Monte Carlo estimates of uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to uncertainties in input variables

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 32, Issue 21, 1998, Pages 3619-3628

  Hanna, Steven R ^a   Chang, Joseph C ^a   Fernau, Mark E ^a  

^a Earth Tech   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OZONE; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; RANDOM PROCESSES; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

PHOTOCHEMICAL GRID MODELS;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL;

OZONE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

EMISSION CONTROL; MODELING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; OZONE; PARAMETERIZATION; PHOTOCHEMISTRY;

AIR MONITORING; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; METEOROLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032210775     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00419-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ang A. H.-S., Tang W. H. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol 2. Decision, Risk, and Reliability:1984;Wiley, New York.
2. Atkinson R. A., Baulch D. L., Cox R. A., Hampson R. F. Jr., Kerr J. A., Troe J. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry. Supplement IV. IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric Chemistry. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. 21:1992;1125-1135.
3. Barchet, W. R., Roth, P. M. and Tesche, T. W. (1994) Evaluating the Risks of Developing Inaccurate Emissions Control Recommendations using Regional Photochemical Air Quality Simulation Models: A Draft Protocol. Prepared for EPRI, P.O. Box 10412, Palo Alto, California. Dated 19 January 1994, plus 24 March 1994 Addendum, total 123 pp.
4. Carmichael G. R., Sandu A., Potra F. A. Sensitivity analysis for atmospheric chemistry models via automatic differentiation. Atmospheric Environment. 31:1997;475-489.
5. Conover W. J. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 2:1971;Wiley, New York.
6. Dunker A. M. Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models. Atmospheric Environment. 15:1981;1155-1161.
7. Dunker A. M. The decoupled direct method forcalculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics. Journal of Chemical Physics. 81:1984;2385-2393.
8. EPA (1990) User's Guide for the Urban Airshed Model (Five Volumes). EPA-450/4-90-007, U.S. EPA/OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
9. EPA (1991) Guidelines for Regulatory Applications of the Urban Airshed Model. EPA-450/4-91-013. NTIS No.PB92-108760. USEPA/OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
10. Fernau, M. E., Schulman, L. L. and Scire, J. S. (1995) Application of CALMET to the 4-11 July 1988 Episode for the Modeling Ozone Cooperative. Final Report, MOCA c/o Edison Electric Institute, 701 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, District of Columbia.
11. Gao D., Stockwell W. R., Milford J. B. First-order sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for a regional-scale gas-phase chemical mechanism. Journal of Geophysics Research. 100D:1995;23,153-23,166.
12. Gao D., Stockwell W. R., Milford J. B. Global uncertainty analysis of a regional-scale gas-phase chemical mechanism. Journal of Geophysics Research. 101:1996;9107-9119.
13. Hanna S. R. Confidence limits for air quality models, as estimated by bootstrap and jackknife resampling methods. Atmospheric Environment. 23:1989;1385-1395.
14. Hanna, S. R. and Fernau, M.E. (1997) Photochemical Model Evaluations in the Northeast. Final Report prepared for the American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street NW, Washington, District of Columbia.
15. Hanna S. R., Moore G. E., Fernau M. E. Evaluation of photochemical grid models (UAM-IV, UAM-V, and the ROM/UAM-IV couple) using data from the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS). Atmospheric Environment. 30:1996;3265-3279.
16. Hansen D. A., Dennis R. L., Ebel A., Hanna S., Kaye J., Thuillier R. The quest for an advanced regional air quality model. Environmental Science and Technology. 28:1994;560A-569A.
17. IAEA (1989) Evaluating the Reliability of Predictions made using Environmental Transfer Models. IAEA Safety Series No. 100. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
18. Irwin J. S., Rao S. T., Petersen W. B., Turner D. B. Relating error bounds for maximum concentration estimates to diffusion meteorology uncertainty. Atmospheric Environment. 21:1987;1927-1938.
19. Isukapalli, S. S., Roy, A. and Georgopoulos, P. G. (1995) Stochastic response Surface Methods (SRSMs) for uncertainty propagation: application to physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling. Draft manuscript available from Rutgers Univ. EOHSI, 681 Frelinghuysen Rd., Piscataway, New Jersey.
20. McRae, G. J., Goodin, W. R. and Seinfeld, J. H. (1982) Mathematical Modeling of Photochemical Air Pollution. Tech. Report, Environ. Qual. Lab., California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; EQL Report No. 18.
21. Milford J. D., Gao D., Russell A. G., McRae G. J. Use of sensitivity analysis to compare chemical mechanisms for air-quality modeling. Environmental Science and Technology. 26:1992;1179-1189.
22. Morgan M. G., Henrion M. Uncertainty. A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis:1990;Cambridge University Press, New York.
23. National Research Council NationalAcademy Press Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution. 1991;National Academy Press, Washington DC.
24. NCRP (1996) A Guide for Uncertainty Analysis in Dose and Risk Assessments Related to Environmental Contamination (ed. F. O. Hoffman), NCRP Commentary No. 14, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 7910 Woodmont Ave., Bethesda, Maryland.
25. NYSDEC (1994) New York State Implementation Plan for Ozone. Vol. I, Appendix A-3: New York airshed urban airshed modeling, July 5 to 11 base case. Division of Air Resources, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York.
26. Olesen H. R. Toward the establishment of a common framework for model evaluation. Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XI. 1995;519-528 Plenum Press, New York.
27. Rabitz, H. and Hales, J. (1995) An ACP Primer on Sensitivity Analysis. Monthly Update, DOE Atmospheric Chemistry Program, Vol. 6, No. 11, K9-30, BPNL, POB 999, Richland, Washington, 1-7.
28. Rabitz H., Kramer M., Docol D. Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 34:1983;419-461.
29. Scheffe R. D., Morris R. E. A review of the development and application of the Urban Airshed Model. Atmospheric Environment. 27B:1993;23-39.
30. Stolarski R. S, Butler D. M., Rundel R. D. Uncertainty propagation in a stratospheric model 2. Monte Carlo analysis of imprecisions due to reaction rates. Journal of Geophysics Research. 83:1978;3074-3078.
31. Tatang, M. A. (1995) Direct incorporation of uncertainty in chemical and environmental engineering systems. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
32. Thompson A. M., Stewart R. W. Effect of chemical kinetic uncertainties on calculated constituents in a tropospheric photochemical model. Journal of Geophysics Research. 96:1991;13,089-13,108.
33. Yang Y.-J., Stockwell W. R., Milford J. B. Uncertainties in incremental reactivities of volatile organic compounds. Environmental Science and Technology. 29:1995;1336-1345.