Contemporary perspectives on post-core systems

Australian Endodontic Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 120-127

  Berekally, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; REVIEW; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TOOTH, NONVITAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1542542548     PISSN: 13291947     EISSN: 17474477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2003.tb00534.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Brernner M.D.K. The Story of Dentistry. New Yor-k: Dental Items of Interest Publishing Co., 1939.
2. Sorensen JA, Moflriiof. J.T. lntracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically-treated teeth. J Prostlet Dent 1984; 5 I: 780-4.
3. Sorensenj A. Preservation of tooth structure. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988; 16: 15-22
4. Abou-Rass M. Post and core trestoration of endodonticallytreated teeth. Curr O p Dent 1992; 2: 99-107.
5. Manning K.E., Yli D.C., Yu H.C., Kwon E. W Factors to consider for predictable post and core build-ups of endodonticallyti-eated teeth. Part I: Basic theoretical concepts. J Can Dent Assoc 1995; 61.685-95.
6. GutmonnJi. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biological considerations in restoring endodontically-treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992: 67: 458-67.
7. Sigers.J E.. johnson WT. Restoration of endodontically-treated teeth. Dent Clin Notth Am 1992: 36-631. 50.
8. Morgano S M. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 375-80.
9. McLcon A. Predictably restoring endodontically-treated teeth. J Can Dent Assoc 1998; 64: 782-7.
10. Giuskin A.H.. Ahmat! I, Herrero D.B. The aesthetic post and core' unifying radicular form and structure. Pac Proced Aesthet Dent2002; 14.313 21.
11. Bochicha WS., Difiore PM., Miiier D.A.. Lautenschiager E.P. Pashiey D.H. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 1998: 24: 703-8.
12. Pest L.B.. Cavoiii S. Bertoni P. Gagliani M Adhesive postendodontic restorations with fibre posts. Push out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 596-602.
13. Ray H.A., Trope N. Periapical status of endodontically-treated teeth in relation to technical quality of the root canal filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 12-18.
14. Tronstad L., Asbjormeri K., Doving L., Pedersen l ., Eriksen H. H. Influence of cororial restorations on the periapical health of endodontically-treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000: 16: 2 18-21
15. Swanson K, Madison S. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodonticallytreated teeth. Part I. Time periods. J Endod 1987: 13: 56-9.
16. Fogei H.M. Microleakage of posts used to restore endodontically-treated teeth. J Endod 1995; 2 I: 376-9.
17. Wu M.. De Gee A]., Wesseiink PR.. Morrer WR Fluid transport and bacterial penetration along root canal fillings. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 203-8.
18. Barihel C.R.. Roulet J-Ci an we fulfil even the basics ofendodontic therapy? Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 2002; 16: 30-6.
19. Fox K., Gutteridge D.L. An 'in vitro' study of coronal microleakage in root-canal-treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 36 1-8.
20. Demarchi M.G.. Sato E. FI Leakage of interim post and cores used during laboratory fabrication of custom posts. J Endod 2002; 28: 328-39.
21. Naoum HI. C handler N.P. Temporisation for endodontics. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 964-78.
22. Messer H.H., Wilson PR. Preparation for restoration and temporisation. In: Walton R.E., Torabinejad M. editors. Principles and Practice of Endodontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, USA: W.B. Saunders: 1998. p, 260-76.
23. Eisman H.E. Radke R.A. Post-endodontic restoration. In: Cohen S., Burns R.C. editors. Pathways of the Pulp. St. Louis: Mosby; 1987. p, 640 83.
24. Trabert K.C., Cooney J.P The endodontically-treated tooth: restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 1984; 28: 932-51
25. Isidor F, Brondum K., Rovnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 78-82.
26. Libmon WJ, Nicholls J I. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 155-61
27. Torbjorner A., Korlsson S., Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-44.
28. Heithersay G.S. Combined endodontic-orthodontic treatment of transverse root fractures in the region of the alveolar crest. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36: 404-15.
29. Heithersay G.S.M, Ode A,J. Anterior subgingival fractures: a review of treatment alternatives. Aust Dent J 1982: 27: 368-76.
30. Gegauff A. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: I69-79.
31. Stankiewicz N.R.. Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 575-81
32. Nayyor A., Walton R.E.. Leonard L.A. An amlagam coronoradicular dowel and core technique for endodontically-treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43: 5 11-15.
33. Saupe WA.. Gluskin A.H., Radke JA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 483-91
34. Lui J.L. A case report of reattachment of fractured root fragment and resin-composite reinforcement in a compromised endodontically-treated tooth. Dent Traumatol 200 I; 17: 227-30.
35. Pierrisrand L.. Bohin FI, Renault P, Barquin M. Coronoradicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 442-8.
