Evaluating uncertainties in regional photochemical air quality modeling

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 28, Issue , 2003, Pages 59-106

  Fine, James ^a   Vuilleumier, Laurent ^a,b   Reynolds, Steve ^c   Roth, Philip ^c   Brown, Nancy ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL OFFICE OF METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY METEOSWISS   (Switzerland)

^c Envair   (United States)

Author keywords

Atmospheric transport; Emissions controls; Ozone; Simulation models

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; GREEN'S FUNCTION; METEOROLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NITROGEN OXIDES; OZONE; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; POLLUTION CONTROL; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; WIND;

ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT; EMISSION CONTROLS; REGIONAL PHOTOCHEMICAL AIR QUALITY MODELING; SIMULATION MODELS;

AIR QUALITY;

EID: 1642501648     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.011503.163508     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 2002. National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 2000, Appendix A, Tables A-15, A-19. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA, Off. Air Qual. Plan. Stand.
2. Natl. Res. Counc. 1991. Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
3. Off. Technol. Assess. 1989. Catching Our Breadth: Next Steps for Reducing Urban Ozone. Washington, DC: OTA
4. N. Am. Res. Strategy Tropospheric Ozone. 2000. Chapter 4: the air-quality modeling system. In An Assessment of Tropospheric Ozone Pollution: A North American Perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Res. Inst./NARSTO
5. Am. Pet. Inst. 1989. Detailed Analysis of Ozone State Implementation Plans in Seven Areas Selected for Retrospective Evaluation of Reasons for State Implementation Plan Failure. Washington, DC: API, Health Environ. Sci. Dep.
6. Stokey E, Zeckhauser R. 1978. A Primer for Policy Analysis. New York: Norton
7. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1996. Guidance on the Use of Modeled Results to Demonstrate Attainment of the Ozone NAAQS. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA, Off. Air Qual. Plan. Stand.
8. Calif. Air Resour. Board. 1992. Technical Guidance Document: Photochemical Modeling. Calif. EPA, Calif. Air Resour. Board., Sacramento, CA
9. Morgan MG, Henrion M. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
10. Deleted in proof
11. Cleary R. 1976. Mathematical Models. In Boundaries of Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger
12. Russell A. 1997. Regional photochemical air quality modeling: model formulations, history, and state of the science. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 22:537-88
13. Seinfeld J, Pandis S. 1998. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. New York: Wiley
14. Milford JB, Russell AG, McRae GJ. 1989. A new approach to photochemical pollution control: implications of spatial patterns in pollutant responses to reductions in nitrogen oxides and reactive organic gas emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23:1290-301
15. x emissions. J. Geophys. Res. 99:3533-42
16. Bergin MS, Russell AG, Milford JB. 1995. Quantification of individual VOC reactivity using a chemically detailed, three-dimensional photochemical model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29:3029-37
17. Bergin MS, Russell AG, Milford JB. 1998. Effects of chemical mechanism uncertainties on the reactivity quantification of volatile organic compounds using a three-dimensional air quality model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 5:694-703
18. Yang YJ, Wilkinson JG, Russell AG. 1997. Fast, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional photochemical models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:2859-68
19. Hanna SR, Chang JC, Fernau ME. 1998. Monte Carlo estimates of uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to uncertainties in input variables. Atmos. Environ. 32:3619-28
20. Hanna SR, Lu Z, Frey HC, Wheeler N, Vukuvich J, et al. 2001. Uncertainties in predicted ozone concentrations due to input uncertainties for the UAM-V photochemical grid model applied to the July 1995 OTAG domain. Atmos. Environ. 35(5):891-903
21. Jang J-CC, Jeffries HE, Tonnesen S. 1995. Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution-II. Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry. Atmos. Environ. 29:3101-14
