Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 458-464

  Cohen, Brett I ^a,b   Pagnillo, Mark K ^a,b   Newman, Ira ^a,c   Musikant, Barry Lee ^a,b   Deutsch, Allan S ^a,b  

^a Essential Dental Laboratories   (United States)

^b New York University New York ^*

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CEMENT; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; MIRACLE MIX; RESIN; SILVER; TI CORE COMPOSITE RESIN; TI-CORE COMPOSITE RESIN; TITANIUM; TYTIN; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PILOT STUDY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BITE FORCE; CEMENTATION; CERMET CEMENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PILOT PROJECTS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; SILVER; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0031262322     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70060-X     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Nayyar A., Walton R.E., and Leonar L.A. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 43 (1980) 511-515
2. Johnson J.K., Schwartz N.L., and Backwell R.T. Evaluation and restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 93 (1976) 597-605
3. Hoag E.P., and Dwyer T.G. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 47 (1982) 177-181
4. Peril M.L., and Muroff F.I. Clinical criteria for post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 28 (1972) 405-411
5. Steele G.D. Reinforced composites resin foundations for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 30 (1973) 816-819
6. Linde L.A. The use of composites and core materials in root-filled teeth. I. In vitro study. Sven Tanklak Tidskr 7 (1983) 205-214
7. Stahl G.J., and O'Neal R.B. The composite resin dowel and core. J Prosthet Dent 33 (1975) 642-648
8. Simmons J.J. The miracle mixture. Glass ionomer and alloy powder. Texas Dent J 100 (1983) 6-12
9. McLean J.W., and Gasser O. Glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int 16 (1985) 333-343
10. Taleghami M., and Leinfielder K.F. Evaluation of a new glass ionomer cement with silver as a core buildup under a cast restoration. Quintessence Int 19 (1988) 19-24
11. Arcoria C.J., DeWald J.P., Moody C.R., and Ferracance J.L. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. J Oral Rehabil 16 (1989) 301-307
12. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Deutsch A.S., and Musikant B.L. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. Int J Prosthodont 7 (1994) 178-182
13. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. A 10-year literature review of a split-shanked threaded post. Compend Cont Educ Dent 16 (1995) 630-631
14. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Split-shank threaded posts and threaded posts: tensile properties and stress levels. J Esthetic Dent 7 (1995) 174-178
15. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. The Flexi-Flange post system and its clinical use. Compend Contin Educ Dent 15 (1994) 1124-1128
16. Deutsch A.S., Musikant B.L., Cavallari J., and Lepley J.B. Prefabricated dowels: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 49 (1983) 498-503
17. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 264-268
18. Brown J.D., and Mitchem J.C. Retentive properties of dowel post systems. Oper Dent 12 (1987) 15-19
19. Millstein P.L., Yu H., Hsu C.S., and Nathanson D.L. Effects of cementing on retention of a prefabricated screw post. J Prosthet Dent 57 (1987) 171-174
20. Deutsch A.S., Musikant B.L., Cavallari J., and Bernardi S. Retentive properties of a new post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 12-14
21. Saunders R.D., Lorey R.E., Powers J.M., et al. A comparison of five post-cement systems for tensile retentive capacity [abstract 1534]. J Dent Res 67 (1988) 304
22. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Retention properties of a split-shaft threaded post: Cut at different apical lengths. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 894-898
23. Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. A photoelastic comparison of functional stresses between two posts [abstract S52]. J Dent Res 68 (1989) 865
24. Ross R.S., Nicholls J.I., and Harrington G.W. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. J Endodont 17 (1991) 450-456
25. Greenfeld R.S., Roydhouse R.H., Marshall F.J., and Schoner B. A comparison of two systems under applied compressive-shear loads. J Prosthet Dent 61 (1989) 17-24
26. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Comparison of the photoelastic stress for a split-shank threaded post versus a threaded post. J Prosthodont 3 (1994) 53-55
27. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Clinical usage of the Flexi-Flange post system. Dent News 2 (1995) 33-36
28. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Pilot study comparing the photoelastic distribution for four endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil 23 (1996) 679-685
29. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Post removal using a thick-walled hollow tube post design. Oral Health 84 (1994) 15-22
30. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. The AccessPost and its clinical use. Dent Today 14 (1995) 88-89
31. Ferracane J.L., Adey J.D., Nakajima H., and Okabe T. Mercury vaporization from amalgams with varied alloy compositions. J Dent Res 74 (1995) 1414-1417
32. Cohen B.I., Deutsch A.S., and Musikant B.L. Fluoride release from four reinforced composite resins; a one year study. Oral Health 85 (1995) 7-14
33. Landwerlen R.T., and Berry H.H. The composite resin post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 28 (1972) 500-503
34. Akelinde L. The use of composite as core material in root filled teeth. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 7 (1983) 305-308
35. Cohen B.I., Deutsch A.S., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Scherer W. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of titanium-reinforced composites. J Esthet Dent 4 Suppl (1992) 50-55
36. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M., Musikant B.L., Deutsch A.S., and Cofrancesco G. Comparison of the Young's modulus for six reinforced dental materials. Oral Health 86 (1996) 47-55
37. Lacefield W.R., Reindl M.C., and Retief D.H. Tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 194-198
38. Kovarik R.E., and Muncy M.V. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 8 (1995) 145-148
39. Wilson A.D., and McLean J.W. Glass-ionomer cements (1988), Quintessence, Chicago 60-68
40. Draughn R.A. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 58 (1979) 1093-1096
41. Huysmans M.C., and van der Varst P.G. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations. Dent Mater 11 (1995) 252-257
42. Kovarik R.E., Breeding L.C., and Caughman W.F. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 584-590
43. Htang A., Ohsawa M., and Matsumoto H. Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content. Dent Mater 11 (1995) 7-13
44. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., and Walls A.W. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 1546-1553
45. Mair L.H. Subsurface compression fatigue in seven dental composites. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 111-115
46. Braem M.J., Lambrechts P., Gladys S., and Vanherle G. In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. Dent Mater 11 (1995) 137-141