Acoustic preference functions and sexual selection on the male calling song in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 225-233

  Klappert, Kirsten ^a   Reinhold, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURTSHIP; GRASSHOPPER; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; SONG;

ACRIDIDAE; CHORTHIPPUS BIGUTTULUS; ORTHOPTERA;

EID: 0037267078     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2002.2034     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution, 38, 720-734.
2. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution, 38, 709-719.
3. Butlin, R. K., Hewitt, G. M. & Webb, S. F. 1985. Sexual selection for intermediate optimum in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Animal Behaviour, 33, 1281-1292.
4. Gerhardt, H. C. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Animal Behaviour, 42, 615-635.
5. Hedrick, A. V. 2000. Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 267, 671-675.
6. von Helversen, D. 1972. Gesang des Männchens und Lautschema des Weibchens bei der Feldheuschrecke Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 81, 381-422.
7. von Helversen, D. & von Helversen, O. 1975a. Verhaltens-genetische Untersuchungen am akustischen Kommunikationssystem der Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Acrididae). II. Das Lautschema von Artbastarden zwischen Chorthippus biguttulus und Ch. mollis. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 104, 301-323.
8. von Helversen, D. & von Helversen, O. 1975b. Verhaltens-genetische Untersuchungen am akustischen Kommunikationssystem der Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Acrididae). I. Der Gesang von Artbastarden zwischen Chorthippus biguttulus und Ch. mollis. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 104, 273-299.
9. von Helversen, D. & von Helversen, O. 1981. Korrespondenz zwischen Gesang und auslösendem Schema bei Feldheuschrecken. Nova Acta Leopoldina, 54, 449462.
10. von Helversen, D. & von Helversen, O. 1983. Species recognition and acoustic localization in acridid grasshoppers: a behavioral approach. In: Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology (Ed. by F. Huber & H. Markl), pp. 95-107. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. von Helversen, O. & von Helversen, D. 1994. Forces driving coevolution of song and song recognition in grasshoppers. In: Neural Basis of Behavioural Adaptation (Ed. by K. Schildberger, N. Elsner), pp. 253-284. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
12. Hoback, W. W. & Wagner, W. E. 1997. The energetic cost of calling in the variable field cricket, Gryllus lineaticeps. Physiological Entomology, 22, 286-290.
13. Jang, Y. W. & Greenfield, M. D. 1998. Absolute versus relative measurements of sexual selection: assessing the contributions of ultrasonic signal characters to mate attraction in lesser wax moths, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Evolution, 52, 1383-1393.
14. Kriegbaum, H. 1989. Female choice in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. Naturwissenschaften, 76, 81-82.
15. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210-1226.
16. Lehmann, G. U. C. & Lehmann, A. W. 2000. Spermatophore characteristics in bushcrickets vary with parasitism and remating interval. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47, 393-399.
17. Marquez, R. & Bosch, J. 1997. Female preference in complex acoustical environments in the midwife toads Alytes obstetricans and Alytes cisternasii. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 588-594.
18. Murphy, C. G. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2000. Mating preference functions of individual female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, for two properties of male advertisement calls. Evolution, 54, 660-669.
19. Perdeck, A. C. 1957. The isolating value of specific song patterns in two sibling species of grasshoppers (Chorthippus brunneus Thunb. and C. biguttulus L.). Behaviour, 12, 1-74.
20. Reinhold, K., Greenfield, M. D., Jang, Y. W. & Broce, A. 1998. Energetic cost of sexual attractiveness: ultrasonic advertisement in wax moths. Animal Behaviour, 55, 905-913.
21. Reinhold, K., Jacoby, K. & Reinhold, K 2002. Dissecting the repeatability of female choice in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. Animal Behaviour, 64, 245-250.
22. Ritchie, M. G. 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A, 93, 14628-14631.
23. Schluter, D. & Nychka, D. 1994. Exploring fitness surfaces. American Naturalist, 143, 597-616.
24. Shaw, K. L. & Herlihy, D. P. 2000. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 267, 577-584.
25. Wagner, W. E. 1996. Convergent song preferences between female field crickets and acoustically orienting parasitoid flies. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 279-285.
26. Wollerman, L. 1998. Stabilizing and directional preferences of female Hyla ebraccata for calls differing in static properties. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1619-1630.