22. Marr L, Black D, Harley R. 2002. Formation of photochemical air pollution in Central California: 1. Development of a revised motor vehicle emission inventory. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (D6): 4047; doi:10.1029/2001JD000689
23. Marr L. 2002. Changes in ozone sensitivity to precursor emissions on diurnal, weekly and decadal time scales. In Civil and Environmental Engineering. Berkeley: Univ. Calif.
24. Pierson W, Gertler A, Bradow R. 1990. Comparison of the SCAQS tunnel study with other on-road vehicle emissions data. J. Air Waste Manag. 40:1495-504
25. Harley R, Sawyer R, Milford J. 1997. Updated photochemical modeling for California's south coast air basin: comparison of chemical mechanisms and motor vehicle emissions inventories. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:135-54
26. Sawyer R, Harley R, Cadle S, Norbeck J, Slott R, et al. 2000. Mobile sources critical review: 1998 NARSTO Assessment. Atmos. Environ. 34:2161-81
27. Geron C, Guenther A, Pierce T. 1994. An improved model for estimating emissions of volatile organic compounds from forests in the eastern United States.J. Geophys. Res. 99:12773-91
28. Simpson D, Guenther A, Hewitt C, Steinbrecher R. 1995. Biogenic emissions in Europe. 1. Estimates and uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res. 100:22875-90
29. Matson P. 1997. NOx emission from soils and its consequences for the atmosphere and biosphere - critical gaps and research directions for the future. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 48:1-6
30. Lamanna MS, Goldstein AH. 1999. In situ measurements of C2-C10 volatile organic compounds above a Sierra Nevada ponderosa pine plantation. J. Geophys. Res. 104:21,247-62
31. Schade G, Goldstein A, Lamana M. 1999. Are monoterpene emissions influenced by humidity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 26:2187-90
32. Russell A, Dennis R. 2000. NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling. Atmos. Environ. 34:2283-324
33. Stauffer D, Seaman N. 1990. Use of four dimensional data assimilation in a limited area mesoscale, part I: experiments with synoptic data. Mon. Weather Rev. 118:1250-77
34. Vuilleumier L, Harley RA, Brown NJ, Slusser JR, Kolinski D, et al. 2001. Variability in ultraviolet total optical depth during the Southern California ozone study (SCOS97). Atmos. Environ. 35:1111-22
35. Vuilleumier L, Brown NJ, Harley RA, Reynolds SD. 2000. Review and Improvement of Methods for Estimating Rates of Photolysis in Photochemical Models. Vol. II: User's Guide for TUVAQM Radiative Transfer and Photolysis Module. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.
36. Lurmann F, Carter W, Coyner L. 1987. A Surrogate Species Chemical Reaction Mechanism for Urban-Scale Air Quality Simulation Models, Vols. I, II. Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environ. Prot. Agency
37. Gery MW, Whitten GZ, Killus JP, Dodge MC. 1989. A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 94:12,925-56
38. Jeffries HE, Tonnesen S. 1994. A comparison of two photochemical reaction mechanisms using a mass balance and process analysis. Atmos. Environ. 28:2991-3003
39. Dennis R, Byun D, Novak J, Galluppi K, Coats C, et al. 1996. The next generation of integrated air quality modeling: EPA's Models-3. Atmos. Environ. 30:1925-38
40. Byun DW, Coats CJ, Hwang D, Fine S, Odman T, et al. 1995. Prototyping and implementation of multiscale air quality models for high performance computing. Presented at High Perform. Comput. Symp. 1995: Grand Chall. Comput. Simul. Proc. 1995 Simul. Multiconf., Phoenix, AZ, April 9-13, ed. AM Tentner, pp. 527-32. San Diego, CA: Soc. Comput. Simul.
41. Morris R, Myer T, Douglas S, Yocke M, Mirabella V. 1991. Development of a nested-grid urban airshed model and application to Southern California. Presented at 84th Natl. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. Meet., Vancouver, Can., June 16-21
42. Odman M, Russell A. 1991. Multiscale modeling of pollutant transport with chemistry. J. Geophys. Res. 96:7363-70
43. Wesely ML, Hicks BB. 2000. A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition. Atmos. Environ. 34:2261-82
44. Seaman NL. 2000. Meteorological modeling for air-quality assessments. Atmos. Environ. 34:2231-59
45. Dabdub D, Seinfeld JH. 1995. Extrapolation techniques used in the solution of stiff ODEs associated with chemical kinetics of air quality models. Atmos. Environ. 29:403-10
46. Winner DA, Cass GR. 1999. Modeling the long-term frequency distribution of regional ozone concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 33:431-51
