The behaviour of post-retained core materials supported by coronal tooth structure in vitro

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 408-412

  Russell, M D ^a   Masood, M ^a   Cunningham, L ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Cores; Endodontic; Post; Silver (glass) cermet

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; DENTAL ALLOY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICS; TOOTH CROWN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CERMET CEMENTS; CROWNS; DENTAL AMALGAM; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TOOTH CROWN;

EID: 0031268021     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00108.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BURKE FJT, WATTS DC (1990) Cermet, an ideal core material for posterior teeth? Dental Update 17, 364-70.
2. CHAPMAN KW, WORLEY JL, FRAUNHOFER JAV (1985) Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 54, 649-51.
3. COHEN BI, CONDOS S, DEUTSCH AS, MUSIKANT BE (1994) Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. International Journal of Prosthodontics 7, 178-82.
4. DEWALD JP, ARCORIA CJ, TERRACARE JL (1990) Evaluation of glass cermet cores under cast crowns. Dental Materials 6, 129-32.
5. GORDON M, METZER Z (1987) Resistance to horizontal forces of dowel and amalgam core restorations: a comparative study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 14, 337-44.
6. HUYSMANS MCDNJM, PETERS MCRB, PLASSCHAERT AJM, VAN DER VARST, PGT (1992a) Failure characteristics of endodontically treated premolars restored with a post and direct restorative materials. International Endodontic Journal 25, 121-9.
7. HUYSMANS MCDNJM, VAN DER VARST PGT, SCHAFER R, PETERS MCRB, PLASSCHAERT AJM, SOLTESE U (1992b) Fatigue behaviour of direct post and core restored premolars. Journal of Dental Research 71, 145-50.
8. KANE JJ, BURGESS JO, SUMMIT JB (1990) Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal radicular restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 63, 607-13.
9. KOVARIK RE, BREEDING LC, CAUGHMAN WF (1992) Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 68, 584-90.
10. MCDONALD AV, KING PA, SETCHELL DJ (1990) In vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root treated teeth. International Endodontic Journal 23, 304-12.
11. PLASMANS PJJM, VISSEREN LGH, VRIJHOEF MMA, KAYSER AF (1986) In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. Journal of Endodontics 12, 382-7.
12. ROBBINS JW, EARNEST LA, SCHUMANN SD (1993) Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated cuspids. American Journal of Dentistry 6, 159-61.
13. SHILLINGBURG HT, HOBO S, WHITSETT LD (1981) Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, 2nd edn, pp. 147-8. Chicago, IL, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co.
14. VOLWILER RA, NICHOLLS JI, HARRINGTON GW (1989) A comparison of three core build-up materials used in conjunction with two post systems in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Journal of Endodontics 15, 355-61.
15. YAMAN P, THORSTEINSSON TS (1992) Effect of core materials on stress distribution of posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 68, 416-20.
16. YOUNG HM, SHEN C, MARYNIUK GA (1985) Retention of cast posts relative to cement selection. Quintessence International 5, 357-60.