36. Morgano S.M., Brackett S.E. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 643-57.
37. Assif D., Nissan J, Gafni Y. Gordon M. Assessment of the resistance to fracture of endodontically-treated molars restored with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 462-5.
38. Linn J., Messer H.H. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically-treated molars. J Endod 1994; 20: 479-85.
39. Duret B.. Duret F. Raynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996; Supplement No. 20: S50-6.
40. Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon-fibre posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 13 1-6.
41. Dietschi D., Romelli M., Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 6: 498-507.
42. Fredrikkson M.. AstbackJ., famenius M., Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151-7.
43. Ferrari M., Vichi A., Monnocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fibre posts. Am J Dent 2000: 13: 96-136.
44. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically-treated teeth with carbon-fibre posts-a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000: 66: 6 13-8.
45. King PA., Setchell D.J ReesJ.B. Clinical evaluation of carbonfibre reinforced carbon endodontic post. J Oral Rehab 2003; 30: 785-9.
46. Akkayan B., Gulrnez T. Resistance to fracture of endodonticallytreated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 43 1-7.
47. Fegoretti A, Fambri L., Zappni G., Bionchetti M. Finite element analysis of glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2667-82.
48. Lui J.L. Depth of composite polymerisation within simulated root canals using light-transmitting posts. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 165-8.
49. Strassler H.E. Restoring endodontically compromised teeth with fibre-reinforced light transmission anchors. Contemp Esthet and Rest Pract 1999: March: 59-60.
50. Blitz N. Adaptation of a fibre-reinforced restorative system to the rehabilitation of endodontically-treated teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998: 10: I9 1-3.
51. Schweiger M., Frank M., Von Clausbrusch S.C., Holond W. Rheinberger V Microstructure and properties of a pressed glassceramic core to zirconia post. Quintessence Dent Tech 1998; 73-9.
52. Luthardt R., SandkhulL O., Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina-advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1999; 7: I 13-1 9.
53. EdelhoffD., Sorensen A. Retention of selected core materials to zirconia posts. Oper Dent 2002: 27: 455-6 I.
54. Heydecke G.B,u tz F, Hussein M., BtrubJ.R. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically-treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 438-45.
55. Hornbrook D.S., Hustings L.H. Use of a bondable reinforcement fibre post for post and core build-up in an endodontically-treated tooth: maximising strength and aesthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995; 7: 33-42.
56. Freilich M.A., Meiers J.C., Duncan J. P, Goldberg A.J, Fibrereinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing: 2000.
57. Karna J.C. A fibre composite laminate endodontic post and core. Am J Dent 1996: 9: 230-2.
58. Sirimai S., Riis D.N., Morgano S,M. An in vitro study of thefracture resistance and the incidence of rroot fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999: 8 I: 262-9.
59. Kwiawski S. Geiier W A preliminary investigatiori of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont 1989: 2: 5 1-5.
60. Sevuk C, Gur H., Akkayari B. Fabrication of one-piece allceramic coronal Dost and laminate veneer restoration: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 8: 565-8.
61. Kovonk R.E ., Breedirig L. C., Cuaghrnan W F. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992: 68: 584-90.
62. Burrow M.E, Satoh M.. Jagomi J. Dentin bond durability after three years using dentin bonding agent with and without priming. Dent Mater 1996: 12: 302-7.
63. Russell M.L., Masood M., Cunnrngham L. The behaviour of post-retained core materials supported by coronal tooth structure in vitro. In1 Endod J 1997; 30: 408-12.
64. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M. K ., Cosmos S, Deutsch A.S. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997: 78: 458-64.
65. Mentink A.G., Meeuwissen R., Hoppenbrouwers PP, Koyser A. F, Muider J, Porosity in resin composite core restorations: the effect of manipulatibe techniques. Quintessence Int 1995: 26: 81 1-15.
66. O'Keefe K.L., Powers J.M. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 200 I: 14: 45 1-6.
67. Tjari A.H. Nernetz I.T. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with an adhesive composite resin. Quintessence Int 1992: 23: 839-44.
68. Marmocci E, Ferrciri M, Wotson TF. Microleakage of endodontically-treated teeth restored with fibre posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 200 I: 85:2 84-9I.
69. Vareio S G..R abode L.B., Lombardero P R, Sixtoj M.L, Bahillo J.D.G.. Pork S A.P in vitro study of endodontic post cementation protocols that use resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2003: 89: 146 53.
70. Kwong S.M.. Chwrig G S, Kei L.H. Microtensile bond strengths to sclerotic deritiri using self-etching and total etching technique. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 359-69.
71. Ahbott PV Incidence of root fractures and methods used for post removal. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 63 7.
72. Castrisos T. Abbolt PV A survey of methods used for post removal in specialist endodontic practice. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 172-80.
73. De R, Ik WG. Removal of fibre posts from endodonticallytr-eated teeth. Am J Dent 2000: 13: 198-216.