47. Winner DA, Cass GR. 2001. Modeling the long-term frequency distribution of regional ozone concentrations using synthetic meteorology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:3718-26
48. Guinnup D, Collom B, cochairm. 1997. Final Rep., Vol. I. Exec. Summ: OTAG Air Qual. Anal. Workgr., Ozone Transp. Assess. Group
49. Roth P, Tesche T, Reynolds S, Seinfeld J. 1997. A Critical Review of Regulatory Air Quality Modeling for Tropospheric Ozone. Washington, DC: Am. Pet. Inst. for NARSTO
50. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1986. Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised). Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA. EPA-450-2-78-027R
51. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1987. Guideline on Air Quality Models, Suppl. A. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA. EPA-450/2-78-027R-A
52. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1991. Guideline for Regulatory Application of the Urban Airshed Model. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA
53. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1992. Protocol for Determining the Best Performing Model. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA, Off. Air Qual. Plan. Stand.
54. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1993. User's Guide for the Urban Airshed Model, Vol. IV. Research Triangle Par, NC: US EPA Off. Air Qual. Plan Stand.
55. Deleted in proof.
56. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1993. Guidance for Growth Factors, Projections and Control Strategies for the 15 Percent Rate-of-Progress Plans. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA
57. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1997. Guidance for Emissions Inventory Development. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA
58. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1999. Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA, Off. Air Qual. Plan. Stand.
59. Sistla G, Zhou N, Hao W, Ku J-Y, Rao ST, et al. 1996. Effects of uncertainties in meteorological inputs on urban air-shed model predictions and ozone control strategies. Atmos. Environ. 30:2011-25
60. Roth P. 1999. A qualitative approach to evaluating the anticipated reliability of a photochemical air quality simulation model for a selected application. J. Air Waste Mgmt. Assoc. 49:1050-59
61. Woodward CS, Grant KE, Maxwell R. 2002. Applications of sensitivity analysis to uncertainty quantification for variably saturated flow. In Computational Methods in Water Resources, Vol. 1, ed. SM Hassanizadeh, RJ Schotting, WG Gray, GF Pinder, pp 73-80. Amsterdam: Elsevier
62. Grant K, Woodward CS, Serban R, Brown PN, Maxwell R, et al. 2002. Sensitivity analysis based uncertainty estimation. Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. Tech. Rep. UCRL-PRES-150160, Dec.
63. 2 reaction rate coefficient via the separable rotation approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 100:17740-55
64. Cho S-Y, Carmichael G, Rabitz H. 1988. Relationship between primary emissions and regional air quality and acid deposition in Eulerian models determined by sensitivity analysis. Water Air Soil Pollut. 40:9-13
65. Tilden JW, Costanza V, McRae GJ, Seinfeld JH. 1981. Modeling of Chemical Reaction Systems, ed. KH Ebert, P Deuflhard, W Jager, pp. 69-91. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
66. Cukier RI, Levine HB, Shuler KE. 1978. Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 11:1137-62
67. Rabitz H, Kramer M, Dacol D. 1983. Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34:419-61
68. Iman RL, Conover WJ. 1982. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Commun. Stat. B 11:311-34
69. Iman RL, Conover WJ. 1982. Sensitivity analysis techniques: self-teaching curriculum. In Nuclear Regul. Commission Rep., NUREG/CR-2350. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia Natl. Lab.
70. Iman RL, Shortencarier MJ. 1984. A FORTRAN 77 program and user's guide for the generation of Latin hypercube and random samples for use with computer models. In Nuclear Regul. Commission Rep., NUREG/CR-3624. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia Natl. Lab.
71. Iman RL, Helton JC. 1985. A Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models. Livermore, CA: Sandia Natl. Lab.
72. Milford JB, Gao D, Russell AG, McRae GJ. 1992. Use of sensitivity analysis to compare chemical mechanisms for air-quality modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:1179-89
73. Kuhn M, Builtjes PJH, Poppe D, Simpson D, Stockwell WR, et al. 1998. Inter-comparison of the gas-phase chemistry in several chemistry and transport models. Atmos. Environ. 32:693-709
