Standard errors for the eigenvalues in second-order response surface models

Technometrics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 238-246

  Bisgaard, Søren ^a   Ankenman, Bruce ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Canonical analysis; Confidence intervals; Delta method; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009377192     PISSN: 00401706     EISSN: 15372723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1996.10484503     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, T. W. (1984), An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley.
2. Ankenman, B. E. (1994), “Inference for the Eigenvalues in Second Order Response Surface Models,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept, of Industrial Engineering.
3. Bisgaard, S., and Ankenman, B. E. (1994), “Standard Errors of the Eigenvalues of Second Order Response Surface Models,” Report 113: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement.
4. Box, G. E. P. (1954), “The Exploration and Exploitation of Response Surfaces: Some General Considerations and Examples,” Biometrics, 10, l6-60.
5. Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, New York: John Wiley.
6. Box, G. E. P., and Hunter, J. S. (1954), “A Confidence Region for the Solution of a Set of Simultaneous Equations With an Application to Experimental Design,” Biometrika, 41, 109-199.
7. Box, G. E. P., and Wilson, K. B. (1951), “On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 13, 1-45.
8. Box, G. E. P., and Youle, P. V. (1955), “The Exploration and Exploitation of Response Surfaces: An Example of the Link Between the Fitted Surface and the Basic Mechanism of the System,” Biometrics, 11, 287-323.
9. Carter, W. H., Jr., Chinchilli, V. M. and Campbell, E. D. (1990), “A Large-Sample Confidence Region Useful in Characterizing the Stationary Point of a Quadratic Response Surface,” Technometrics, 32, 425-435.
10. Carter, W. H., Jr., Chinchilli, V. M., Myers, R. H., and Campbell, E. D. (1986), “Confidence Intervals and Improved Ridge Analysis of Response Surfaces,” Technometrics, 28, 339-346.
11. Clarke, G. P. Y. (1987), “Approximate Confidence Limits for a Parameter Function in Nonlinear Regression,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 221-230.
12. Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981), Applied Regression Analysis (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley.
13. Graham, A. (1981), Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus: With Applications, Chichester, U.K.: Halstead Press. Ellis Harwood.
14. Graybill, F. A. (1983), Matrices With Applications in Statistics (2nd ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
15. Henderson, H. V., and Searle, S. R. (1979), “Vec and Vech Operators for Matrices With Some Uses in Jacobians and Multivariate Statistics,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, 1, 65-81.
16. Khuri, A. I., and Cornell, J. A. (1987), Response Surfaces'. Designs and Analyses, New York: Marcel Dekker.
17. Magnus, J. R., and Neudecker, H. (1988), Matrix Differential Calculus With Applications in Statistics and Econometrics, Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley.
18. Myers, R. H. (1976), Response Surface Methodology, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Peterson, J. J. (1993), “A General Approach to Ridge Analysis With Confidence Intervals,” Technometrics, 35, 204-214.
20. Rao, C. R. (1973), Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley.
21. Searle, S. R. (1982), Matrix Algebra Useful for Statistics, New York: John Wiley.