in immune regulation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5, 149-154.
4. Chan, B.; Lanyi, A.; Song, H. K.; Griesbach, J.; Simarro-Grande, M.; Poy, F.; Howie, D.; Sumegi, J.; Terhorst, C.; Eck, M. J. SAP couples Fyn to SLAM immune receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5, 155-160.
5. Morra, M.; Howie, D.; Grande, M. S.; Sayos, J.; Wang, N.; Wu, C.; Engel, P.; Terhorst, C. X-linked lymphoproliferative disease: a progressive immunodeficiency. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2001, 19, 657-682.
6. Morra, M. Structural basis for the interaction of the free SH2 domain EAT-2 with SLAM receptors in hematopoietic cells. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 5840.
7. Li, C.; Iosef, C.; Jia, C. Y.; Han, V. K.; Li, S. S. Dual functional roles for the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome gene product SAP/SH2D1A in signaling through the signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) family of immune receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 3852-3859.
8. Li, S. C.; Gish, G.; Yang, D.; Coffey, A. J.; Forman-Kay, J. D.; Ernberg, I.; Kay, L. E.; Pawson, T. Novel mode of ligand binding by the SH2 domain of the human XLP disease gene product SAP/ SH2D1A. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 1355-1362.
9. Kleywegt, J. Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 1887.
10. Kauvar, M. Deciphering cryptic similarities in protein binding sites. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1998, 9, 390.
11. Jambon, M. A new bioinformatic approach to detect common 3D sites in protein structures. Proteins 2003, 52, 137.
12. Bostick, D. A new topological method to measure protein structure similarity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 304, 320.
13. Maggiora, M. Comparing protein structures: a Gaussian-based approach to the three-dimensional structural similarity of proteins. J. Mol. Graphics 2001, 19, 168.
14. Lee, B.; Richards, F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 1971, 55, 379-400.
15. Connolly, M. L. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1983, 16, 548-558.
16. Via, A.; Ferrè, F.; Brannetti, B.; Helmer-Citterich, M. Protein surface similarities: a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000, 57, 1970-1977.
17. Lin, S. L.; Nussinov, R.; Fischer, D.; Wolfson, H. J. Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points. Proteins: Struct. Fund. Genet. 1994, 18, 94-101.
18. Fischer, D.; Lin, S. L.; Wolfson, H. L.; Nussinov, R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 248, 459-477.
19. Goldman, B. B.; Wipke, W. T. QSD quadratic shape descriptors. 2. Molecular docking using quadratic shape descriptors (QSDock). Proteins: Struct. Fund. Genet. 2000, 38, 79-94.
20. Wang, H. Grid-search molecular accessible surface algorithm for solving the protein docking problem. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 746-750.
21. Connolly, M. L. Shape distributions of protein topography. Biopolymers 1992, 32, 1215-1236.
22. Chau, P. L.; Dean, P. M. Molecular recognition: 3D surface structure comparison by gnomic projection. J. Mol. Graphics 1987, 5, 97-100.
23. Bladon, P. A rapid method for comparing and matching the spherical parameter surfaces of molecules and other irregular objects. J. Mol. Graphics 1989, 7, 130-137.
24. Blaney, F.; Flinn, P.; Phippen, R.; Wyatt, R. Molecular surface comparison: application to drug design. J. Mol. Graphics 1993, 11, 98-105.
25. Leicester, S. E.; Finney, J. L.; Bywater, R. P. Description of molecular surface shape using Fourier descriptors. J. Mol. Graphics 1988, 6, 104-8, 100.
26. Ritchie, D. W. A. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 2000, 39, 178-194.
27. Cosgrove, D.; Bayada, D.; Johnson, A. A novel method of aligning molecules by local surface shape similarity. J. Comput.- Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 573-591.
28. Goldman, B. B.; Wipke, W. T. Quadratic shape descriptors. 1. Rapid superposition of dissimilar molecules using geometrically invariant surface descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 2000, 40, 644-658.
29. Exner, T. E.; Keil, M.; Brickmann, J. Pattern recognition strategies for molecular surfaces. I. Pattern generation using fuzzy set theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1176-1187.
30. Martin, Y. C.; Bures, M. G.; Danaher, E. A.; DeLazzer, J.; Lico, I.; Pavlik, P. A. A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 83-102.
31. Zhang, D.; Herbert, M. Harmonic maps and their applications in surface matching. Presented at the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '99) 1999,
32. Wang, R.; Wang, S. How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 2001, 41, 1422.
33. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
34. Brickmann, J.; Goetze, T.;, Heiden, W.; Moeckel, G.; Reiling, S.; Vollhardt, H.; Zachmann, C. D. Interactive visualization of molecular scenarios with MOLCAD/SYBYL. Data Visualization Mol. Sci. 1995.
35. SYBYL 6.9; Tripos Inc.: St. Louis, MO, 2003.
36. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Gould, I. R.; Mertz, K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197.
37. Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T. Time-efficient flexible superposition of medium-sized molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 357-368.
38. Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 4502.