74. Russell AG, Milford JB, Bergin MS, McBride SJ, McNair LA, et al. 1995. Urban ozone control and atmospheric reactivity of organic gases. Science 269:491-95
75. Hamby DM. 1994. A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environ. Monit. Assess. 32:135-54
76. Dunker AM. 1981. Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models. Atmos. Environ. 15:1155-61
77. Dunker AM. 1984. The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 81:2385-93
78. Dunker A, Yarwood G, Ortmann JP, Wilson GM. 2002. The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model-Implementation, accuracy and efficiency. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:2965-76
79. Bischof C, Carle A, Corliss G, Griewank A, Hovland P. 1992. ADIFOR Generating Derivative Codes from FORTRAN Programs. Argonne, IL: Argonne Natl. Lab.
80. Bischof C, Carle A, Khademi P, Mauer A. 1994. The ADIFOR2.0 System for the Automatic Differentiation of FORTRAN 77 Programs. Argonne, IL: Argonne Natl. Lab.
81. Vuilleumier L, Harley R, Brown N. 1997. First- and second-order sensitivity analysis of a photochemically reactive system (a Green's Function approach). Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:1206-17
82. Elbern H, Schmidt H. 1999. A four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation scheme for Eulerian chemistry transport modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 104:18,583-98
83. Cukier RI, Fortuin CM, Shuler KE, Petschek AG, Schaibly JH. 1973. Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. J. Chem. Phys. 59:3873-78
84. McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ. 1979. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21:239-45
85. Tatang MA, Pan W, Prinn RG, McRae GJ. 1997. An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models. J. Geophys. Res. 102:21,925-32
86. Bergin MS, Milford JB. 2000. Application of Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis to a Lagrangian photochemical air quality model. Atmos. Environ. 34:781-92
87. Hansen A. 2000. Uncertainties in predicted ozone concentrations due to input uncertainties for the UAM-V photochemical grid model applied to the July 1995 OTAG domain . Palo Alto, CA/St. Louis; MO: Electr. Power Res. Inst.
88. Gao D, Stockwell WR, Milford JB. 1995. First-order sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for a regional-scale gas-phase chemical mechanism. J. Geophys. Res. 100:23153-66
89. Gao D, Stockwell WR, Milford JB. 1996. Global uncertainty analysis of a region-scale gas-phase chemical mechanism. J. Geophys. Res. 101:9107-19
90. Bergin MS, Noblet GS, Petrini K, Dhieux JR, Milford JB, et al. 1999. Formal uncertainty analysis of a Lagrangian photochemical air pollution model. Environ. Sci. Technol.:1116-26
91. Stockwell WR, Milford JB. Gao D, Yang YJ. 1995. The effect of acetyl peroxyperoxy radial reactions on peroxyacetyl nitrate and ozone concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 29:1591-99
92. Yang YJ, Stockwell WR, Milford JB. 1995. Uncertainties in incremental reactivities of volatile organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29:1336-45
93. Yang YJ, Stockwell WR, Milford JB. 1996. Effect of chemical product yield uncertainties on reactivities of VOCs and emissions from reformulated gasolines and methanol fuels. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:1392-97
94. Falls AH, McRae GJ, Seinfeld JH. 1979. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for a regional-scale gas-phase chemical mechanism. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 11:1137-62
95. Milford JB, Gao D, Zafirakou A, Pierce T. 1994. Ozone precursor levels and responses to emissions reductions; analysis of regional oxidant model results. Atmos. Environ. 28:2093-104
96. McBride SJ, Oravetz MA, Russell AG. 1997. Cost-benefit and uncertainty issues in using organic reactivity to regulate urban ozone. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:238A-44A
97. Carter WPL. 1994. Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 44:881-99
98. Reynolds SD, Roth PM, Tesche TW. 1992. Guidance for evaluating photochemical model performance. Presented at Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 85th Annu. Meet. Exhib., Kansas City, MO, June 21-26
99. Reynolds SD, Roth PM, Tesche TW. 1994. A Process for Stressful Evaluation of Photochemical Model Performance. San Rafael, CA: Envair
100. Tonnesen G, Wang Z. 2001. Interim rep.: evaluation of TNRCC SIP modeling using a chemical process analysis. Univ. Calif. Irvine
