A four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation scheme for Eulerian chemistry transport modeling

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 104, Issue D15, 1999, Pages 18583-18598

  Elbern, Hendrik ^a   Schmidt, Hauke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; EULERIAN MODEL; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT;

EID: 0033587851     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/1999jd900280     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Austin, J., Toward the four-dimensional assimilation of stratospheric chemical constituents, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2569-2588, 1992.
2. Bennett, A., Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1992.
3. Bott, A., A positive definite advection scheme obtained by nonlinear renormalization of advective fluxes, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1006-1015, 1989.
4. Chang, J. S., R. A. Brost, I. S. A. Isaksen, S. Madronich, P. Middleton, W. R. Stockwell, and C. J. Walcek, A three-dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 14,618-14,700, 1987.
5. Chao, W. C., and L.-P. Chang, Development of a four-dimensional variational analysis system using the adjoint method at GLA, Part 1, Dynamics, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1661-1673, 1992.
6. Courant, R., and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 1, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1953.
7. Courtier, P., J.-N. Thépaut, and A. Hollingsworth, A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 120, 1367-1387, 1994.
8. Courtier, P., E. Anderson, W. Heckley, J. Pailleux, D. Vasiliević, M. Hamrud, A. Hollingsworth, F. Rabier, and M. Fisher, The ECMWF implementation of the three-dimensional variational assimilation (3D-Var), I, Formulation, Q. J. R. Met, Soc., 124, 1783-1807, 1998.
9. Daley, R., Atmospheric Data Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1991.
10. Dennis, R. L., D. W. Byun, J. H. Novak, K. J. Galluppi, C. J. Coats, and M. A. Vouk, The next generation of integrated air quality modeling: EPA's Models-3, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1925-1938, 1996.
11. Elbern, H., Parallelization and load balancing of a comprehensive atmospheric chemistry transport model. Atmos. Environ., 31, 3561-3574, 1997.
12. Elbern, H., J. Kowol, R. Sládkovic, and A. Ebel, Deep stratospheric intrusions: A statistical assessment with model guided analyses, Atmos. Environ., 31, 3207-3226, 1997a.
13. Elbern H., H. Schmidt, and A. Ebel, Variational data assimilation for tropospheric chemistry modeling. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15,967-15,985, 1997b.
14. Eskes, H. J., A. J. M. Piters, P. F. Levelt, M. A. F. Allart, and H. M. Kelder, Variational assimilation of total-column ozone satellite data in a 2D lat-lon tracer-transport model, J. Atmos. Sci., in press, 1999.
15. Fedorov, V., Kriging and other estimators of spatial field characteristics (with special reference to environmental studies), Atmos. Environ., 23, 175-184, 1989.
16. Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., and J. N. Pitts, Atmospheric Chemistry, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1986.
17. Fisher, M., and D. J. Lary, Lagrangian four-dimensional variational data assimilation of chemical species, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 121, 1681-1704, 1995.
18. Gandin, L. S., Objective analysis of meteorological fields, Isr. Program for Sci. Transl., Jerusalem, 1965.
19. Griewank, A., and A. Walther, Treeverse: An implementation of checkpointing for the reverse or adjoint mode of computational differentiation, IOKOMO-04-1997, Tech. Univ. Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 1997.
20. Hass, H., Description of the EURAD chemistry-transport-model Version 2 (CTM2), Mitt. Inst. Geophys. Meteorol. Univ. Köln, Nr. 83, Köln, Germany, 1991.
21. Hass, H., H. J. Jakobs, and M. Memmesheimer, Analysis of a regional model (EURAD) near surface gas concentration predictions using observations from networks, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 57, 173-201, 1995.
22. Hesstvedt, E., Ø. Hov, and I. S. A. Isaksen, Quasi-steady state approximation in air pollution modeling: Comparison of two numerical schemes for oxidant prediction, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 10, 971-994, 1978.
23. Ide, K., P. Courtier, M. Ghil, and A. Lorenc, Unified notation for data assimilation: operational sequential and variational, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 75, 181-189, 1997.
24. Jeuken, A. B. M., H. J. Eskes, P. F. J. van Velthoven, H. M. Kelder, and E. V. Hólm, Assimilation of total ozone satellite measurements in a three-dimensional tracer transport model. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 5551-5563, 1999.
25. Kuhn, M., et al., Intercomparison of the gas-phase chemistry in several chemistry and transport models, Atmos. Environ., 32, 693-709, 1998.
26. Levelt, P. F., B. V. Khattatov, J. C. Gille, G. P. Brasseur, X. X. Tie, and J. W. Waters, Assimilation of MLS ozone measurements in the global three-dimensional chemistry transport model ROSE, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 4493-4496, 1998.
27. Liu, D. C., and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale minimization, Math. Program., 45, 503-528, 1989.
28. Lorenc, A. C., Analysis methods for numerical weather predictions, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 1177-1194, 1986.
29. Madronich, S., Photodissociation in the atmosphere, 1, Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 9740-9752, 1987.
30. McRae, G. J., W. R. Goodin, and J. H. Seinfeld, Numerical solution of the atmospheric diffusion equation for chemically reacting flows, J. Comput. Phys., 45, 1-42, 1982.
31. Nocedal, J., Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage, Math. Comput., 35, 773-782, 1980.
32. Peters, L., et al., The current state and future direction of Eulerian models in simulating the tropospheric chemistry and transport of trace species: A review. Atmos. Environ., 28, 189-222, 1995.
33. Riishojgaard, L. P., A direct way of specifying flow-dependent background error correlations for meteorological analysis systems, Tellus, Ser. A, 50, 42-57, 1998.
34. Robertson, L., and J. Langner, Source function estimate by means of variational data assimilation applied to the ETEX-I tracer experiment, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4219-4225, 1998.
35. Robertson, L., and C. Persson, On the application of four dimensional data assimilation of air pollution data using the adjoint technique, in Air Pollution Modeling and its Application, vol. 9, edited by H. van Dop and G. Kallos, Plenum, New York, 1992.
36. Salby, M. L., Sampling theory for asynoptic satellite observations, I, Space time spectra, resolution, and aliasing, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 2577-2600, 1982a.
37. Salby, M. L., Sampling theory for asynoptic satellite observations, II, Fast Fourier synoptic mapping, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 2601-2614, 1982b.
38. Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley, New York, 1998.
39. Sillman, S., J. Logan, and S. Wofsy, The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 1837-1851, 1990.
40. Stockwell, W. R., P. Middleton, J. S. Chang, and X. Tang, The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16,343-16,367, 1990.
41. Stoer, J., and R. Bulirsch, Einführung in die Numerische Mathematik H, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978.
42. Talagrand, O., and P. Courtier, Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation, I, Theory, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 113, 1311-1328, 1987.
43. Yanenko, N. N., The Method of Fractional Steps, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
44. Zou, X., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y.-H. Kuo, Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-435-STR, Nat. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo., 1997.