Feasibility of electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced movement therapy

Physical Therapy

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 428-442

  Fritz, Stacy L ^a,b,c   Chiu, Yi Po ^c   Malcolm, Matthew P ^b,d   Patterson, Tara S ^c   Light, Kathye E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Electrical stimulation; Hemiplegia; Muscle performance

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CASE REPORT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EXTENSOR MUSCLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NEUROMUSCULAR SYSTEM; STIMULATION; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WRIST;

EID: 17844404041     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/85.5.428     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61:281-293.
2. Wolf SL, Lecraw LD, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use in hemiplegic upper extremities to reserve the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104: 125-132.
3. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369-2375.
4. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-628.
5. Blanton S, Wolf S. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847-853.
6. Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-592.
7. Morris D, Crago J, DeLuca S, et al. Constraint-Induced (CI) Movement Therapy for motor recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 1997;9:29-43.
8. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology. 1998;43:152-170.
9. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251.
10. Friel KM, Nudo RJ. Recovery of motor function after focal cortical injury in primates: compensatory movement patterns used during rehabilitative training. Somatosens Mot Res. 1998;15:173-189.
11. Friel KM, Heddings AA, Nudo RJ. Effects of postlesion experience on behavioral recovery and neurophysiologic reorganization after cortical injury in primates. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2000; 14:187-198.
12. Liepert J, Miltner W, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5-8.
13. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210-1216.
14. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791-1794.
15. Liepert J, Uhde I, Graf S, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol. 2001;248:315-321.
16. Fields RW. Electromyographically triggered electric muscle stimulation for chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:407-414.
17. Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:570-575.
18. Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:220-227.
19. Cauraugh J, Light K, Kim S, et al. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke. 2000;31:1360-1364.
20. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Wagenaar R. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 1999;13:457-470.
21. Schuling J, de Haan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index, assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24:1173-1177.
22. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, et al. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993;73:447-454.
23. Duncan P, Wallace D, Lai S, et al. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131-2140.
24. Taub E, Miller N, Novack T, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-354.
25. Taub E, Wolf S. Constraint-induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics in Rehabilitation. 1997;3(4):38-61.
26. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39:386-391.
27. Lamontagne A, Richards CL, Malouin F. Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behavior after stroke. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10: 407-415.
28. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain, Nature. 2000;406(6792):147-150.
29. Brasil-Neto JP, McShane LM, Fuhr P, et al. Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 85:9-16.
30. Wassermann EM, McShane LM, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:1-8.
31. Wolf S, Lecraw D, Barton L. Forced use in hemiplegic upper extremities to reserve the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-132.
32. Taub E, Morris D. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001;3:279-286.
33. Lundy-Ekman L. Neuroscience: Fundamentals for Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2002.
34. Sheehan G. Neurophysiology of spasticity. In: Barnes MP, Johnson GR, eds. Upper Motor Neurone Syndrome and Spasticity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2000:12-78.
35. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 3rd ed. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Inc; 1999:285-322.
36. Pascual-Leone A, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, et al. Differentiation of sensorimotor neuronal structures responsible for induction of motor evoked potentials, attenuation in detection of somatosensory stimuli, and induction of sensation of movement by mapping of optimal current directions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;93: 230-236.
37. Hallett M. Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res Rev. 2001;36(2-3):169-174.
38. Weiller C. Imaging recovery from stroke. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 123(1-2):13-17.