101. Roth PM, Reynolds SD, Blanchard CL. 1998. Protocol for Evaluating the Performance of the SARMAP Model. San Anselmo: Envair
102. Vuilleumier L, Bamer JT, Harley RA, Brown NJ. 2001. Evaluation of nitrogen dioxide photolysis rates in an urban area using data from the 1997 Southern California ozone study. Atmos. Environ. 35:6525-37
103. Jeffries HE. 1984. A Photochemical Reaction Mechanism Analysis Method Applied to Two Mechanisms. Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina
104. Crouse RR. 1990. Integrated reaction rate analysis of ozone prediction in a photochemical oxidant model. Diss. Master. Dep. Environ. Sci./Eng., Univ. N.C., Chapel Hill
105. DaMassa J, Tanrikulu S, Magliano K, Ranzieri A, Niccum L. 1996. Performance Evaluation of SAQM in Central California and Attainment Demonstration for the August 3-6, 1990 Ozone Episode. Sacramento: Calif. Air Resour. Board.
106. Hogrefe C, Rao ST, Kasibhatla P, Kallos G, Tremback CJ, et al. 2001. Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems: Part I, meteorological predictions. Atmos. Environ. 35:4159-74
107. Hogrefe C, Rao ST, Zurbenko IG, Porter PS. 2000. Interpreting the information in ozone observations and model predictions relevant to regulatory policies in the eastern United States. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81:2083-106
108. Hogrefe C, Rao ST, Kasibhatla P, Hao W, Sistla G, et al. 2001. Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems: Part II, ozone predictions. Atmos. Environ. 35:4175-88
109. Biswas J, Hogrefe C, Rao ST, Hao W, Sistla G. 2001. Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems. Part III, precursor predictions. Atmos. Environ. 35:6129-49
110. Zhang J, Rao ST, Daggupaty SM. 1998. Meteorological processes and ozone exceedances in the northeastern United States during the 12-16 July 1995 episode. J. Appl. Meteorol. 37:776-89
111. Helmer O. 1963. The Systematic Use of Expert Judgment in Operations Research. Santa Monica: Rand Corp.
112. Dalkey N. 1968. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. Santa Monica: Rand Corp.
113. Blanchard CL, Lurmann FW, Korc M, Roth PM. 1994. The Use of Ambient Data to Corroborate Analyses of Ozone Control Strategies. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA
114. Johnson GM, Azzi M. 1992. Notes on the Derivation: The Integrated Empirical Rate Model (V2.2). North Ryde, NSW, Aust.: CSIRO Div. Coal Energy Technol.
115. Blanchard CL, Roberts PT, Chinkin LR, Roth PM. 1995. Application of smog production (SP) algorithms to the Coastal Oxidant Assessment for Southeast Texas (COAST) data. Pap. 95-TP15.04 Presented at the Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 88th Annu. Meet. Exhib., San Antonio, TX, June 18-23
116. x Is Likely to Be More Effective for Reducing Ozone Concentrations. Washington, DC: Am. Pet. Inst.
117. Blanchard CL, Lurmann FW, Roth PM, Jeffries HE, Korc M. 1999. The use of ambient data to corroborate analyses of ozone control strategies. Atmos. Environ. 33:369-381
118. y in photochemically aged air. J. Geophys. Res. 98:2917-26
119. Cardelino CA, Chameides WL. 1995. An observation-based method for analyzing ozone precursor relationships in the urban atmosphere. J. Air Waste Manag. 45:161-80
120. Blanchard CL. 2000. Ozone process insights from field experiments. Part III: extent of reaction and ozone formation. Atmos. Environ. 34:2035-43
121. Kleinman LI. 2000. Ozone process insights from field experiments. Part II: observation-based analysis for ozone production. Atmos. Environ. 34:2023-33
122. Trainer M, Parrish DD, Goldan PD, Roberts J, Fehsenfeld FC. 2000. Review of observation-based analysis of the regional factors influencing ozone concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 34:2045-61
123. Texas Comm. Environ. Qual. 2002. Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Control of Ozone Air Pollution: Post-1999 Rate-of-Progress and Attainment Demonstration Follow-up SIP for the Houston/Galveston Ozone Nonattainment Area. Austin: TCEQ
124. Biswas J, Rao ST. 2001. Uncertainties in episodic ozone modeling stemming from uncertainties in the meteorological fields. J. Appl. Meteorol. 40:117-36
125. Reynolds S, Michaels H, Roth P, Tesche TW, McNally D, et al. 1994. The Importance of Using Alternative Base Cases in Photochemical Modeling. Washington, DC: Am. Pet. Inst.
126. Reynolds S, Michaels H, Roth P, Tesche T, McNally D, et al. 1996. Alternative base cases in photochemical modeling: their construction, role, and value. Atmos. Environ. 30:1977-98