A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 24-36

  Olaniran, Bolanle A ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TELECONFERENCING;

COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; DECISION CONFIDENCE; FACE TO FACE MEETINGS; GROUP PROCESS SATISFACTION;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0029772410     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014492996120373     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Archer, J. 1990, A comparison of computer conferences with face-to-face meetings for small group business decisions, Behaviour and Information Technology, 9, 307-317.
2. Bailey, J. E. and Pearson, S. W. 1983, Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer satisfaction, Management Science, 29, 519-523.
3. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. 1975, Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (John Wiley, New York).
4. Culnan, M. J. 1984, The dimensions of accessibility to online information: implications for implementing of® ce information systems, ACM Transaction of Office Information Systems, 2, 141-150.
5. Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. 1986, Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural determinants, Management Science, 33, 589-609.
6. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H. and Trevino, L. K. 1987, Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems, MIS Quarterly, 11, 355-366.
7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1989, User acceptance of communication technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
8. Deese, D. 1978, Experiences measure user satisfaction, Proceedings of the Computer Measurement Group of ACM, Dallas, Texas.
9. Diehl, M. and Stroebe, W. 1987, Productivity loss in brainstrom-ing groups: toward the solution of a riddle, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
10. Diehl, M. and Stroebe, W. 1991, Productivity loss in idea generating groups: tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
11. Fisher, B. A. and Ellis, D. G. 1990, Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the group process, 3rd edn. (McGraw Hill, New York).
12. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. and Steinfield, C. W. 1990, A social influence model of technology use, in J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (eds), Organizations and Communication Technology (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 117-140.
13. Gouran, D. S. 1973, Correlates of member satisfaction in group decision-making discussions, Central States Speech Journal, 24, 91-96.
14. Hecht, M. 1978a, The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction, Human Communication Research, 4, 253-264.
15. Hecht, M. 1978b, Measures of communication satisfaction, Human Communication Research, 4, 350-368.
16. Hecht, M. 1978c, Toward a conceptualization of communication satisfaction, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 47-62.
17. Hecht, M. and Riley, P. 1985, A three factor model of group satisfaction and consensus, Communication Research Reports, 2, 179-187.
18. Heimstra, G. 1982, Teleconferencing concern for face, and organizational culture, in M. Burgoon (ed.), Communication Yearbook, 6, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 874-904.
19. Heslin, R. and Dunphy, D. 1964, Three dimensions of member satisfaction in small groups, Human Relations, 17, 99-112.
20. Hiltz, S. R. and Johnson, K. 1990, User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems, Management Science, 36, 739-764.
21. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K. and Turoff, M. 1986, Experiment in group decision making communication process and outcome in face to face vs. computerized conference, Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
22. Hiltz, S., Kerr, E. and Johnson, K. 1985, Determinants of acceptance of computer-mediated communication systems: a longitudinal study of four systems, Research report no. 22, Computerized Conferencing and Communication Center, New Jersey institute of Technology.
23. Hiltz, S. R. and Turoff, M. 1982, The effects of formal human leadership and computer-mediated decision aids on group problem solving via computer: a controlled experiment. Research report no. 18, Computerized Conferencing and Communication Center, New Jersey institute of Technology.
24. Ives, B., Olson, M. H. and Baroudi, J. J. 1983, The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communication of the ACM, 26, 785-793.
25. Jarboe, S. C. 1988, A comparison of input-output, process-output, and input-process-output models of small group problemsolving effectiveness, Communication Monographs, 55, 121 -142.
26. Jarboe, S. C. 1986, The effects of discussion procedure, task solution multiplicity, and topic on group communication, productivity, and satisfaction, Doctoral dissertation, university of Wisconsin, Dissertation Abstract International, 47, 1925a.
27. Jurma, W. E. 1978, Leadership structuring style, task ambiguity and group member satisfaction, Small Group Behaviour, 9, 124-134.
28. Keyton, J. 1991, Evaluating individual group member satisfaction as a situational variable. Small Group Research, 22, 200-219.
29. Larcker, D. F. and Lessig, V. P. 1980, Perceived usefulness of information: a psychometric examination, Decision Sciences, 11, 121-134.
30. Lewis-Beck, M. 1980, Applied Regression: An introduction (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
31. Marston, P. J. and Hecht, M. 1988, Group satisfaction, in R. S. Cathcart and L. A. Samovar (eds), Small Group Communication: A reader (Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa), 236-246.
32. McGrath, J. E. 1984, Interaction and Performance (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
33. McGrath, J. E. 1990, Time matters in groups, in J. Galegher, R. Kraut and C. Egido (eds), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 000-000.
34. Melone, N. P. 1990, A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research, Management Science, 36, 76-91.
35. Nass, C., and Steur, J. 1993, Voices, boxes, and sources of messages: computers and social actors, Human Communication Research, 19, 504-527.
36. Olaniran, B. A. 1994, Group performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication media. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 256-281.
37. Olaniran, B. A. 1993a, Individual differences in computer-mediated communication: the role of perception. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3.
38. Olaniran, B. A. 1993b, Integrative approach for managing successful computer-mediated communication technological innovation. Ohio Speech Journal, 31, 37-53.
39. Rice, R. 1993, Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451-484.
40. Rice, R. E. 1984, Mediated group communication, in R. E. Rice and Associates (eds), The New Media: Communication, research, and technology (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 129-156.
41. Rice, R. E. and Case, D. 1983, Electronic message systems in the university: a description of use and utility, Journal of Communication, 33, 131-152.
42. Rogers, E. M. 1983, Diffusions of Innovations, 3rd edn (Free Press, New York).
43. Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. 1976, The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (John Wiley & sons, London).
44. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S. and McGuire, T. W. 1986, Group process in computer mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Processes, 37, 157-187.
45. Smith, J. Y. and Vanecek, M. T. 1990, Dispersed group decision making using nonsimultaneous computer conferencing: a report of research, Journal ofManagement Information System, 7, 71-92.
46. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. 1986, Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication, Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
47. Trevino, L. K. and Webster, J. 1992, Flow in computer-mediated communication: electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts, Communication Research, 19, 539-573.
48. Valacich, J. S., Paranka, D., George, J. F. and Nunamaker, J. R., Jr., 1993, communication concurrency and the new media: a new dimension for media richness, Communication Research, 20, 249-276.
49. Wall, V. D. and Galanes, G. J. 1986, The symlog dimensions and small group conflict, Central States Speech Journal, 37, 61-78.
50. Wall, V. D., Galanes, G. J. and Love, S. B. 1987, Small task oriented groups: conflict, conflict management, satisfaction, and decision quality, Small Group Behavior, 18, 31-55.
51. Walther, J. B. 1994, Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
52. Walther, J. B. 1992, Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective, Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
53. Walther, J. B. 1990, Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, unpublished Doctoral Dissertation university of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
54. Walther, J. B. 1989, The measurement of satisfaction in computer meetings systems, unpublished Manuscript university of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
55. Walther, J. B. and Burgoon, J. K. 1992, Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
56. Wanous, J. P. and Lawler, E. E. 1972, Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 95-105.