QSD quadratic shape descriptors. 2. Molecular docking using quadratic shape descriptors (QSDock)

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 79-94

  Goldman, Brian B ^a   Wipke, W Todd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Geometric invariance; Molecular shape comparison; Molecular surface; QSDock; Rigid docking

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; M PROTEIN; RECEPTOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOLIC ACID; LIGANDS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; METHOTREXATE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; TETRAHYDROFOLATE DEHYDROGENASE; WATER;

EID: 0033980458     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000101)38:1<79::AID-PROT9>3.0.CO;2-U     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 1982;161:269-288.
2. Shoichet BK, Bodian DL, Kuntz ID. Molecular docking using shape descriptors. J Comput Chem 1992;13:380-397.
3. Goodford PJ. Drug design by the method of receptor fit. J Med Chem 1984;27:557-564.
4. Bacon DJ, Moult J. Docking by least-squares fitting of molecular surface patterns. J Mol Biol 1992;225:849-858.
5. Jiang F, Kim SH. Soft docking: matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 1991;219:79-102.
6. Norel R, Fischer D, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Molecular surface recognition by a computer vision-based technique. Protein Eng 1994;7:39-46.
7. 1 subunit interface. Biopolymers 1986;25:1229-1247.
8. Andrew SS, Crippen GM, Richards WG. Fast drug-receptor mapping by site-directed distances: a novel method of predicting new pharmacological leads. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1991;31:386-392.
9. Lawrence MC, Davis PC. Clix: a search algorithm for finding novel ligands capable of binding proteins of known three-dimensional structure. Proteins 1992;12:3-41.
10. Kasinos N, Lilley GA, Subbarao N, Haneef I. A robust and efficient automated docking algorithm for molecular recognition. Protein Eng 1992;5:69-75.
11. Bohm H-J. On the use of LUDI to search the fine chemical directory for ligands of proteins of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 1994;8:623-632.
12. Rarey M, Wefing S, Lengauer T. Placement of medium-sized molecular fragments into active sites of proteins. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 1996;10:41-54.
13. Helmer-Citterich M, Tramontano A. PUZZLE: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1021-1031.
14. Sobolev V, Wade RC, Vriend G, Edelman M. Molecular docking using surface complementarity. Proteins 1996;25:120-129.
15. Perkins TDH, Mills JEJ, Dean PM. Molecular surface-volume and property matching to superpose flexible dissimilar molecules. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 1995;9:479-490.
16. Masek BB, Merchant A, Matthews JB. Molecular skins: a new concept for quantitative shape matching of a protein with its small molecule mimics. Proteins 1993;17:193-202.
17. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vaker IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
18. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC. A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 1995;9:532-549.
19. Verkhivker GM, Rejto PA, Gehlhaar DK, Freer ST. Exploring the energy landscape of molecular recognition by a genetic algorithm -analysis of the requirements for robust docking of HIV-1 protease and FKRP-12 complexes. Proteins 1996;25:342-353.
20. Clark KP, Ajay. Flexible ligand docking without parameter adjustment across four ligand-receptor complexes. J Comput Chem 1995;16:1210-1226.
21. Lee RH, Rose GD. Molecular recognition. I. Automatic identification of topographic surface features. Biopolymers 1985;24:1613-1627.
22. Connolly ML. Molecular surface-dot (MS, QCPE 429). QCPE Bull 1981;1:18.
23. Connolly ML. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 1983;221:709-713.
24. Meng CE, Kuntz ID, Abraham DJ, Kellogg GE. Evaluating docked complexes with the hint exponential function and empirical atom hydrophobicities. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 1994;8:299-306.
25. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 1991;221:327-346.
26. Connolly ML. Measurement of protein surface shape by solid angles. J Mol Graphics 1986;4:3-6.
27. Connolly ML. Shape distribution of protein topography. Biopolymers 1992;32:1215-1236.
28. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 1994;34:933-940.
29. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse, points in docking. J Mol Biol 1995;252:263-273.
30. Hahn M. Three-dimensional shape-based searching of conformationally flexible compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1997;37:80-86.
31. Leicester SE, Finney JL, Bywater RP. Description of molecular surface shape using fourier descriptors. J Mol Graphics 1988;6: 104-108.
32. Carson M. Wavelets and molecular structure. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 1998;10:273-283.
33. Nussinov R, Wolfson H. Efficient detection of three dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;6:578-589.
34. Fischer D, Bachar O, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. An efficient automated computer vision based technique for detection of three dimensional structural motifs in proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1992;89:2195-2199.
35. Goldman BB, Wipke WT. QSD quadratic shape descriptors. 1. Rapid superposition of dissimilar molecules using geometrically invariant surface descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:1998. In press.
36. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision. Geometric hashing: a general and efficient model-based recognition scheme. Tampa, Florida, December 1988.
37. Fischer D, Lin SL, Wolfson HL, Nussinov R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J Mol Biol 1995;248:459-477.
38. Rothwell CA. Object recognition through invariant indexing. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1995.
39. Hebert M, Ponce J, Boult T, Gross A, editors. Object representation in computer vision," lecture notes in computer science, International NSF-ARPA Workshop. New York: Springer-Verlag, December 1994.
40. Lin SL, Fischer D, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Molecular surface representation by sparse critical points. Proteins 1994;18:94-101.
41. Zachmann CD, Heiden W, Schlenkrich M, Brickmann J. Topological analysis of complex molecular surfaces. J Comput Chem 1992;13:76-84.
42. Koenderink JJ. Solid shape. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1990. p 195-340.
43. Bohm H-J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 1994;8:243-256.
44. Lawton J, Tudor M, Wipke WT. The basic shape topology of protein interfaces. In: Parrill A, Reddy MR, editors. Rational drug design: novel methodology and practical applications, vol 719; 1999. pp 239-253.
45. Lawton JN, Goldman BB, Wipke WT. QSD quadratic shape descriptors. 6. An information theoretic approach to assessing ligand-receptor shape-complementarity. In preparation.
46. Ward J. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 1963;58:236-244.
47. Mojena R. Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: an evaluation. Computer J 1977;20:359-363.
48. Murtagh F. A survey of recent advances in hierarchical clustering algorithms. Comput J 1983;26:354-359.
49. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, et al. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
50. Korolkovas A. Essentials of molecular pharmacology: background for drug design. New York: John Wiley; 1970.
51. Badger J, Minor I, Kremer MJ, et al. Structural analysis of a series of antiviral agents complexed with human rhinovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:3304-3308.
52. Badger J, Minor I, Oliveira MA, Smith TJ, Rossmann MG. Structural analysis of antiviral agents that interact with the capsid of human rhinoviruses. Proteins 1989;6:1-19.